God did not allow his son David to build his temple because David's hands were full of blood since he was a man of war and killed hundreds of thousands of people. Instead God commanded his son Solomon, who was a man of peace and wisdom, to build a temple for God's name.Yet the Basilica of St. Peter was built by Pope Julius II who was a military commanded that would ride into battle with his army and killed hundreds of thousands of people. How sure are we the Basilica of St. Peter, a temple that does not bare God's name, is God's house?How is the Catholic God the same God as the God of David?1 Kings 5:3-5>“You know that because of the wars waged against my father David from all sides, he could not build a temple for the Name of Yahu his God until Yahu put his enemies under his feet......>I intend, therefore, to build a temple for the Name of Yahu my God, as Yahu told my father David, when he said, ‘Your son whom I will put on the throne in your place will build the temple for my Name.’
>>18771289Good point. However Christians are given more leeway because of grace probably.
>>18771292Bloody hands cannot build God's house.
>>18771294I think all of lived Christianity is wack, full of fucking antisemitism from patristics all the way to Luther and the current year. Clearly it’s one massive troll. Also, the Bible does say that God has consigned all to disobedience so as to have mercy on all; there is none righteous no not one; etc.
>>18771294>Bloody hands cannot build God's house.Jesus, God's only begotten son without sin, built the third temple. It is the children of Godwho collectively form the living body of the one true God, the body of Christ.
>>18771289You're jumping around like a jewboomer so that's not good.
>>18771289The Basilica of St. Peter is not the head church of the Catholic Church.
>>18771339Constantine's hands were also full of blood.
>>18771306Ok Jimbo.
>>18771365Constantine did not build the head church.
>>18771389Yes he did.
>>18771289Churches aren't temples in the first place. Also there can only be one Temple.The closest equivalent would be a Synagogue.
>>18771289I detect a Muslim’s reasoning in the post. And just like a Muslim to think Catholicism is Christianity because he actually believes the Alexallah Aqua mosque on the Temple Mount and his dealings with Jews in Israel makes their religion official when God said it’s not what you can see by sight it’s what is in the heart by faith. You can’t reason with someone who is placing a building on the Temple Mount by force and by sight. Those people are already headed to hell and don’t know the truth. It’s a political war at this point, not a spiritual matter. Satan thought he was winning by killing Jesus Christ. Roman Catholic Church also is Satan thinking he is winning by infiltrating the church and creating Islam and writing an Arab’s Bible not from Israel. Likewise, when Satan killed Jesus, he had already infiltrated Judaism. Which is why God turned his infiltration of it into an eternal example of what happens to those who do. He said “woe to that man who betrayed me.” His name was literally Jew Iscariot. Iscariot comes from “from Kerioth” which means “to gather to meeting in the city” in south Judea. It means “the man of the cities” while Jesus and the rest of the disciples were mostly rural, working-class fishermen from the countryside of Galilee, Judas was the urban outsider from a prominent, multi-settlement hub in southern Judea. Which sounds more like Cain who built the first cities and who killed his brother Abel after he became Jesus’ disciple (Jesus got God’s favor and is God’s Son).However you do raise an interesting point that Catholics believe they have constructed the real true only one church of Jesus Christ under Peter. If that were true, then they actually believe the Vatican and Italy is where Jesus said he is going to put his church by sight, which is not the case as we find in the Bible is a bold blasphemy lie from Satan. In the Bible, the early church were just scripture believing Christians.
