[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/hr/ - High Resolution

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Maximum file size allowed is 8192 KB.
  • Images smaller than 1000x1000 pixels are not allowed.
  • Images greater than 10000x10000 pixels are not allowed.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1977 Commodore PET.jpg (2.98 MB, 5000x5000)
2.98 MB JPG
Behold! A journey through silicon and plastic.

Pic: 1977 Commodore PET
>>
File: 1960 PLATO V.jpg (1.29 MB, 2720x4095)
1.29 MB JPG
1960 PLATO V
>>
File: 1969 Honeywell 316 b.jpg (1013 KB, 2421x1941)
1013 KB JPG
1969 Honeywell 316 b
>>
File: 1977 Bally Astrocade.jpg (2.91 MB, 4060x2220)
2.91 MB JPG
1977 Bally Astrocade
>>
1977 Commodore PET_2001_Series
>>
1977 Commodore PET_2001_Series_top_lifted
>>
1977 Commodore PET_Datasette reader
>>
File: 1977 TRS-80 a.jpg (1.35 MB, 5616x3744)
1.35 MB JPG
1977 TRS-80 a
>>
File: 1977 TRS-80 b.jpg (1.16 MB, 2615x2279)
1.16 MB JPG
1977 TRS-80 b
>>
File: 1977 TRS-80 c.jpg (1.93 MB, 3547x2036)
1.93 MB JPG
1977 TRS-80 c
>>
File: testout.jpg (7.78 MB, 4320x6120)
7.78 MB JPG
>>5206119
>>
File: 1977 TRS-80 d.jpg (673 KB, 3439x1068)
673 KB JPG
1977 TRS-80 d
>>
File: 1977 TRS-80 e.jpg (2.99 MB, 3648x2736)
2.99 MB JPG
1977 TRS-80 e
>>
File: 1977 TRS-80 f.jpg (1.24 MB, 3476x1491)
1.24 MB JPG
1977 TRS-80 f
>>
File: 1978 ABC 80.jpg (805 KB, 2272x1704)
805 KB JPG
1978 ABC 80
>>
File: 1979 Apple II Plus.jpg (1.13 MB, 2500x2500)
1.13 MB JPG
1979 Apple II Plus
>>
File: 1979 Atari 400.jpg (3.59 MB, 4050x2340)
3.59 MB JPG
1979 Atari 400
>>
File: sgi_Tezro.jpg (295 KB, 1600x1200)
295 KB JPG
>>
File: sparc.jpg (287 KB, 1280x1448)
287 KB JPG
>>
File: edited-DSC09189.jpg (6.18 MB, 6000x4000)
6.18 MB JPG
Polish Odra 1305
>>
File: edited-DSC09191(1).jpg (6.92 MB, 4000x6000)
6.92 MB JPG
>>5210274
le insides
>>
Why did old tech look much cool than new tech?
>>
File: 1979 Atari_800 a.jpg (3.53 MB, 4400x4400)
3.53 MB JPG
1979 Atari_800 a

>>5211944
I think one big reason is that components were big enough to be handled by a regular human with his own eyes. Noe components are so small that you need a microscope to work on them so they look the same.
>>
File: 1979 Atari_800 b.jpg (2.98 MB, 2760x2312)
2.98 MB JPG
1979 Atari_800 b
>>
1945_ENIAC_First_General_Purpose_Electronic_Computer
>>
>>
1945_ENIAC_Programmers_Esther_Gerston_and_Gloria_Gordon
>>
>>5214921

How far this board has fallen... a zoomer purge will come
All simps deserve a fiery death
>>
1960_IBM_526_Card_Punch_Machine
>>
1966_Control_Data_Corporation_Vector_Graphics_Terminal
>>
The Omnissiah approves of this thread.
>>
1970_Raytheon_SUPARS_Online_Search_Terminal
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>tfw looking at pr0n on one of those bad boys
>>
>>
File: 1979 harp MZ a.jpg (2.48 MB, 3500x3500)
2.48 MB JPG
>>
File: 1979 Sony Trinitron.jpg (1.3 MB, 4656x3492)
1.3 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
1981_GT1000_Graphics_Terminal_with_Joystick
>>
>>5212034
Man, I miss the Atari 800. Loved that system.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
1983_Apple_IIe_running_Text_Adventure
>>
>>
1983_Apple_Lisa_Dual_Twiggy_Drives_and_ProFile
>>
>>5231941
E.T. phone home!
>>
>>
>>
File: 1983_IBM_PC_XT_5160.jpg (1.91 MB, 2832x2128)
1.91 MB JPG
>>
1983_IBM_XT_with_WordPerfect_and_Lotus123
>>
1983_Osborne_Executive_with_7-inch_Amber_Screen
>>
>>5234801
I loved using WP. Lotus was great, but speaking from a tech support perspective Qpro was between because I could just copy it from machine to machine via Bernoulli and Zip drives rather than open every package and install.
>>
>>5236499

My memories were on a mid-90s Mac desktop with OS 8.5, I think I did a kindergarten project on MS Word for Mac. It was so intriguing to use it
>>
>>5221219
First computer I ever used was a DEC PDP-something or another with a Hazeltine 1500 terminal on it. Good times.
>>
>>5234801
Loved WordPerfect. From 4.2 to 5.1 for DOS. The Windows versions were terrible, however.
>>
1983_TRS-80_Model_4_with_Dual_Internal_Drives
>>
1984_Amstrad_CPC-464-Computer-With-GT65-Green-Monitor
>>
1984_Apple_IIc_with_9-inch_Monochrome_Monitor
>>
1984_Apple_Macintosh_First_Generation_Manufacturing
>>
>>5241862
i had one of those. played a porn game on it -- some lady lying on the floor and you could use a vibrator on her i think.
>>
1984_IBM_Portable_PC_5155_Amber_CRT_Internal_BASIC_C1-10
>>
1985_Amiga_1000_running_Deluxe_Paint
>>
1985_Atari_520ST_running_Time_Bandit
>>
1985_Nixdorf_PC-08_running_GEM_Paint
>>
1985_Sanyo_MBC-675_Portable_8088_Monochrome
>>
1986_Apple_Macintosh_Plus_1MB_RAM_ED_Model
>>
>>5216891
that is sexy as hell
>>
>>5223611
i learned to program on one of these in 1982, as a freshman in high school. DI_ D0 would give a dir listing of the floppy in drive 0. we would poke random values into random memory addresses to see if we could make the screen go crazy. things like POKE 24352, 234
>>
1986_IBM_6151_RT_PC_running_AIX_Operating_System
>>
>>5247211
>yes just sit behind the machine, pretend you're writing with the unopened pen and just point at the screen like you're seeing something really interesting, you know, like people do all the time.

Ah marketing, never change.
>>
>>5223764
That thing cost almost $16k in today's money.
>>
>>5247357
And for a business-oriented machine with an integrated 13" color screen that even had pixel graphics, in 1979, that was pretty good value for money. Provided you wanted to shell out for the niche of color graphics to begin with, and didn't want a bitty box that pretty much only did games.

You couldn't get an IBM PC with color capability plus monitor for it until 1983, and that would have been about $2500 all-in. So for a machine that debuted 4 years earlier, not a bad price, though I can't imagine the market for it was big (there's a reason industry stuck with monochrome for a long time). Seems more like a cool toy for an exec play with.
>>
1987_Amiga_500_with_1084_Monitor
>>
File: AlphaServer1000A.jpg (1.29 MB, 4032x3024)
1.29 MB JPG



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.