From now on, I'll sue EVERY SINGLE journalist, teacher, scholar and every writer who claim >Hitler was a dictatorI'll use the precedent of Merkel, Macron and FDR being more time in power than him, win lots of money and use the jewish judicial american system against its own>B-but he didnt consult the populationThe German Weimar constitution was never abolished during Hitler's time. Checkmate. Neocons and social democrats will start self medicating because lawyer billsI'm gonna sue for falsification of history, inciting violence, disrupting Human Rights declaration - the right of human dignity and organized misuse of information to scam, fraud and commit tax evasion through charities
>>18782761Why would other people being in power longer make him not a dictator
>>18782764Because the only argument they have for Hitler supposedly "dictatorship" was not having electionsArgument: Elections were planned after the warCheckmate. Destroy the neocons and social democrats, making their lawyers lose so much they will try to kill me and I'll get protection paid by the state
>>18782764Not OP, but his joke is pretty simple and logical.Not a single person calls Merkel, Macron, FDR dictators, despite being rulers just like Hitler.OP says the three mentioned did a lot more 1984 dystopian authoritarian Sorel stuff than Hitler, yet Hitler is the only called a dictator. Again, thats OP's joke. not mine.
>>18782769why are (dumb) rightists unironically like this? (I understand the OP is being ironic). They care much more about the semantic meaning of the word dictator than what actually happens under a ruler.
>>18782768But your argument is about how long they were in power, you didn't mention elections at all>>18782769>OP says the three mentioned did a lot more 1984 dystopian authoritarian Sorel stuff than Hitler, yet Hitler is the only called a dictator. He didn't say this at all, he just said they were in power longer. The joke doesn't make any sense unless the joke is supposed to be that OP is stupid.
>>18782761>Enabling Act - 1933>Reichstag passes a law that grants Hitlers cabinet all the powers of the legislature, able to pass laws without the legislature OR the President>Law Against the Formation of Parties - 1933>Hitlers cabinet passes a law with their new powers banning any and all rival political parties. The Nazi Party is now the only legally allowed party in Germany. >Merger of Powers Act - 1934>After the death of President Hindenburg, Hitler combines all the powers of both the office of President and Chancellor, this is when he start going by the title of "Leader" or Fuhrer. Hitler was indeed a dictator by the truest sense of the word. He used his political leverage and the violence of the SA and SS to slowly grant his position more and more power until he became a dictator of Germany, comparable only to Stalin when considering all the big time WW2 leaders. FDR for example couldnt not bring the USA into the war without the consent of Congress due to his powers as President being limited. Even after the attacks on Pearl Harbor, he had to go before Congress and plead his case to declare war on Japan and both the House of Representatives and Senate had to approve this. Hitler on the other hand simply decided on his own to declare war on Poland and later to invade the Soviet Union.
>>18782788I'll direct my lawyer to say to the person I'm suing>Why was Hitler a dictatorhe will say>That is what scholars agree. The definition is that the power was concentrated in his handsOk>Alexa, search in the archives of congress how many decisions FDR, Macron and Merkel did bypassing congress, how many times they did not consult the people in decisions that affected their money and daily lives. Now compare to the decisions of Hitler from 1933 to 1939>So do you agree that Macron and Merkel are dictators?If he or she say yes, he or she will lose their jobif they say no the judge will have no choice but decide in my favorThey will pay my attorney bills and at least 100k in damages. Also I'll demand the book to be withdraw from stores or the articles removed from their websites
Major examples of presidents using military force without prior congressional authorizationKorean War (1950)Richard Nixon CambodiaBill Clinton Kosovo (1999)National Industrial Recovery Act policies>1935 FDR implemented sweeping economic regulations through executive authority. >Result: unconstitutionalDestroyers-for-Bases Deal (1940)>Transferred 50 American destroyers to Britain without prior congressional approval.>Result: unconstitutionalExecutive Order 9066>imprisonment of approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans.>Result: Severe constitutional violationAngela Merkel>February 2020 – Interference in the Thüringen election>Confirmed constitutional violationSeptember 2015 – Refugee and migration policy>bypassed parliamentEaster lockdown (2021)>The plan was withdrawn after serious legal problems.>constitutional violation.>Reichstag passes a law that grants Hitlers cabinet all the powers of the legislature, able to pass laws without the legislature OR the PresidentThat is, Hitler acted according to the law. FDR and Merkel acted without consulting the congress but there was no congress passing a law granting Merkel or FDR special powers.
