>>18780079Got to be honest. I fucking doubt it, they became pussies and weak thinking their god will just save them and their problems. They won't even stand up for themselves when people burn their churches murder and rape their people. Just do that forgive and let god handle everything. I get the idea they have, but going to say. Your own god said I don't help those who don't help themselves. They're going to get purged and they kind of deserve it at this point.
>>18780079i dont browse /pol/ and many other boards because of how much porn is spammed.
>>18780079Christianity is seen as good alternative by the three letters since it prevents people from radicalising. You're a tranny.
>>18780088>They won't even stand up for themselves when people burn their churches murder and rape their people.they stood up for themselves until the 60s when boomers became leftist cucks, open a history book>>18780089wholesome>>18780180<
>>18780180>Too scared to utter the word jew.Atheists/Larpagans/LGBT people are weak and fragile. Besides, jews killed Jesus Christ.
>>18780199>they stood up for themselves until the 60sso you have to use past tense when you speak about your interpretation of christianity. Not a good sign
>>18780079>me when I post on /his, trying to help the children of God see the light.
>>18780351You're too pussy to admit toy love Lucifer and walk in the shadow of the fallen.
>>18780382>LuciferRevelation 22:16I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.
>>18780410Go ahead, say it and don't be a pussy.
>>18780412Look man, its obvious you hate Jesus. Not sure why, but it is obvious.
>>18780433Nta but your kikestain faggotry has promoted low class people to invade spaces and denigrate them with impunity.
>>18780456If you have seen the light, then you know dark hell-spawned demons are not children of God. Some people pretend to be blind, as if that were some kind of virtue, but doing so is suicidal stupidity.
>>18780079Jews and Christians are two drops of the same diarrhea
>>18780079Can't imagine how retarded the person who makes AI slop like that is who people who think it's coolBet the only thing that annoys you is that the AI refused to put Hitler alongside the Christian huh?
So this entire board is the same 3 or 4 psychotic schizos replying to each other?
>>18780180No lie detected. The one book criminals are always given access to by zog is the bible.
>>18780201>jews killed JesusYeah, priests kill the sacrificial offering. That's how a sacrifice works....I bet this nigga doesn't even know about yom kippur.
>>18780622Based AI then. Hitler lamented the rise of christianity...>inb4 muh table talks isn't canon Hitler lore!!!...in Mein Kampf.
>>18780079kek christcucks still do the "prosecuted lonewolf" gimmick while being the largest religion in the world.
>>18780689>while being the largest religion in the world.Roman Catholics and Orthodox are not Christians.
>>18780079Histroons always get raped by polchuds
>>18780632>Yeah, priests kill the sacrificial offeringRomans were not priests and neither were the phariseesThat's why Jesus' sacrifice is objectively classified as a hero's sacrifice not a "human sacrifice"Saying Christianity revolves around "human sacrifice" is just edgelord low IQ atheist retard cope. I hope you don't say it.
>>18780689They also still do the "that wasn't the real christianity" while having 9 gorillion denominations and never having been unified >>18780722
>>18780787>RomansYou said jews, not Romans.>not priestsRead deuteronomy before posting again.>objectivelylol>jesus the herolmao even
Christianity is spiritually and morally Jewish
>>18780079/pol/ has more jews but /his/ has more jeets
>>18780201In my nearest church there is a depiction of Christ on the cross. On the cross there's a plaque with the letters, INRI. What does INRI mean?Anyway, the religious revival of the 80's, led by very politicised pastors was the first attempt at deradicalisation by Christianity. There was a social group called MAR by sociologists and it got completely pacified and folded into reagan coalition to worship Martin Luther king day with their pastors. Christian nationalism you may have heard uttered in the last decade saves the same purpose.
>>18780079>>>/x/43187895>>>/x/43187895
>>18780079Abandon chuddery and start worshipping Dionysus and Prometheus
>>18780079>nostalgia critic in the woke mobkek probably true though
>>18780079>Religion that died whimpering across the West>Is now majority African>WinningAlso I dunno, /pol/ is like Rome. It was cool once but now it's just another cautionary tale on the dangers of over-tourism.
