emergent thought structuresi talk to god
I find this definition of a discrete canvas of expressive potentiality <1,0> appealing, although like any emergent structure it requires revision.Anyway, it is sufficient for in-situ study of simple visual data, something necessary to define the nature of aesthetic persuasion.
>>7949232>>7949254This is the thought process behind the composition, I'm assuming? What made you come up with this or where did you learn it?
>>7949232you are conflating mental illness with ingenuity
>>7949232I feel like I see some Gabe influence in this
>>7949288My main goal is to create +MATHART, a holistic discipline born from the fusion of the scalable axiomatic permutability of mathematics and the joyful instinctive-communicative ergonomics of art. A kind of semiotics enriched with aesthetics and logic. PERSUASION (the capacity of an arbitrary stimulus to be ergonomically accepted by the mind of a spectator) is merely an appendix of these dynamics, albeit a fun one.[[MATHART is like an interactive canvas where symbols can transform, sing, and possess color]].As for the image: it is simply an attempt to reach the most conceptually irreducible form possible for representing a 'canvas' of indeterminate extension composed of CELLS capable of alternating between 0 (black) and 1 (white)*. The simplest possible canvas. This canvas is indispensable for contextualizing my sub-goal of formalizing PERSUASION.It is not the ideal MATHART form since it relies on definitions that require too many leaps of faith [math], but I believe my proposal is ultimately more intuitive than the canon for achieving the same purpose.*The specific colors are irrelevant; what matters is the existence of contrast.>What made you come up with thisI’m just an innocent child whose worldview collapsed after learning that women have pseudo-penises.
>>7949332your work looks so whimsical compared to how insufferable your writing is. Are you doing a bfa?
yay the fake schizo is back, i don't care for his nonsense but i love his art
I like it. I go for psychedelia myself.
Reminder this ‘schizo’ not only traces prompt slop but he also vocally defends doing it btw
>>7949356Same, I have still to read any word from him. Welcome back!But why don't people with threads like these just post in /i/?
>>7949445i lik the little dragon looking head on the top left
>>7949553I agree this would work better on /i/ where people essentially blogpost on their threads, but /ic/ has a bigger audience and attention is a helluva drug
faithsemiotic_structurecan be reducedis sufficientbabytalkoversocialized human parodies
>>7955953+hint [gray symbol] = used to reduce interpretive_ambiguity without introducing new expressive overhead.
>>7949232it's unfortunate that your discovered talent for making genuinely impressive art using a geometric and graphic style is marred by you pretending to be schizophrenic using word babble that's intentionally (ie deceptively) structured to appear confusing.i'd say "kill yourself" but i've honestly seen worse people who never grow out of their own ego and that thrive on the fetish of seeing themselves as this misunderstood, mentally ill genius.just like your art for what it is instead of building a fake identity around it, please. it will be better for you in the long run.
>>7949332>I’m just an innocent child whose worldview collapsed after learning that women have pseudo-penises.alright, i don't even care if you're a lying sack of shit, i lol'd
>>7949332>I’m just an innocent child whose worldview collapsed after learning that women have pseudo-penises.TRVKE, foids are disgusting freaks.
>>7949232Cringe TC schizo >>7949445Based Jimmy Sprinkles
>>7949445You know you don't have to put detail everywhere right? You need to control your values a bit better, the readability gets nearly lost where the creature holds the sword and where the rider appears.
>>7949332I always thought you were a woman.
>>7949254Why in-situ?>>7949332Scienticism made every discipline worse. It's a refuge for the talentless and less wise, for those who needed to cope with data and formula, where a structured argument could have been made instead. Modern academia really suffers from it. It's just data slop.In the matter of art: a distraction from actually practicing and getting good.
>>7955953This defines nothing. You should explain notation if you make up new symbols.
