File: Crits.png (1.68 MB, 2149x1669)

1.68 MB PNG

>>8035500
Rate and crits?

>>8035506
Mid to high beg. Bit hard to judge because I can’t really read this very clearly. Work on lights, shading, clarity, and perspective. The perspective is a bit warped

>>8035518
Mid beg with a lot of potential. Get more familiar with basic forms if you want to draw things like this.

File: No watermark2.png (1.52 MB, 2148x1669)

1.52 MB PNG

>>8035521
Uploaded the pre-color calibration version.
While I doupt this fixed any of the aforementioned mistakes it should be closer to how it looks like on my tablet.

Even slight changes color grading make it look like dogshit.
Also seems it does not read very well as a small image.

>>8035521
you killed him...

bro that guy is not mid beg are you people fucking kidding
god this board is insane

File: Returnwm.png (1.42 MB, 1197x1830)

1.42 MB PNG

Computer fixed, newest work so far.

>>8035547
>t.that guy

>>8035577
I am not that guy.
I just wanna know my rating and improve.

Mid to high beg seems ight.

>>8035599
I’m the one that gave the rating.

Please take the ratings given to you on here with a grain of salt. They really don’t matter, people on this site are just obsessed with knowing where they stand as an artist skill wise. Just focus on the critique given and growing as an artist regardless of what is said.

>>8035919
it was shit critique, i am 5547

>>8036021
I don’t put in as much effort for my crits in these threads. I just contribute because I know what’s it like being a younger artist wondering where you stand skill wise.

File: temp.png (567 KB, 1500x1500)

567 KB PNG

>>8036027
I don't want your crit specifically


Took the ink off this reisen and censored (she still looks great as pixelart which was a nice surprise), included the arm that I haven't done because I was conflicted about drawing the clothing folds, censored the cat girl
Both because my work is not public property
I am hoping to get tips on blocking in painting stuff accurately from somebody who can, it drives me up a wall

Good golly gosh, the thread just started and there's already drama.

bump

>>8036062
Fuck you!

>>8036171
>Fuck you!
NO U

>>8035500
Why is nodraw bread?

>>8035500
rate my shit GRAAAAAAHHHHHHHH

>>8035500
fuck off had 0 replies in the old thread

literally 2 people who posted work didnt get yous, stop trolling

>>8021967
mid int or above, are you an actual comic artist btw?
>>8022072
low beg

>>8036177
You’re a god damn kike!

>>8036318
>You’re a god damn kike!
SILENCE TAMAR!

File: Amicus Sketch (Loincloth).png (2.4 MB, 1208x1554)

2.4 MB PNG

Finished this this weekend, I think I'm backsliding.

File: help.png (1.68 MB, 1427x909)

1.68 MB PNG

>>8035531
mid-beg
>>8036054
what in the schizo pixelated bukkake / beg
>>8035556
high beg/ low int?

son

File: 1787276100971018.png (2.27 MB, 2000x3000)

2.27 MB PNG

Just started a few months ago.

File: image0.jpg (241 KB, 2360x1640)

241 KB JPG

>>8035500
Reposting from last thread. Feel free to rate.

>>8036612
i thought this was a 3d model troll post, but now i zoomed in, my bad g
it'd be worth seeing how you draw other things or if this is straight up painting over a 3d model render (eg instead of it being a side to side copy)
mid-high int at least if referenced/copied side to side

File: god.jpg (256 KB, 2048x1424)

256 KB JPG

>>8036620
No 3D involved in this, it's pure painting

File: IC.png (2.4 MB, 1772x1181)

2.4 MB PNG

Rate? some advice o crit will be usefull.

>>8036612
High int, I really like your work, it's very creative.

>>8036559
mid beg, I'm not the right person to say this, but I think you need to work more on your rendering.

>>8036438
I can't say if they're really watercolors or digital, i bet for dig, but it looks like it was done with relaxation and fun. I like it.

>>8035556
Low Int. The pose is very dynamic, sexy, I like the render and it conveys a lot of energy.

File: wincelow.png (264 KB, 666x796)

264 KB PNG

this is from two years ago actually, before i started grinding.