>>18782278White people without Christianity:
>>18782323Your brothers of faith are literally negroes, goblinos and seamonkeys
>>18782323Not much of an own after the revelation the largest christian denomination on earth spent decades covering for overwhelmingly-homosexual pederasts in its ranks
>>18780079You're no Christian if you believe Christianity is the only path to God.
>>18782350>out of 1.4 billion people they found a few pedos in their ranks>that is just as bad as openly tolerating homosexual/bestiality/pederastic deviancy and acts of such in public at the civilization levelThat is some desperate copeDo you "people" get paid to post this pathetic consensus cracking?
>>18782323christians with christianityhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liber_Gomorrhianus
>>18782434>never happened>also never happenedpicrel did happen though
>>187824511st Council of Nicea, Canon 1
Too much organized shilling these days. It's ebola.
>>18782337Better coon than troon, nazoid
>>18782350Catholics aren’t Christian
>>18782614Are you trying to imply that because christrooning out got so out of hand that it was eventually limited somewhat, it never happened to begin with?>>18782637So christians didn't exist until modernity?
>>18782639>So christians didn't exist until modernity?Nobody said that
>>18782644Who was a christian in the high medieval period then?
>>18782653>inb4 orthobrosTechnically they're catholics too, just orthodox catholic rather than "Roman" catholic. But fine, same question before the schism then.Who was a christian in the year 1000?
>>18782653>>18782655The word “catholic” historically did not mean Romanist, which is a novelty of the high middle ages and did not exist before then. Anyways, the true Christians in that era were the same as every other, those who preached the true gospel and administered the sacraments rightly.
>>18780787If someone is killed for religious reasons, they are a human sacrifice. Yes, everyone executed for heresy and blasphemy in medieval Europe was a human sacrifice. Everyone killed by the crusades and conquistadors was a human sacrifice. Christians have no right to complain about religious killings when they are not total pacifists themselves
>>18782659
>>18782658>Anyways, the true Christians in that era were the same as every other, those who preached the true gospel and administered the sacraments rightly.And these TRVE christians, their churches weren't catholic?So what were they? Arians? Monophysites? Nestorians? Cathars? Bogomils?Name the TRVE christianity of the year 1000 please.
>>18782659NTA, but that's not accurate. For something to be considered a sacrifice it must be given to a god. The christ character counts for obvious reasons, as does the yom kippur goat, but to state that every single casualty of a war between two different religious groups are sacrifices is to go beyond the definition and into the philosophical or theological.Anyway, that christkek is trying to artificially manufacture a false dichotomy between human and hero, not deny the sacrifice.
>>18782666You’re a shitposting fool that has no idea what he’s talking about. Were they Romanists? No, by definition. The demand that we name who the true Christians were before Luther is absurd and unfair for several reasons, because the Church can be obscure rather than splendorous, because if I am ignorant of where the Church is by no means implies it does not exist at all, and because it is sufficient for me to know where the true Church is today, and utterly inconsequential where it was in the past. Nevertheless, although this burden of proof is unjust and false, we are able to satisfy it. During the Romanist darkness before the light of the Reformation, the true Church was found among the Waldensians, the Lollards, and the Hussites, as well in several churches under the papacy in which the truth of the gospel maintained despite the viciousness of the overlord, such as is exemplified in Bernard of Clairvaux and Berengarius of Tours.
>>18780079Christianity is Pure Evil
>>18782701
>>18780079His is a cope space for troops and brown people
>>18782725Troons*
>>18780799>You said jews, not Romans.I'm obviously a different anon that is why I corrected the statement. Try some basic reading comprehension next time>not priests>Read deu... blah blah blah.The pharisees were not priests. Are you coping or just confused?>>objectively>lol>jesus the hero>lmao evenWhy even bother writing a reply when you just embarrass yourself like this by being unable to refute anything?Jesus' sacrifice is not religiously/philosophically classified as a "human sacrifice" because that phrase is strictly defined to include ritualistic elements. Jesus' state execution had no element of ritualism. Ergo, not a human sacrifice>>18782659>If someone is killed for religious reasons, they are a human sacrificeNo, that is not how any of those words are defined "human sacrifice" requires death as part of a ritual. >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sacrifice>Human sacrifice is the act of killing one or more humans as part of a ritual, which is typically intended to please or appease gods, a human ruler, public or jurisdictional demands for justice by capital punishment, an authoritative/priestly figure, spirits of dead ancestors, or as a retainer sacrifice>Christians have no right to complain about religious killings when they are not total pacifists themselves>>18782673>For something to be considered a sacrifice it must be given to a godAnd for something to be classified as a "human sacrifice" it must be part of a ritual. Jesus' sacrifice was not. Ergo, it's not religiously or philosophically classified as a human sacrifice. >Anyway, that based Christian is trying to artificially manufacture a false dichotomy between human and hero, Not even close you simpletonSee the wiki link above
>>18782691>Were they Romanists?You said >>18782637>Catholics aren’t ChristianDon't attempt som motte and bailey redefinition here. We're talking about catholics, not "romanists".>Waldensiansdidn't exist in the year 1000>Lollardsdidn't exist in the year 1000>Hussitesdidn't exist in the year 1000So, what church in the year 1000 was actually christian? If you can't name one, we're forced to assume christianity, as you define it, didn't really exist until modernity.
