[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


The reason I fear it, is because I slathered the entire thing with clear acrylic. Because it was chipping, falling apart. Thought it was just another Goodwill find I inherited.. UV resistant, but I may have nearly ruined a million dollar piece.
So he is the most counterfeited artist, but some early Oregon Ai guy made an algo that can detect a real one.
Imagine, owning a Pollock, and being the fool that slathered it in clear goop.
It's right in front of me. Kind of a desktop now. Glad I used UV grade goop.
Much like pic. On Masonite, sparkly automotive paint. The right size, and I think I know its provenance now. Monterey California.
>>
>>8013180
Why do you think Jackson Pollock made it?
>>
>>8013180
pic is not mine, representative, but not as fun and colorful as mine
>>
>>8013183
Because it's the right size, on Masonite, with the right paints. He used a lot of automotive, sparkle paints at the time. Frame is same era...
So my parents liquidated a family estate. Rich AF Carmel CA old money artfags. A lot of good stuff, that nobody documented, gave a shit about.
>>
Ai said I could confirm it. Requires chemical analysis and such.
>>
I wonder how much I devalued it? It's still very vibrant. Kind of looks like a Pollock under glass. I ruined the topography though.
>>
wouldn't it be funny
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&hs=gx5&udm=7&fbs=ABfTbFVyMZGZf1hfvX9uKjN_-G8cxpBkeIeqYwoCbfNVc4vKE7plZzta63Pe5DpJ3XFR9XzI_yj6fb6bfPt1x_5u3nRcG7tR9jg4Omd7-UnDuaw5i-FzhxdAoJWFXatAvyuyBY-i00XHjzgJ9rxDh2CcW3-OMNREusIqOLiUhHojRnGEOAQqw7CdF9hb6SrDDBeTTLOhUO-ppfCh_hrYMl--5bXZhSV_7w&q=mad+world&sa=X#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:bd0c1959,vid:u1ZvPSpLxCg,st:0
>>
>>8013180
Its fucking grim how the west shifted their taste in art to something like this only because the jews became a patron to these pre/beg/s and gaslight the entire west civilization into thinking that this is an actual art
But yeah, good for you OP if you actually own this splatter. Atleast you can get yourself a comically large amount of money by selling it to a gallery or whatever goy with herd mentality that took interest with this 'piece' out there. Wish you all the luck
>>
>>8013180
>but I may have nearly ruined a million dollar piece.
Nearly ruined, or actually ruined? I'm sure there are ways to remove clear acrylic from a painting, in the same way they remove varnish or other top layers.

>>8013218
>because the jews became a patron to these pre/beg/s and gaslight the entire west civilization into thinking that this is an actual art
I blame the critics. They should have torn this shit apart, but wanting to be cool and trendy, and at the cultural forefront, they kept ceding ground to shittier and shittier art, and now we have zero standards. Fuck I hate art critics!
>>
>>8013180
>ai told me
retard
>>
File: 1749330513007144.jpg (2.13 MB, 772x2370)
2.13 MB JPG
>>8013228
the critics did tear it apart, as did the audience, as did even the government, enough money and time overcomes all obstacles
>>
>>8013234
typical juice and talentless spook vamps w
>>
>>8013180
ok
>>
Go get it appraised and the update us in a couple months
>>
File: 1778182409482.jpg (130 KB, 778x818)
130 KB JPG
>>8013180
Pollock was an astroturfed CIA cutout, who's work was pushed to the forefront of culture as a way to take the reigns of contemporary art away from academic socialists and give them to money laundering millionaires. They knew that institutions like universities and the arts were infested with commies and used Pollock and the other abstract expressionists like DeKooning and Rothko to steal the cultural spotlight away from the commies by inflating the price and hype of this worthless art that nobody wanted to a greatly inflated degree.
Soon humanism was out and abstract was in and art became a guessing game for critics and the public and an easy way to hide your money from the IRS for industrialists.
(Just buy some shitty abstract painting for $10K and donate it to a museum as a charitable gift worth $10 million. And deduct that amount from your taxable income - still happens frequently in what's left of the fine art world today).
https://www.bbc.co.uk/culture/article/20161004-was-modern-art-a-weapon-of-the-cia
The artistic value of a Pollock is all theatricality and superficial hype. It makes for an interesting example of cold war history tho.
>>
>>8013180
you could say it was like that when you got it. nobody will be able to tell
>>
>>8013234
>the critics did tear it apart, as did the audience, as did even the government
Keyword is "DID". Our bulwarks against this shit failed, and started huffing their own farts.
>>
>>8013183
He believed an ai
>>
If you did you're a hero



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.