File: IMG_3124.png (669 KB, 851x745)

669 KB PNG

>>8036628
thansklies:33333
yeahh its digital, its the maxpack watercolor pack for procreate and a special canvas


this one is with the same one

>>8035506
>>8035531
I can't see shit bro

>>8036757
I thought those where trad.

>>8036853
nooo, i find it too expensive to work with irl water stuffies
but
the lineart is made in csp
and then i port the naked file to my procreate where i dump it on a water color canvass and color it there

im however really happy to hear u thought it was trad

https://files.catbox.moe/jrr950.png
https://files.catbox.moe/dw26li.png
https://files.catbox.moe/a0leab.png
https://files.catbox.moe/t386ui.png
5 minutes each
also reminder that if you dont pyw your rating doesnt count

File: Colour (Custom).png (3.6 MB, 2197x1292)

3.6 MB PNG

sure it's been a while

>>8035531
Try to click on it to get the full resolution image, looks clear on my monitor.

I am >>8036948 . Meant to reply to >>8036793

File: 20260905_150901.jpg (2.74 MB, 2296x4080)

2.74 MB JPG

What do you guys think?

istg if you niggers dont say thats prebeg the rating is just inconsistent.
Why do you try so hard to push int into beg?

>>8036950
Prebeg

File: cglg.png (3.32 MB, 1702x2000)

3.32 MB PNG

Have I improved since the last thread? geso

>>8035521
High beg
>>8035556
Mid beg
>>8036054
Low beg
>>8036434
Pre beg
>>8036559
Low beg
>>8036625
Mid int
>>8036950
Beg

>>8036950
Low beg towards mid beg
You seem to struggle with anatomy and depicting the forms of the body in 3d. (learn to draw organic forms)
The way you did her head, face and the shoulder section is actually alright tho which makes me think mid-beg.
More of your work?

>>8036957
You seem to be a newer user. The standards for "intermediate" artist are higher than in other places.
low int is like... good enough to do it as a side hustle.


>>8036628
Great potential. Keep it up

File: IMG_8580.jpg (1.05 MB, 3271x2997)

1.05 MB JPG

I’ll give ratings too if anyone wants just reply w their work

>>8035506
Mid /beg/ you need anatomy practice in general but I appreciate the creative scene it looks like you understand lighting and mood but have basics to understand still
>>8035556
Low /int/, you have amazing rendering and some sexy spects and a lot of promise but there are some bulby anatomy issues keeping it from looking professional
>>8036054
Low /beg/
>>8036434
Low /int/, almost looks good but is really lacking sovl, maybe you need gestures
>>8036438
I would need to see an attempt at a more elaborate scene, this looks nice but is hard to rank. If this is a fully done image I would say try drawing with a bachkground or another building in the distance and zoom out the scene a bit. Just a little more than the main subject building would go a long way
>>8036559
Cute art! Mid /beg/, keep it up
>>8036612
>>8036625
The facial anatomy of the monsters is a bit pug-like but the detail and aura of them is awesome. High /int/, nearly rank 8 on the chart
>>8036628
/beg/, needs more studies

>>8036739
Post new work?
>>8036880
Pretty neat, I like it low /int/
>>8036950
Mid /beg/, needs more detailed broken down studies
>>8036980
/beg/
>>8037141
Cool art but it is hard for me to know if you have a good grasp of the shape of forms. Some aspects are beg and some seem int

File: 734-1.png (1 MB, 1938x2343)

1 MB PNG

Ill bite. looking for critique and rating.
Current Page: https://files.catbox.moe/t5kcl1.png
Old Page: https://files.catbox.moe/cu7pq3.png

File: temp0.png (91 KB, 362x198)

91 KB PNG

Lol, a fully rendered drawing gets called lo beg, you people only embarrass yourselves.

also fucking kek, the guy who painted the dinos might as well be ruan jia in disguise and you stupid faggots are calling him <adv, he is actually ridiculously skilled but youll never concede that to him

>>8037261
Full rendering =/= perfect, I have fully rendered art and I know at some point that fully rendered art was /beg/. Being able to color something in does not make it advanced

>>8037265
I said he was pretty much the highest end of the chart I don't know what you are bitching about

>>8037261
>Lol, a fully rendered drawing gets called lo beg, you people only embarrass yourselves.
So because something is fully rendered, that automatically puts it in int/adv tier? Lol this guy

>>8037221
This is the drawing im currently working on for reference: https://files.catbox.moe/y1bd34.png
I am still in the process of rendering it and painting on the clothes which im not the best at but im working on my cloth skills.

