1951 was the last year that the americans had the opportunity to nuke the soviet union without worrying about retaliation
>>18771730One nuke on Moscow after Japan’s surrender in 1945 and Hitler’s vision of the whole rotten structure crashing down would’ve been a reality.
>>18771730i'm not sure that would have helped anyone
>>18771730The way that for decades anyone who suggested deportations or cutting foreign aid or closing borders or addressing Jewish influence was slandered as a Nazi and silenced and excommunicated, and only now, finally, 80 years after WW2, can we deport people and have normal countries. It would have been 100x worse if the left were able to bring up the Moscow nuke. We would be living in a world where the slightest expression of anti-communist ideas would be seen by the general public as worse than Nazism. People's minds would still be entirely closed to notions of race, nation, and history. Better to let them kill themselves in the ukraine without us lifting a finger.
>>18771929didn't the communists rise to power in the united states because of the soviet union? i don't think people would care about communism anymore if the soviets were gone before 1951
>>18771896We would be living in a world free of far-left thinking. The USSR strengthened that movement throughout the Cold War, some countries remain communist to this day because of it.
Americans are pure evil.
>>18771936>didn't the communists rise to power in the united states because of the soviet unionno absolutely not, it was all homegrown. poor/black/dispossed/aggrieved/female/immigrant/irish/eastern/asian people will ALWAYS have a bone to pick with the "elite establishment" and will ETERNALLY yearn for the chance to overturn society and overrun all the small business owners and kulaks and nationalize all the corporations and whatever.It's human nature, in 7000BC people were abolishing private property and collectivizing and communalizing.
>>18772158this