BTW Two Atomic Bombs in civilians: Crime against humanityaccording to The Hague Conventions (1899 and 1907)
>>18782864>The definition is that the power was concentrated in his handsThis also isn't the definition
>>18782888It's a dead end. Sooner or later the journalist, teacher or scholar will have to use memetic language as>H-he was deciding without congress, all by himself>he alone signed it!>There was no independent supreme court!for each affirmation I'll have to remember the author that a dictator dictates, that is his job. And that the creation of the United States was outside of the legal frame of the time; the laws and constitution were created after the war. I could say Germany could do the same, so both were neither right or wrong but simply doing the sameAnd that the creation of the United States was decided in secret freemasonic meetings, and that Hitler also acted secretly with his ministers.
>>18782885>muh whataboutism>"That is, Hitler acted according to the law."Yeah, law granting him dictatorial powers. None of what you post negates the fact that Hitler was indeed a dictator. You debate like a retard.
>>18782810why did hitler wear two ties?
>>18782901Another dead end>According the ethnics of journalism and scholarship, you are required to tell the truth>I cant find in your book or article you said Hitler acted within law limits and it seems you are using dictator as a slander not as a description>You are breaking code of conduct, producing a scam and lying to the people who paid for your work, also fraud state, perjury (governed under federal statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 1621 and 18 U.S.C. § 1623),
>>18782761>The German Weimar constitution was never abolished during Hitler's time.The reichstag gave him a grant to tule by decree even if his decrees violated the constitution, in a vote that unconstitutionally barred the communist parties to get a 2/3 majority.But I dont see what this has to do with anything. He was a dictator by any ordinary sense of the word. He had the sole ability to execute power in an arbitrary way with no legal limits on his authority in perpetuity.
>>18782907>He had the sole ability to execute power in an arbitrary waythat is called representative democracyDirect democracy only exist in a few swiss cities
>>18782905none of this negates that hitler was a dictator though. Once again youre retarded.
>>18782897>>18782905It seems like you just don't know what a dictator is
>>18782912>that is called representative democracyNo I disagree. Representative democracies do not have de facto one man rule in perpetuity, and ban all opposition political parties and prohibit any speech contrary to the party.
>>18782931>>>/pol/You're not ready for any big boy boards yet, sorry.
>>18782932The constitution gave him this powerHe could have not used. He did. He could do because they allowed him to chose what to do>Mr. hitler, dont need to ask us, do what you want>Thanksit was literally it
>>18782932Hitler appointed a new successor, so your theory of perpetuity is wrong.