>>18782728Such a big post for such a small brain.>Jesus' state execution had no element of ritualism.kekSee >>18780632>...I bet this nigga doesn't even know about yom kippur.
>>18782728>The pharisees were not priests. Are you coping or just confused?Read. Deuteronomy. Before. Posting.
>18782735Asked and answered, clown.
>>18782742So you have no evidence of christianity in the year 1000? Interesting take. I don't fully disagree even, it's just strange hearing it from a christian.
>>18782735>>Hussites>didn't exist in the year 100023 For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: 24 and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. 25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. 26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come. The original point of the Hussite (and the Lutheran) movement was an opposition to the clergy withholding the cup from the laity. The practice of withholding the cup from the laity is clearly young and not instituted by Christ. Instead the Roman church has decided to administer the Sacrament disorderly some time in the middle ages. With Vatican 2 the Roman church has allowed the priest to share the Sacrament as bread and wine instead of only sharing the Eucharist. This is disorerly as well and goes against the Words of Institution. Only sharing both bread and wine together fullfils them. Leaving out the chalice is not an option.
>>18783125>blablablaThat's great. What church in the year 1000 was actually christian?
>>18783141The invisible Church, as it always has been. This doesn't mean that the visible Church can just go against the word of God.
>>18780079>leftistsLiterally the entirety of marxism and leftism is secularized judeochrstianity based on the beatitudes
>>18783147>The invisible ChurchIs this some sort of harry potter platform 9 3/4 situation, or are there any historical sources for this church existing in reality?
>>18783182Maybe you should consider getting into Theology. Then you could make references not related to a children's book. Also your post forces me to report you. You must be over the age of 18 in order to post here and I cannot imagine anyone over age of 18 referencing a children's book.
>>18783186The lady dost protest too much. A good communicator uses references suitable for his target audience. You seem engrossed with fairy tales apparently invented in modernity. Would you prefer I draw parallels to CS Lewis' children's books instead? He's also a judeophilic onolater like yourself.So, to sum up, you believe in the existence of a community of people (christians) without having any evidence whatsoever for their existence. Is there any evidence for them existing prior to that? What would you say is the most recent evidence we have for them in Antiquity or the Dark Ages, if any? Were the men at Nicea christians? Were the tranny priests discussed at Nicea christians?
>>18783197Judging by his invisible Church comment he's a JW, but you're almost as far off the reservation as he is. Tranny priests? I've heard some interesting interpretations of early church history from bizarrely repressed neo-pagans and atheists, and I gotta be honest, there are some strange bits, but rarely if ever do I hear someone making the logical leap to full on troons of the cloth.
>>18783219See >>18782451 and >>18782614Read the sources before kvetching.
>>18783219>>18783231 (me)>inb4 that wasn't REAL christianityMatthew 19:12https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Matthew%2019%3A12and Matthew 5:29https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Matthew%205%3A29
>>18783231So allowing involuntarily castrated men into the priesthood, but forbidding those who voluntarily castrated themselves == troon priests? Are you familiar with what trooning is?
>>18783244>Are you familiar with what trooning is?Not intimately, no. I clearly used it as a modern shorthand for a eunuch since the result is identical.>forbidding those who voluntarily castrated themselves == troon priests?Nicea specifically says that troon priests need to be removed from office (if they actively chose to troon out), meaning that there are troon priests to remove from office. Nobody writes laws about behaviors that aren't happening, especially not as the very first topic of discussion.
