>"leading the eye through the painting"
>>7965733that's mostly for comic book artists and other sequential art. it's perfectly reasonable to make a singular focal point for an illustration, usually a character's tits or a dope mountain view.
>>7965733what? you gonna act like its pseudobabble because it isn't formulaic? Your eyes are just predictable sensory input devices at the end of the day and a good artist knows how to violate your brain. get raped
It's legitimately amazing how furries have remained so persistently obnoxious for decades
>>7965756probably not a furry artist who drew that, a real furry would at the very least draw a character with a recognizable species, even if inaccurate. can't tell if that's a sheep or an ugly dog.
>>7965781nah a furry artist definitely drew that. You can tell by the shape language
>>7965782ye u can tell by the lines and the way that it is
>>7965733cope harder wagelet
>>7965733"paintings" are something worth looking at for minutes and hours, the digital shit thats taken over the term is not
Are you guys being a little bit black again?
>>7965733If I was the old me, I would have told you the answer that even a /beg/ like you could understand.Now..... I just want /beg/'s to suffer. You guys don't deserve ANYTHING!!!!!!!
>>7965832Such cruelty towards the wojack poster
>>7965781It's safe to assume that if someone draws an anthro character then the probability of them NOT being a furry is close to 0