>>8037276
puts it above "visibly attempts fundamentals, fails every time". The lineart is a success (i dont even need gl include the layer with line weights and hatching) and the rendering is a success, that is the definition of >mid beg. Dumb faggots cant even comprehend the catgirl sketch, and they think i cant paint a fucking pear so they tossed me into low beg, nigger i posted the pear its shit, i am not going to post good paintings here.

>>8037304
You aren't low beg, but your drawings are unappealing (for multiple reasons) which drags people's impression of it down.
It's high beg to low int.

>>8035531
mid beg
>>8035556
high beg / low int
>>8036054
mid beg
>>8036434
high beg
>>8036438
high beg
>>8036559
low beg but cute
>>8036612
high int
>>8036628
mid beg
>>8036880
high beg
>>8036950
low beg

File: Screenshot 2026-09-09 220114.png (358 KB, 1915x1010)

358 KB PNG

Working on this right now. I now I have redo the hands and feet. But, I'm very happy with the folds.
A lot less shitty than how I used to do them.
I want to contribute so I'll (You) some anon with my worthless observations in my next posts.
If I don't say anything else, that probably means I don't have a high enough level of articulation to comment on anything else.

>>8036980
You actually got worse, LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
>>8037180
>Cool art but it is hard for me to know if you have a good grasp of the shape of forms. Some aspects are beg and some seem int
Not him, but what aspects makes you think it's beg? Can you be specific?

File: 1788815355834540.png (1.3 MB, 1197x1830)

1.3 MB PNG

>>8035556
I would say low int. This has very nice shading, I like your expressions too. The perspective is very off.
Mind you perspective is not my strong suit. I'm sure someone can explain this better but, she looks like dwarf instead of being in certain perspective.
This also makes her pose very awkward. When drawing in a pose, especially where parts of the character's body is tilted in certain ways, you should try to block out the character using boxes like in pic related.
(not exactly tho). Besides that, one of the arm's wrists are missing. It makes her look like she has one obese arm due to the lack of defined wrist.

>>8036559
Mid beg. I say that because even though the skill is low, it still has nice appeal and the thumbnail image even looks nice. This is a very cute drawing.
I think you got the general shape of the subject down. But, I believe you should think about how forms interact with each others. The arm for example. It is three parts, the hand, arm, and shoulder. How you'd drawn it made it melt into one whole object. Each part should chain together and overlap each other in this position. Try to actively think how much of something should be shown or implied. The same thing about perspective in the reply above applies here.

>>8036628
Mid to low beg. I think you have good base for improvement, you just need some help with proportions and forms. Like the second figure's eyes are too big, making them too close together. Eyes are normally one eye apart from each other. So you can keep that in mind and that when drawing them in a three quarter view, that they keep the same height, but not the same width.
Looking at skeleton and seeing how far and close things are in relation to each will help with proportions. Picking out a few things to remember like how the elbow are placed around the belly button.

My post got too long :(

File: comparison.png (1.69 MB, 1608x1498)

1.69 MB PNG

>>8037361
>>8037380
Oh and here's a comparison of the last times I drew her.
Not done with the third one, but improvement?

>>8036628
>>8037056
>>8037175
>>8037329
>>8037380
Thank you for your feedback!

>>8037383
Looks the same, but the arm is now broken. They are nice, though

File: IMG_0028.jpg (1.59 MB, 1813x2090)

1.59 MB JPG

Rating is much appreciated

>>8036871
>5 minutes each
High /int/

>>8037369
>You actually got worse
You fag

>>8037369
I am not sure if he is /beg/ or /int/ because we can't see faces, only an angle of one and it looks questionable whether it would look okay straight on. I also do not see a lot of chest structure on the girl, but it may be because the white armor is not shaded plus the angle. The man, I am not seeing any obviously structured anatomy, the upper-half of his body has a lot of elements that obscure the face and neck as well as even the chest, from what I can see his spine is not following through the way it should be.