>>18783242Matthew didn't write his gospels. Out of all the authors, he's the first one that almost with all certainty didn't write them.
>>18783219>Judging by his invisible Church comment he's a JWIs there a reason this board absolutely celebrates ignorance? Is there a rule that you have to be ignorant and retarded to post here and I missed it?
>>18783125>>18783147You were throwing pearls before swine by replying to this guy after >>18782735 btw. Stop doing that.
>/pol/Quite literally created as a containment board for teenage edgelords that shat up /new/. Only in the last 10 years have people become stupid enough to treat it as an actual serious board, it is literally a spamming edgelord containment board.Another containment board, /mlp/ serves its function by keeping an insufferable and incredibly loud type of person contained on a board. However-unlike /pol/-the ponyfag board does indeed contain plentiful discussion about the children's show they like. /pol/, even as the "politics" board is a 50/50 between>haha look at this funny I found on twitter>THIS THREAD WAS CREATED BY THE FBI TO CAUSE MY MAGA PEPE THREAD TO 404/his/ is a cool board with lots of cool stuff on it, the arrival of /pol/fags (or rather, the inability of jannies to clean them up) does indeed ruin it and everyone who isn't a tard knows that all the """""religious""""" posting is just ideology posting where its teenagers supplementing their worldview with religions they find online. /his/ is a cool board when you actually post about history instead of just crying that nobody does so.
>>18783406Christianity doesn’t supplement my worldview it is my worldview, while your worldview logically leads to pic related
>>18783406Very based post. It will likely be ignored however, in favor of someone asking what your image is.For what its worth i mostly agree. I like /his/, even the religious shitflinging, as long as modern politics arent brought into the discussion. Thats where it gets really fucking stupid
>>18783410>"people tend to just use religion on this board to talk irl politics, its a stand-in for political beliefs">no anon, you're wrong>my religion is totally unrelated to my politics>see look at this image titled "support atheism" which is about current day politicsAs I said. Be an epic tradcath or a cool orthodox or whatever buzzword of the year you've chosen to be your outlet for expressing your worldview. It's none of my business, I just wish the history board had a greater focus on history and less people trying to use it as yet another battleground for their faggy culture war.
>>18783410>>18783416The right lost the culture war
>>18783416Where do you see politics in that image?>>18783417That’s bad news for the west then, because the secular plague will destroy them and the United States will not exist by 2100 if it does not turn back to Christ. A nation cannot survive such poison.
>>18783423The secular west is the stronger than any christian nation that has ever existed. By 2100 humanity will not exist as it does now, the singularity will happen within the next 10 years.
>>18783429>dying of AIDS>stronger
>>18783430The left image is real other than flying cars. That is what cities look like in modern first world secular nations.
>>18783431>atheist delusionModern cities look like fentanyl, violent crime, poop on the streets, and pride parades
>>18783435>Modern cities look like fentanyl, violent crime, poop on the streets, and pride paradesThey look like the left image. You're mentally retarded
>>18783441That doesn’t look like the left image and when you zoom in it’s full of fentanyl, violent crime, poop on the streets, and pride parades
>>18783444>That doesn’t look like the left imageCope denial
>>18783445This doesn’t look like it either lol. The “good part” you’re zoomed in on is clearly traditional city and not modern where all the fentanyl and poop is.
>>18783449You're retarded, all these images look like the left image. Why do you losers just literally deny things that we can see?
>>18783459It literally looks nothing like it, you’re coping hard. It does look like the right image though, this is what you see when you zoom in
>>18783330The name of the author is irrelevant to my point, which is that it is part of christian doctrine.
>>18783470He doesn’t care, anon. He is acting in bad faith and you should ignore him
>>18783462>Cities aren't giant glowing towers with parks and trees throughout! You are retarded
>>18783470I know, my point was that everything wrote down in Matthew should be taken with a grain of salt, since it was most likely written by paulinists, just like Mark and Luke.
