DC hired an artist that draws loli and shota porn for a Supergirl oneshot. I don't want to hear you fags crying that drawing porn blacklists you from the industry ever again.
he kinda crushed it
>>7960633Hot. What a slut. I also like the artist that drew gwenpool in the later issues.
>>7960633you also have to be good at drawing which a lot of porn artists for sure aren'tAnd jews love child porn it gets you a job easy if you make it
>>7960633clean, expressive, characters remain consistent, can draw dogs that aren't completely deformed and uglyidk anon i think he just got hired cuz he was good, tho that first panel on the top left is very funny with the context you provided
>>7960633Holy fucking basedI’m sorry for shitting on western comics, how can I support this?
>>7960633Is that fucking Magi?
>>7960633This got published?
>>7960645Bullshit. Ever heard of feminism? Feminists hate lolicon and guess where feminism comes from....
>>7960693pyw
Now I want to buy a copy. He's a really good artist.
only women can get away with this type of shit
>>7960700>guess where feminism comes from....18th century britain?
>>7960633lmao DC and marvel love pedos what are you on about
>>7960706I think he meant that it was suggestive, not poorly drawn.
>>7960693>>7960706I think he meant that picrel is clearly veiled bestialism
>>7960633>>7960693You just know
>>7960812>>7960813Yeah, thats what i meant, but maybe, what he meant he wanted me to draw beastiality.
>>7960681bruh, I wish I draw fractionally as well as jjfrenchie.
>>7960812>>7960813I don’t think any normal person is going to think that a dog is in any way sexual unless they already know the meme
>>7960851>unless they already know the memeAnon, we are living in the meme era.
>>7960633DC just doesn't hold illusions about their audience. It isn't going to be little girls reading supergirl.
>>7960633>DC hired an artist that draws loli and shota porn for a Supergirl oneshot.Why is Amerika like this?
>>7960861yeah pretty sure if you look at the demographic breakdown for actual comics, it heavily skews towards men 35-40+. Newer generations read webtoons and manga/manwha. DC clearly knows their core audience wouldn't go out of their way to read supergirl, but would probably love loli bait shit but they can't be overt about it, so they hire a loli artist to draw supergirl. I'm honestly surprised this isn't being discussed more given supergirl is gonna be in theaters soon and the conversation around pedos and lolis has never been more heated.
>>7960864i give it a week before people are farming outrage surrounding this calling for boycotts of the movie. DC comics is really fucking retarded if they didn't see the PR disaster waiting to happen here
>>7960693What is remotely sexual about this?>>7960872You'd be surprised. I remember when the mighty magicswords creator was arrested for 16 terabytes of child porn, and there wasn't a peep. It's a random fact people bring up sometimes.
>>7960878> What is remotely sexual about this?The dog humping her fucking spread crotch with his fucking aehago crazy rape face, you retard.
>>7960878surely you can see how this releasing around the time of a major cinema release could be problematic for them if people were to catch on that Joel Jurion makes Loli and Shota hentai and was hired to make a comic about a girl, all during a time where pedophilia is being thrown around and people want some form of justice surrounding the Epstein files. If it doesn't blow up in their face, then I'd consider it to be an extremely lucky bullet dodge.>>7960879Just look at this anon's take, it's not a stretch for anybody to start seeing suggestive imagery throughout all of the comic when they recognize his background is extensive in drawn child porn.
It becomes pretty undeniable that his art while skilled is very sexually driven when compared to anything else
>>7960886…and that’s a good thing.
>>7960891yeah i mean to 4chan cause who give af on here, this isn't a place to preach morality, I'm just talking about how easily this can all blow up if a normie with enough pull makes a big enough commotion over it
>>7960633Incorrect, he used to draw that shit for €€€ but he was hit by Loomis on the road to Damascus and returned to his original passion which is comics.On a side note, he used to draw his girls like toys void of emotion, he's clearly improved.