Hitler was a visionaire
>>18782953Stalin raped him
>>18782780>rightistsNatSoc is centre-left economically speaking
>>18782954Stalin hid and ran like a little bitchThe (((lend lease))) is what Hitler was trying to prevent. Or rather, preempt the pincer move. Admit (you) know nothing about strategy and go dilate xixter
>>18782959nope, he stayed in the Moscow during the most critical time in 1941, it was hitler who abadoned his country and run away to Argentina
>>18782966He made plans to evacuate, that's cowardly enough Also Hitler went to visit his relatives in Paraguay, he did not 'flee'. After all he was a highly decorated WAR HERO, it was not in his character to be a craven. And I noticed your lack of response regarding lend lease and barbarossa. Your cohencession has been duly archived in the IV Reich's elibrary
I dont have a problem to admit that Hitler regime, or actually the nazi regime, was semi-democraticI hate democracy but it was not a total "rule of the elite" like in North Korea or ancient ChinaJust because today neonazis are awful people that try to be edgy and post edgy things on the internet it doesnt mean everything bad was his faultFDR for instance directed the war behind the shadows, using the printing machine to bankrupt half of europe and even their ally Soviet Union. Stalin managed to industrialize that country thanks to the hard work of the russian people and a somehow stable systemHow could Stalin feed the population of Russia after WW2 if it was USA who had access to best deals of food and didnt give Soviet Union a relief in imports until late 50s? Hitler was also super worried about lack of food, without Soviet Union food the german people would collapse, or perhaps import food from already starving ItalyIn the 70s agricultural technology was perfected to the point of we being able to feed 20 billion people without issuesFrom 2005 to today China and Hong Kong went even further, other than the jokes about their street food, sometimes insects and dogs, the good industry in China produce frozen vegetables that are not infected with american poison, Vietnam imported technology from China and is a major center of fish, rice and other veggies, but China industry is top tier. They can feed the poor they just dont want to
Germany and Soviet Union had increase populationyet producing food like in 1880Modern meat package industry arrived in soviet union in the 30s I think, but it only grew in the 50s and 60s after Jewnited States helped themAs far as agriculture goes, I think the issue was present in Soviet union until the 70s. Hitler didnt want to admit how to solve itSoviet Union got the worst deal: lose 40 million men in a retard war just to watch USA get all the credit, money and jews leaving russians to freeze on their ownAt the same time Jewnited States was helping terrorists jews inside USSR to commit acts of terrorThat is why USA is a cancer
>>18782942If a dictator for life appoints a successor that means they weren't dictator for life? That makes no sense.>>18782938Just because a dictator was legally given powers that doesn't change the fact that they are a dictator. The original office of Dictator existed in ancient rome where the senate could vote to give one man unlimited power for a set time (including for life). The Romans would be very surprised to hear you argue the Dictator (big D) was not a dictator (little d) because the Senate had elected to grant him that power. What matters is unchecked power in the hands of one man with at least the de facto ability to rule in perpetuity. That's what makes someone a dictator.
>>18782992>He made plans to evacuatefor the rest of govorment, he decided to stay, meanwhile gaytler forced 8 year old children to die to cover his escape kek
>>18783015There is no such thing as checked power in the real worldIf you ever left your room you would see that people that earn more than 400k a year start having access to things you never will, and if you make 10, 20 or 30 million, judges, lawyers and politicians will do whatever you wantIf you are a president that is the definition of unlimited power. I have never seen an american president being stopped to bomb a country, this decision sometimes is not even made by him anyway>Just because a dictator was legally given powers that doesn't change the fact that they are a dictator.That word has no meaning. Is like calling me a transphobic. If senate or congress or whatever give the person unlimited power either using constitution or "interpretation" of the constitution, it means that what the so called dictator or president or whatever will have unlimited power to decide things that is without having to bribe the congress or wait for the opinion of others.CIA shut down every catholic priest calling for USA not entering the war. In 3 years there was no one to say FDR should not enter the war and people always need a priest or a religious guide otherwise they fall for the jewish psyops. They fell for it and FDR entered the war. But we are talking about a time where we had decent people on earth. Even those CIA retards who shut down radio priests against war were somehow decent. Today it's simply pedos and jews and pedo jews doing whatever they wantA simple analysis shows Epstein had more power in USA than Hitler had over germans. Dictator word is just retard
The communists and leftists are also to blame for the Epstein class gaining so much powerFor 70 years every attempt to reduce the power of pedos, bankers and satanic jews were stopped by commies. They were the right and left hand of bankers since the end of WW2
>>18783033>There is no such thing as checked power in the real worldIf you genuinely can't see the difference between the power of the US President and the power of the German Feuhrer we haven't much to discuss.