>>18782738>Such a big post for such a small brain.Maybe if you read my post your brain would not be so small>See >>18780632How are you this stupid?No priest killed Jesus according to NT textThus Jesus' sacrifice has no ritualistic parallel to Yom KippurNoneJesus' sacrifice was not a ritual at al in fact. You keep pointing back to your irrelevancy about priestsAre you just in denial about the fact you're wrong or are you a paid shill?>>18782739>Read. Deuteronomy. Before. Posting.Notice you can't point out anything about Deut. that says I'm wrongKekYou lost
>>18783633Anon, the whole bible should be taken with a metric ton of salt, since it was written by small hats.
>>18783673>hasn't read the bible>gets into fights about it anyway
>>18783810There are no errors in scripture.
>>18783380I'll concede my ignorance on theology, but the other people responding to you will not, and they have no interest in the debate you are trying to have with them. That makes me suspect your motives, but I'm just a suspicious person.
>>18783823I think i saw a spelling mistake once
>>18783823>"Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem" Matthew 2:1>"And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria" Luke 2:2These are completely different dates.
>I think extremely online lads are just using religion as a new identity label in culture wars>"no we aren't, it's our religion">thread about /pol/, with an OP promoting religion>religion posters arrive>it's all culture warsimagine my shock
/pol/ = /his/this site is a sad joke and a honeypot jannies are delinquents
>>18783814Notice you can't point out anything about Deut. that says I'm wrongKekYou lost
>>18783823lmao
>>18784424Deuteronomy says jews are priests, illiter-anon, that's been clear from the beginning.
>>18784620>Deuteronomy says jews are priestsNo, it does not Firstly, Israelites were not jews but that is not the pointThe point is only Levites were allowed to be priests and not all Levites were priests, only some. Hence, it does not say all of group X were priests. It is only a tiny subset from a certain bloodline. Your entire understanding of the OT is so ignorant you might as well say Deuteronomy says humans are priests. Don't tell people to read the Bible when you're this stupid/ignorant about the Bible. Back to the original facts: Jesus' sacrifice was not religiously classified as a human sacrifice. There were no priests conducting the eventThere was no ritualistic elements in the eventThere was no repetition of the event (albeit some rituals only have to be performed once so this point is a gray area)There was no pre planning of the eventetc etc etcErgo, Christianity does NOT revolve around human sacrifice.
>>18780079Hilarious you /polhis/ losers always retreat back to /pol/ when you get laughed out of the room
>>18783992Nope
>>18785477Yes, they are. You're retarded.
>>18783406/his/ should just be considered lost and designated as a christfag and wignat containment board at this point.
>>18785020>Firstly, Israelites were not jewsFirstly, irrelevant since jews are israelites.>only Levitesirrelevant since jews include levites.Secondly, my point is clear time and time again in the bible:>you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nationeven in the nt (reapplied to all spiritual jews, incl. gentile spiritual jews)>you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God's special possessionIn their own lore, jews are the nation of priests to the gentile lay-nations. Being spiritual jews, christians have adopted the same claim vis-a-vis heathens.>no ritualistic elementsWe've been over this. Stop bragging about your ignorance. It's a yom kippur reenactment. Two goats, no broken bones, one sent off into the wilderness, etc. You worship a donkey-man-goat-jew. Just come to terms with your own religion, anon.As to the human sacrifice topic, I simply reject your absurd requirement for the presence of an official priest for something to qualify as a sacrifice. This is retarded pedantry. Something killed and given to a god is a sacrifice. In the legend of Agamemnon killing Iphigenia to appease Artemis, nobody cares that Agamemnon isn't a priest.
>>18780088>imagine believing earth matters
>>18785985>t. least gnostic christfag
>>18780079>picrelPicrel
>>18786020truly>t. least gnostic christfag
>>18780079Please post the full image. The foundation of western society is judeo-christian values.
>>18782703Jews don't hate christians, that's an anti-semitic myth. Jews and Hindus combined total 1.5 billion people, who love and adore you anon. Never forget the west is built on JUDEO-christian values, w/ full support from hindu. You're not alone
>>18786047>western society is judeo-christian>>18786056>the west is built on JUDEO-christian valuesNo, just the christcucks and it's regardless of east-west dichotomy.