>>7960633>supergirl>no tummyRUINED
>>7960919I dont think anyone would draw lolicon purely for money, most people find the idea of sexual art of little kids, even if fictional, gross. You have to be at least somewhat into that shit.
>>7960886And that's why it's good>>7960892Normies don't think of these sex shit only terminally online folks does it and it'll be replaced with the next outrage two days later
>>7960633I was wondering why her legs and calfs looked so good.
>>796063337 POSTS IN THE THREAD AND NOT ONCE IS THE ARTIST IS EVEN MENTIONED YOU FUCKING NIGGER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK YOU FAGGOT OP!!!!!!!!!!
>>7960633>>154114088>runs out of (you)s on /co/>scrambles to /ic/
>>7960972>You have to be at least somewhat into that shit.You only have to be not disgusted by it, which is not synonymous with "into it".
>>7960886who is the artistlink to the comicdoomp it fucking useless faggots
>>7961016find your porn yourself lazy gooner
>>7961017KILL YOURSELF FAGGOTSTORYTIME STARTS HERE >>>/co/154101049
>>7960633I also saw the /co/ thread and did this style study of him
>>7960979>>7960827
>>7960979just say you're too lazy to read>>7960885>Joel Jurion makes Loli and Shota hentai and was hired to make a comic about a girl
>>7960633should have hired this dude
>>7961065wtf i like capeshit now
>>7961016>waaaah spoonfeed meIt's an image on the internet in the year 2026. Google it.
>>7960633Damn god to see JJ still workingI hate to see cool original artists getting thrown into the "draw the 70 year old IP" mill but iirc he'd been on break for a while now
>>7961018>frenchit doesn't count. making porn is basically a prerequisite for artists there
>>7960633Am I an art scholar prodigy or do I just jack off way too much if I could identify jjfrenchies art in five seconds after not having paid attention to him for several years?
>>7961065Thing is, they probably tried.
>loli shotaHe's from France.
>>7960886I don't see it, anything involving a female character is probably sexual to you, but that has less to do with the illustrator and more with yourself.
>>7961525It's not even a matter of subjectivity when you look at this portfolio. It's objectively rooted in sexuality. He's a notorious degenerate gooner. It accents his art whether you agree or not.
I didn't even have to type in anything sexual for all of these, just "Joel Jurion Art"
Is he skilled? Absolutely
Is his art not sexually charged? Lmao. Nah you're right anon, lets go hang these up in a children's classroom
>>7961568c-cough j-just feeling the male forms
>>7961572i’ve looked up to him for maybe 20 years, since i first saw his art. never stopped. i’ll love his work forever.
>>7961578yeah, he's amazing. His poses are so dynamic and fluid without sacrificing the angularity or hardness of structure, the shape language is great, and the pin up aesthetic is real fucking treat for the male gaze. I don't think it's surprising why DC might have hired him, but it's a bold face lie to say his work has no sexual undertones
>>7961581you worded that perfectly. a treat all around, really (i’m a femanon fan.) /laugh/ i love those undertones. feels like a celebration of the beauty of form and the human body.
>>7960693guys what is the meme they're talking about with this image?
>>7961568Dude's carrying an entire ham leg in his pocket.
>>7961040I have dyslexia chud.
>>7961065I miss this dude.>>7961568The persective is a little wonky but its still a sketch so its okay.>inb4 muh fish eyesIts still off.
>>7960700You seem to be under the impression that they're loyal to their golems and wouldn't play all sides against each other on purpose.They're literally taught from the second they learn to read that gentiles have no souls and exist to be abused for profit.
>>7960885>all during a time where pedophilia is being thrown around and people want some form of justice surrounding the Epstein filesOn the contrary, people are tired of stupid teens calling everything pedophilia and everyone they don't like pedophiles or using "is in the files" as carte blanche for abuse when most of the time people mentioned in the files are mentioned in passing, out-of-context conversations or outright cleared of wrongdoing by the files themselves i.e. Michael Jackson and JK Rowling.