>>18783059in what regard?They tried to assassinate Hitler. if the american president is pro Israel they try to assassinate those who want to kill him Mossad does not allow a single paper that hurts Israel to pass
Aw sweet a schizo thread
>>18783064>they try to assassinate those who want to kill himLet's just leave this quote hanging here like a corpse in a gibbet
>>18783064Oh, I just now realized something. You're brown.
>>18783064>Mossad does not allow a single paper that hurts Israel to pass>paperSaaar, in the US, we call them bills.
>>18783090He's also baffled at the idea that someone would try to stop assassination attempts against the president.
>>18782887You need your meds.
>>18782955Cool, doesn't make it leftwing.A system of economics does not a system of rule make.
>>18782955Nazi germany was literally corporatist and made the rich richer while exploiting workers. How the fuck is that economically left?
>>18783038How the fuck can you be so stupid? Commies defending banks? Did you forget occupy wall street?
>>18782902Ties have two ends.
>>18782761There is something about light brown, red and black that just looks so cool bros
>>18783337But it had socialist in da name!!!
>>18783337>>18783418To be clear, socialist swine belong in death camps
>>18783428Why do you hate the Volk?
>>18783428The only reason you have rights as a worker even in the capitalist west is because socialist masses protested for years for better working conditions. You are a worthless slave
>>18783437Gtfo nazi
>>18783443He admit it.
>>18783337Corporatist is literally left wingThe Third Reich was a welfare state for Germans
>>18783295'Left wing rule' was rejected in the 1918 referendum for obvious reasons
>>18783432So now (you) agree NatSoc is left wing?Kek, very nice cohencession moshi
>>18783022>Hitler still lives rent-free in this troon's headCool. How do you feel about Titus Flavius?
It's a Miracle God gave us Russia and China, despite their flaws, they prevent the jews release many pandemics and food rations The Ukraine labs producing many pathogens to hurt russians later chinese and later asiansA world where latin americans, africans and jews survived only
>>18783801at the same time they didnt use industry money to provide welfare, the industry money went to SS and Hitler plansGoebbels made a speech about the people who werent drafted into ww2, in fact germans didnt want to send 30 year old fathers to war, but they still didnt stop having a bourgeoisie life like eating on cafés and dancing on summer at streetsIt's too complicated. Goebbels was the smart guy, Hitler was the visionary. Goebbels should have enjoyed way more power. I think it was only in 1944 Hitler gave him power, Goebbels said to a SS officer "Thank God the Fuhrer did the right thing before it was too late" but it was too late. Goebbels had the authority over the regime but not over the military. If it wasnt for this, German would have collapsed during Hitler's birthday in 1944.As much as Goebbels wasnt a good person, he didnt commit any crime, let alone war crime. He and Rosenberg were the ones dealing close to Hitler, while Himmler had free pass in the east. Rosenberg had zero experience as a military strategist, so did Goebbels, but Goebbels would call Himmler to turn the events of WW2 in July 1944, but Hitler didnt want to allow other people do the work for him
>>18784689I prefer Domitian
>>18785632I brefer gonyay
>>18785512HAILL UKRAINE! HAIL BANDERA! Europe Union has achieved the fourth Reich and Ukraine led by the Banderites will install a Nazi empire of Satanjsts to combat the FAGGOT Himosexuals in Piop
>>18784689Azov era UKRAINE is literally the perfect Nationalsocialist state - it blends together the Homoerotic beauty of western transgenderism regarded vis a vis fighters like Sarah Ann cirillo and blends it with the harsh blood and soul militarism of the Fascist emperors of the Second age geritram Just look how it compares with ten scrayton
>>18783801>The Third Reich was a welfare state for GermansFrom 33-39 corporate profits went up but standards of living for workers went down.
>>18785632Patrician taste. I have him 1 below the S tier
>>18785671Wtf are you on about? Are you some jewtin-sucking pidor zigger?
