I've been working on it for some time, and here it is - a model for Europe, showing the admixture levels for all the major founding populations of the old continent:>Germanic>Celtic>Slavic>Italic>Greek>Finno-UgricAfter many tests, I believe those are the best samples that can be used in each of them. Caucasian and Levantine admixtures are not shown, but they are included in this model. Enjoy. 1/6
>>187849012/6
>>187849023/6
>>187849044/6
>>187849065/6
>>187849076/6
>>18784902>celticWhy are you ethnoLARPing?
>>18784908>Western European countries 1% Finno-UgricOh my God, I'm no better than a fucking slant-eyed gook; my life has been a lie.
>>18784998>Western Europeans are in Western Europe>South-western Europeans are in South-western EuropeVery useful map.
>>18785269It shows that "celtic genetics" are a literal ethnoLARP
>>18784907Hang on isn't that some random pre-Greek Minoan
>>18785331>Hang on isn't that some random pre-Greek MinoanOther similar samples show almost identical results.
How does it make any sense for Austrians to be more finno-ugric and italic than germanic?You should describe what metholodgy you're using instead of just posting maps because it sounds like a lot of baloney
>>18784901This map is garbage
>>18785571I noticed this too.
>>18785571>How does it make any sense for Austrians to be more finno-ugric and italic than germanic?Geography. Hungary is even more Uralic, which suggests a high presence in this region. Austrians speak German because of Germany's cultural domination, not genetics. I used the Vahaduo G25 calculator, the samples are shown in each map.
>0 germanic and celtic admixture in Hungary but high finno-ugricNonsense
Finland somehow has celtic but no germanic or slavic admixture, these maps are pure garbage.
>>18784901>Austria>13Huh????>Poland with centuries of german settlement apparently has no noteworthy german admixture
>>18785571>>18785714>>18786266It's also surprising to me, but unless there's something wrong with the Austrian sample - that's how it is. The most interesting extrapolation of it is the possibility that Hitler himself was minority Germanic.
>>18784904BoooooooooooooBoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
>>18784901So a few takeaways:>the Finns are their own thing>northern and southern French are VERY distinct>the Netherlands is the most Germanic country in Europe, even more than the Germanicest region of Germany>high Ugric in Hungary suggests that's how the language persisted over a Slavic one>Greek admixture is heavily diluted>Austria, as stated above, is only 13% Germanic
>>18786266Volkadeustche did not once ever seen slavs as human and never mixed with them. It's safe to assume anyone who did was socially exiled from German communities.
Germanic dna is wildly too thin. Germanic people went all over Europe. From the goths to Italy and Spain. To the suebi that went to Portugal and sole helveti stayed there as well. Many germanic people migrated into Poland and parts of Russia called the Volga Germans. Then the celtic people was basically everywhere togughout Europe and only got pushed out of Northern Germany during the roman republican days. Slavic dna is far too small as well. I don't like this at all and something is wrong.
>>18786924All these Germanics who "went all over Europe" were small groups, less than 5% of the population (the Visigoths for example), not nearly enough to make an impact. >Slavic dna is far too small as well.Where and why?
>>18786924
>>18784904Horrendous results. Even according to mainstream DNA studies, the genetically southernmost South Slavs, like the Bulgarians and the Macedonians, don't score less than 50% in Slavic DNA (their core DNA). This is from Gretzinger et al 2025, and the reason why the Romanians are sub-50% is because of Transylvania (without it, they're nearing 55%).
>>18787293>Bulgarians and the Macedonians, don't score less than 50% in Slavic DNAHere Macedonia has 44%, so close enough. Bulgariah as a lot of Near Eastern and Grecco-Italic admixture.
>>18787309Your models are absurd garbage, no offense, and are in contradiction to all DNA studies done to date. Where are you from, by the way?
>>18786763I guess all those Poles with german surnames and vice versa just don't exist?
>>18787310>Your models are absurd garbage, no offense, and are in contradiction to all DNA studies done to date.My model can isolate each admixture pretty well, which means the samples are relatively pure. If a country is signaling for other admixtures, there must be a reason for it.>Where are you from, by the way?Why, you think I'm bending genetic data to suit my own beliefs?
>>18787474>Why, you think I'm bending genetic data to suit my own beliefs?Absolutely, whether correct or not, you admitted your beliefs come first and your chose samples that fit them based on vibes alone.
>>18787798>you admitted your beliefs come first>and your chose samples that fit them based on vibes aloneI think you're projecting your own thought process onto me. You didn't see the results you were expecting, so you assumed it was me who created a fantasy of mine. Where do you think I'm from?
>>18788056You're from a school of thought that's scared of letting others check your work.-
