>>8018620
If Grok had made it the nipples wouldn't be censored

>>8018620
I mean, it already does make quality art, otherwise people wouldn’t be so pissed at it

File: 1770798569102263.jpg (19 KB, 324x416)

19 KB JPG

>quality

The most depressing thing about AI art isn't so much the water stuff, the GPU prices blowing up, the political consequences of exposing boomers to AI footage of white women getting attacked on the bus all day, it's that it reveals that all this time you could have made it but didn't because you were too lazy or scared.

The bar isn't on the ground because Tung Tung Tung Shahur made everyone retarded it was just always there, in the end Chris Chan got more money and more pussy with his art than most the anons here

>>8018655
This is absurd levels of cope.
AI lets you generate infinite Sakmichan-tier renderings instantly. The vast majority of people who try to learn to draw will never be able to even produce one painting on the same level. AI art meets a really fucking high bar of technical quality, and if it didn’t then no one would feel threatened by it in the first place.

>>8018620
isn't this the russian cartoonist that got killed by russian special services in poland?

>>8018620
at the very least you can just do watercolour trad illustration and sell those individually, or paintings, etc. art has always been a low pay hustle or a lottery, it hit tech workers way harder which is deserved.

>>8018671
The other one got killed. This one is still ok.

>>8018656
It will still look ultra photorealistic with exactly same style as copied. AI don't really have any style so nah... + fucking up with posers and making photo bashes in order to get what you want isn't worth it because at that time you usually have half of your painting done.

>>8018943
>AI don't really have any style
Also wrong, you can train lora models to draw in any style you want. There are sites with style modules for AI. Perpetuating falsehoods like this just allows the most egregious cheaters to skate by because "surely AI couldn't draw that, look at the style!"

Anytime you make a brainless assertion like "AI can't draw hands" you're actively supporting AI and the cheaters that abuse it.

>>8018943
Bro I HATE AI more than anyone but >>8018957 is right, it can copy any style.
It’s evil shit, but lying about it doesn’t help.

>>8018968
it can now ? i don't know im not watching news on it i thought it's still retarded and only does ultra realistic cringe shit.

>>8018655
you are way behind the curve here, why bother making your little rants?

>>8018957
>>8018975
Yeah but it only produces shit that already exists. I bet a few years down the line half the AI content will look eerily similar to one another.

>>8019387
Is it because it will train on each other ?

>>8019579
No, because the way it functions will always produce middle of the the road shit
LLMs function by predicting the most likely outcome so they will always be tied down to basic bitch shit

>>8018655
>in the end Chris Chan got more money and more pussy with his art than most the anons here
delete this

>>8018975
It’s been able to do that since 2023, where have you been?