>>18782768>Elections were planned after the warThe NSDAP openly campaigned as anti-democratic, making fun of the democratic process as being fake and gay. They were not going to hold elections after the war.t. threat-to-our-democracy enjoyer
>>18785782Is that why it was a model for all other welfare states at the time? Laws guaranteeing vacation time, 35 hour work weeks, family loans, etc.>standards of living for workers went down.Oh wait, I get it now, you mean for johns with small hats who could no longer get themselves an affordable mother-daughter combo down by the docks?
>>18783337That's not a specific economic policy, that's just a law of nature.Having wealth means you can spend your wealth to make more wealth.Poverty means you have to sell your labor to cover your living expenses.The only questions are: >a) what are the ties of the patricians to the plebs?>b) what do the patricians do for the plebs in return for their labor?
BISCOIT FOR FREE
>>18786269>The NSDAP openly campaigned as anti-democratic, making fun of the democratic process as being fake and gay.sounds just like trump and his team
>>18786269>They were not going to hold elections after the war.not true.They werent anti democratic as much as they believed the specific iteration of democracy they lived in had run its course and became degraded beyond use.Being democratic doesnt mean you cling to broken systems and deny progress and reform as a deviation from TRVE DEMOCRVCY
>>18783337Except German industrialists, relative to labor, got poorer since Hitler came to power.Hitler also did it with peaceful economic reform, he didnt need to break everything at gunpoint like Stalin nor throw around funimuni like FDR.>MUH MEFOMEFO unironically had more liquidity than American fiat, something economists prior to the war pointed out.Bretton-Woods itself was an attempt to imitate what they thought Hitler did.
>>18782966Stalin had to be dragged out of his dacha by Kruschev while kicking shidding and pissing xirself.Stalin also died the same way.Hitler went down like a Shakespearean tragic hero, death by suicide at height of the final battle for Berlin, his great castle sieged, his empire smashed, his army fighting for its life, Odin himself willing his own downfall, Ragnarok, the Twilight of the gods.
>>18786711TDS
>>18786984>“We are an anti-parliamentarian party that for good reasons rejects the Weimar constitution and its republican institutions. We oppose a fake democracy that treats the intelligent and the foolish, the industrious and the lazy, in the same way. We see in the present system of majorities and organized irresponsibility the main cause of our steadily increasing miseries.>So why do we want to be in the Reichstag?>We enter the Reichstag to arm ourselves with the weapons of democracy. If democracy is foolish enough to give us free railway passes and salaries, that is its problem. It does not concern us. Any way of bringing about the revolution is fine by us.>If we succeed in getting sixty or seventy of our party’s agitators and organizers elected to the various parliaments, the state itself will pay for our fighting organization. That is amusing and entertaining enough to be worth trying.>Will we be corrupted by joining parliament? Not likely. Do you think us such miserable revolutionaries that you fear that the thick red carpets and the well-upholstered sleeping halls will make us forget our historical mission?cont.
>>18786984>>18787232>Is our entry into the Reichstag the beginning of a compromise? Do you really think that we who have stood before you a hundred or a thousand times preaching faith in a new Germany, who have smilingly faced death dozens of times from the red mob, who have joined you in battling every form of resistance whether of official or nonofficial nature, who have bent before no command or terror, do you really think that we would lay down our weapons in exchange for a railroad pass?>If we only wanted to become representatives, we would not be National Socialists, but German National Party members or Social Democrats. We do not beg for votes. We demand conviction, devotion, passion! A vote is only a tool for us as well as for you. We will march into the marble halls of parliament, bringing with us the revolutionary will of the broad masses from which we came, called by fate and forming fate. We do not want to join this pile of manure. We are coming to shovel it out.>Do not believe that parliament is our goal. We have shown the enemy our nature from the podiums of our mass meetings and in the enormous demonstrations of our brown army. We will show it as well in the leaden atmosphere of parliament. We are coming neither as friends or neutrals. We come as enemies! As the wolf attacks the sheep, so come we. You are not among your friends any longer! You will not enjoy having us among you!”J. Goebbels, 1928Doesn't sound very pro election to me. And that's a good thing.
>>18786986Based.