>>18786047>>18786056Kekd and fixedChristian values are inherently noahidic and talmudic
>>18786047>>18786056Seething jeet
>>18786047Nah, Christians are cucksno wonder why Western politics are going to hell
Two more millenia
>>18785980>Firstly, irrelevant I said this fact is not the pointWhy are you so dumb and unable to read anon?>jews are israelitesIncorrect>irrelevant since jews include levites.Incorrect both factually and logically.Factually, jews were not ever LevitesLogically, you're a moron since only some Israelites were priests, there is therefore no Biblical evidence any Israelite priest had anything to do with Jesus' execution>>you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nationROFL. That does not mean all people within this kingdom are priestIs that the unbelievably retarded "point" you're trying to make or is it something else?>In their own lore, jews are the nation of priests Wrong on all counts>It's a yom kippur reenactmentROFL no. Dumbest thing you've said so far.1 It was not done on yom kippur date. 2 The people executing Jesus did not think it was for their sins3 Jesus' Blood covered all sins, YK does not4 The people who did it did not plan it in advance: it was an angry mob.5 Again, no ritualistic element6 Again, no ceremonial element7 They thought Jesus was guilty, the YK sacrifice must be pure and unblemished 8 The high priest did not kill Jesus9 No scapegoat (most important)It's an objective fact Jesus' sacrifice was in no way a reenactment of YK>I simply reject your absurd requirement for the presence of an official priest for something to qualify as a sacrificeThat was not the only requirement first of all. There is a mountain of other requirements that were not met. And that wasn't my requirement. You or some other equally moronic retard made that claim:>> 18780632>priests kill the sacrificial offering. That's how a sacrifice worksSee?>Something killed and given to a god is a sacrificeJesus was not given to God by anybody who killed him, retardIn no way whatsoever was Jesus' execution religiously classified as a "human sacrifice"Don't bother replying againYou'll just embarrass yourself even more
>>18785980>> 18786431> 9 No scapegoat (most important)Barabas does not count since I know you're going to cry about thisHe was guilty and again the goat must be pure and unblemished
>>18786436>He was guilty and again the goat must be pure and unblemishedJesus is obviously the pure and umblemished goat you udder mongoloid. Unbelievable. You can spoonfeed the chromosome-enriched anon, but you can't make his brain work. Best of luck with the donkey worship.
>>18786479>Jesus is obviously the pure and umblemished goatWhat do you mean "the"? Both goats in the Yom Kippur ritual were pure and unblemished you ignorant fool because the non jewish Israelites randomly let one go by casting lots and therefore did not know which one would be the sacrifice to God....unlike Barabbas and Jesus where the crowd demanded a specific one be killed. Nobody thought Barabbas was innocent. Try reading the Bible next time. Yawn.Two more direct pieces of proof it was not a "reenactment" that were ironically exposed by your own ignorance. Christianity does not revolve around human sacrifice and I easily proved it so throughout you lost your mind and gave upPatheticKeep coping little man
>>18780079>>18786047>attempt to conquer the entire planet by using converts to your religion as a fifth column for conquest>every other civilization resists>"Wow, they're all opposing my religion. Guess Jesus/the Torah was right about the world hating me for my faith"
>>18786522>it's only 96% identical so it is totally unrelated
>>18786561>>it's only 96% identicalThe fact anyone has to lie this badly is obvious proof I won the argumentThe utter moron OP didn't even know there were two goats...claiming Jesus represented "the" pure one instead of "a" pure one. It's like saying G. Washington is "the" face on Mt Rushmore, implying there's 1 and not 4, instead of saying he's "a" face.. Total ignorance
>>18786692>The utter moron OP didn't even know there were two goats..>>18785980>Two goats, no broken bones, one sent off into the wilderness
>>18787229>copies AI details it didn't know and then immediately forgets them>GOTHCA!kekYou referred to Jesus as "the pure" goat to downplay the fact Barabbas was not pure because it debunks your insane claim it is a "reenactment"It was not. There should be two pure goats, not one.The only correct statement would have been "a pure" goat, but that would have implied you're wrong so you didn't say it. Your statement showed a total lack of understanding Don't tell people to read Deuteronomy when you constantly prove you're clueless as to what it says.
>>18787488>There should be two pure goats, not one.See >>18786561
>>18780079All the black people believe in Christianity
>>18787626You referred to two goats as one because you have no idea what Deuteronomy actually says and then started lying when you got caughtStay mad little man :)