On the other hand, the attention to detail in the armor is amazing, the silhouettes are interesting, the style is great.
This is the only work that was split and it is because I can't tell if it is someone with a lot of stylistic talent who is hiding some fundamental problems with bulkiness and with an interesting pose. I was someone as was /beg/ had a lot of natural movement to my pictures. If this artist has that but is bad at faces and structural fundamentals (body details, consistent replicatable armor details) then they need to study structural fundamentals to truly be out of being beginner because you can't look like Delgo when head-on
If they already are good at faces and body anatomy they are definitely in /int/. This was just not a clear enough picture to tell, it is the only picture I could not really see clearly the other ones I knew one way or another what I could place them at and why

File: comparison.png (3.05 MB, 2472x1708)

3.05 MB PNG

Only semi-related to this thread but what exactly causes gaps like pic related?

File: IMG_313054564654.png (236 KB, 590x437)

236 KB PNG

>>8037175
i will give it a try
desu i havent really dont any of the sort so it would be interesting


this thread will be here for a while so i will post it here when i do make it
thansk for the advice :3
>>8037329
yay :DDD

>>8037520
Speed is a function of experience

>>8037777
Holy Checked and TRVKE

>>8037380
Thank you kindly! For the perspective, I actually used CSP's 3d model reference for it (With a few tweaks) now the arm I'm 100% aware of and had no clue how to get it how I wanted it (and if someone could redline that for me that would be appreciated)

File: Untitled2247_20260910164109.png (2.49 MB, 1670x2154)

2.49 MB PNG

Not sure how id rate anyone else a little unsure. but any ratings or advice are heavily appreciated

>>8037383
Very nice. Reminds me of the spring goddess in FOMT

>>8037889
high /int/
>>8037779
Mid /int/
>>8037773
/high/ int
>>8037464
/pro/
>>8037419
Mid /int/

>>8038114
all those ratings 1-2 levels too high

>>8037889
high beg
>>8037779
low int
>>8037773
architecture and atmosphere dont carry to mid int in my opinion, the human is symbol drawn and the line work is pretty weak all throughout the piece, ifykyk, low int, maybe better than the other guys, probably just different
>>8037464
not as polished as you can get it to be, is it? low int
>>8037419
low-mid beg

File: 739.png (794 KB, 2228x1792)

794 KB PNG

>>8037221
30 minute drawing

File: 1762939867031198.gif (2.57 MB, 498x281)

2.57 MB GIF

>>8036880
>Hatemonger fanart
Fucking based.

File: IMG_3674.png (784 KB, 1375x1961)

784 KB PNG

>>8038332
second one

File: Over_9000!.png (71 KB, 200x200)

71 KB PNG

>>8038332
>>8038333

>>8038333
>>8038332
construction problems like the legs on the blue one not having the same angle at each bone: the femur on the rendered leg is going outward, on the other leg its ?? its like you thought that you should shorten both bones the same amount instead of realizing that they are getting foreshortened differently in 3d space.
Very good mech-drawing skills though obviously and nice colors, low int
>>8038308
high beg until finished drawing is posted

>>8038308
low /int/
>>8038332
>>8038333
high /int/

>>8038375
mid /int/

>>8038375
High beg. Too stiff and unnatural to call int.

>>8037221 (Me)
>>8037261 (Me)
>>8038308 (Me)
>>8038354
If you want rendered check my other posts

>>8038406
Oops i linked the wrong post 8037261 is not me i ment >>8037303

>>8037303
>>8038406
mid-high /int/

300k a year, dm me

File: export202609112256040949.png (424 KB, 1441x1523)

424 KB PNG

Please rate

File: IMG_20260912_193442.png (574 KB, 874x1042)

574 KB PNG

time to try this out
- side note i drew this on my phone sooo not the best conditions lol

>>8038866
The art looks like it was made from a 13 year old kid if that's what you are going for. High /int/
>>8038957
/adv/

50k and 400k dm me

File: WOL.png (1.77 MB, 1329x1600)

1.77 MB PNG

>>8039367
5
>>8038957
6
>>8038866
3
>>8038375
4
>>8038333
6
>>8039112
High /int/?! Are you FUcking maaaad!?!

>>8036880
Literally the best painting in this thread. 6.
>>8038866
3, close to being a 2, not only fails at making a finished piece, but fails at using a tripcode
>>8038957
5, composition is well done, some small flaws with the proportions
>>8039367
4, had to knock down a point for generic anime girl on white background.
>>8039457
5, would be a 4 but had to bump up a point because it's clearly high effort and more interesting.

