>>18766968What argument was the most convincing for you?
>>18766968I don't remember if it disproves Buddhism or Platonism. Then, again, the only thing I remember from the book is the author's assertion that agnosticism is atheism for pussies.
>>18766968If that book ruined your life you have an IQ delusion not a God delusion
>>18767002*sighs* and why is that exactly?
>>18767013Because its atheism for midwitsThe whole time Dawkins was just arguing against god not GodBetter put the demiurge
>>18767013>*sighs*Why do you type like this?
>>18767018This
>>18767013it's a low IQ book written for high school midwits and basically everything he wrote had already been debunked with generic articles from the Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy which was largely created by atheists/agnosticsEven reddit is forced to admit the book is mid, so you know it's a steaming pile
Who cares what Dawkins thinks? He’s a pompous ass. He doesn’t know if there’s a god anymore then the pope does. No human knows what truly happens after we die anon. Do the best you can and hope that’s good enough. Either god will be waiting for you on the other side or you won’t care. Either way you’ll have lived an honest life.
>>18766968I had my atheist phase instead of emo, juggalo or whatever subculture that was popular back then and I kinda regretted it.
And no wonder; for even Satan masquerades as yeast of mind
>>18766968More religious freaks need to read this book.
>>18767261Basic human empathy requires me call my opponents freaks, btw>I am le buff gray man so tuff