>>8039457
Mid /int/
>>8039716
Mid /int/
>>8039367
High /int/

>>8039457
>>8039693
>between 2 and 3
So it's an improvement. Nice

>>8040004
bad taste/handing out ratings like candy

>>8040462
pyw

File: Girls.jpg (3.81 MB, 3003x7717)

3.81 MB JPG

Why not, here are the sprites in my VN I'm working on (about 12 identical sisters), I was going more for being clear about what their gimmicks are and their emotions rather than actual quality.

>>8040476
low /int/

>>8040467
Already did, wont point it out. I was ranked mid /int/

File: evil cat man.jpg (572 KB, 2304x2591)

572 KB JPG

I sketched this out in like 2 minutes am i gmi

>>8040543
talent

>>8040546
really?

>>8040547
it'd be quite blackpilling otherwise

>>8040551
What do you mean? It's not THAT good for a quick pencil sketch is it?

>>8035556
/LowBeg/ Fauxanime shit
>>8036434
Furryshit automatic /beg/
>>8036559
More fauxanimeshit /beg/
>>8037383
/Low beg/
>>8037779
Traced AI fauxanimeshit /low beg/
>>8037889
Pedoshit

Anime is a crutch for people that can't actually draw and try to use symbols instead of actual shapes to give the illusion that they can.

>>8040710
retard

>>8040710
PYW

File: 1765290917356112.png (231 KB, 315x384)

231 KB PNG

>>8040710
Legendarily Based.

File: 1698759862274682.png (137 KB, 500x430)

137 KB PNG

>>8040885
Based on retardation

File: RDT_20260809_151550209574(...).jpg (345 KB, 718x1024)

345 KB JPG

>>8039112
High freakin praise, i didnt even think my art will ever be at that level.
>>8039457
this was more in line with what i thought my art would rank on the scale, but still that's so kind of you
>>8039693
well the composition is only "well done" because i took heavy reference from another art piece, would that bump my score down? i've attached reference pic

>>8042262
Yeah, it does. You did a shit job using that reference.

File: 1788977217401442.jpg (1.26 MB, 2048x1536)

1.26 MB JPG

>>8038267
>the line work is pretty weak
>ifykyk
Assume I don't know. What needs work (keeping in mind this is traditionally inked because I'm a dinosaur)

File: datenite.gif (435 KB, 1006x760)

435 KB GIF

I have degraded and accept myself

File: pika 260907 f.png (1.53 MB, 2325x3395)

1.53 MB PNG

ok
most recent digital (though sketch was in pencil)

File: lied 260910 f.jpg (1.01 MB, 2063x2866)

1.01 MB JPG

>>8042957
and trad

>>8042959
Brat needs correction

If you disagree with this post >>8040710 you reveal yourself as /beg/

>>8038375
Permastuck in high beg. Anyone who tells you that you're int is crabbing you.

>>8042986
No one asked for nodraw's opinion

>>8040543
rate me already

File: file.png (362 KB, 483x649)

362 KB PNG

>>8043025
lazy beg

>>8042907
/pro/
>>8042957
>>8042959
mid /int/
>>8042959
low /int/
>>8043027
high /int/
>>8043213
/pro/

File: pose_sona.jpg (292 KB, 1000x1333)

292 KB JPG

imagination

File: 1789877412766.jpg (67 KB, 1335x937)

67 KB JPG

>the faggots significantly underating anons all have no work
This meme is fucking BORING.

>>8044985
>imagination
/pro/
>>8045093
High /int/

>>8045157
They're called crabs for a reason.

I keep thinking this thread is power lifting general and I do a double take every time

File: Untitled214_Restored_2026(...).png (2.2 MB, 3072x3072)

2.2 MB PNG

Lay it on me i can take it

>>8045157
>>8045177
Do you expect people to post their work WITH their true to themself ratings and then have every butthurt anon that can't take crit and every drama mongering lurker with a savior complex to harass or hatestalk them and their art forever?

>>8046235
low /int/

>>8046235
5 but you need to finish your drawing or post ones that are finished.

>>8044985
You hand animating your furry porn, what the fuck is that set-up?
Probably an 8 if you actually have any frames before/after that.
>>8043213
>that feet
6
>>8046235
5, for being a weird color sketch

File: signal-2026-09-07-035424.gif (564 KB, 853x480)

564 KB GIF

>>8046449
No it’s just a sketch but I am learning animation.

It’s a light box I sometimes do rough frames on paper first. I like the inclined slope for drawing.

>>8046449
>>that feet
It's a VN sprite, the feet are out of frame

File: redbeard.jpg (1.25 MB, 3115x4088)

1.25 MB JPG

rendered a sketch for the first time in a while

>>8043213
proportions face and colors all look really good, hand is kinda fucked up

File: IMG_4587.jpg (516 KB, 2160x2635)

516 KB JPG

whats the damage yall how bad is it?

File: IMG_4838.jpg (1.1 MB, 2160x2880)

1.1 MB JPG

>>8047109
some of my other work

File: Bluenose.jpg (233 KB, 1280x960)

233 KB JPG

Do models count as artwork here? If so, this is the Bluenose, a model that I helped my Opa make many years ago.

>>8047110
>>8047109
I'm no artist, so my opinion may not matter to you as much as other folk, but I think your work is amazing. There is depth, emotion in your work.

>>8036948
It doesn't make a difference and my monitor has high brightness

File: Untitled214_Restored2_202(...).png (2.54 MB, 3072x3072)

2.54 MB PNG

>>8046235
I just finished it criticism?

File: merc wip.jpg (25 KB, 372x537)

25 KB JPG

merc wip

>>8047333
0

File: renamonsmetch.png (422 KB, 648x1092)

422 KB PNG

Deduct points because its just a sketch, I wanna see if my self-assessment matches up with what other people think.

>>8047293
The strand of hair going into the drool looks very strange. I'd play with moving those around some to separate them a bit. Otherwise looks great. Add a pinky though before you're accused of AI.

>>8047364
Sucks how common mistakes can be interpreted as ai thanks btw

>>8047333
amazing stuff

>>8036980
what drugs do you eat for breakfast

>>8047351
I'm deducting points because Renamon doesn't look like that

>>8047351
Could be pro but debuffed to high /int/
>>8047333
/pro/
>>8047293
mid /int/
>>8047140
/adv/
>>8047109
>>8047110
mid /int/
>>8046600
/pro/

>>8048566
/beg/

>>8047140
>Do models count as artwork here?
NO

>>8048569
Lol

>>8048568
/pro/

File: 1789061395317576.jpg (3.96 MB, 2572x3600)

3.96 MB JPG

>>8042837
nta but the line work on its own is pretty good actually. My main critique would be the the lack of visual hierarchy with the inking though. As it stands, it's very hard to parse at a quick glace, i don't know where to look. For a complex illustration like this it would be better to increase the contrast to areas that the viewer should be focusing on. For example, most of the heroine's figure should be darker, in hard shadow to draw away from her, and then the busy linework on the dragon's face scales could be removed to bring it out of the mid tones and into a highlight.
Here's a shitty ms paint job of what im talking about.

File: shading practicex.jpg (887 KB, 2048x4096)

887 KB JPG

am i int yet

>>8048711
low /int/
>>8049603
mid /int/

>>8049603
too many copies to tell, where's your original stuff?

>>8049623
I haven created anything original for a while i want to learn shading so i can finally go for perspective and scenes.

File: IMG_6506.jpg (510 KB, 1500x1273)

510 KB JPG

still life

>>8049659
not int.

File: KED.jpg (278 KB, 1223x1600)

278 KB JPG

Please rate me

>>8049799
same angle sameface detected. not int.

>>8037752
Hiii let's be friends i kinda draw this way too I can't post images for some reason. Do you have discord?

File: 1762054250881.jpg (1.7 MB, 2500x3000)

1.7 MB JPG

How bad is the shading on the character? Does it look ok? Or it's too over the place? Don't comment on the background, i know it's all wrong

>>8050957
The shading looks good, I think you have to work on the character posing and being less stiff next

>>8051233
/pro/
>>8050957
low /int/
>>8049799
low /int/
>>8049667
high /int/

>>8047333
Best art I've seen a long time. Blog?

>>8051233
/godlike/