Post your stuff. Get rated. Rate others. Self explanitory.Old thread:>>8012690
>>8035500Rate and crits?
>>8035506Mid to high beg. Bit hard to judge because I can’t really read this very clearly. Work on lights, shading, clarity, and perspective. The perspective is a bit warped>>8035518Mid beg with a lot of potential. Get more familiar with basic forms if you want to draw things like this.
>>8035521Uploaded the pre-color calibration version.While I doupt this fixed any of the aforementioned mistakes it should be closer to how it looks like on my tablet.Even slight changes color grading make it look like dogshit. Also seems it does not read very well as a small image.
>>8035521you killed him...
bro that guy is not mid beg are you people fucking kiddinggod this board is insane
Computer fixed, newest work so far.
>>8035547>t.that guy
>>8035577I am not that guy.I just wanna know my rating and improve.Mid to high beg seems ight.
>>8035599I’m the one that gave the rating. Please take the ratings given to you on here with a grain of salt. They really don’t matter, people on this site are just obsessed with knowing where they stand as an artist skill wise. Just focus on the critique given and growing as an artist regardless of what is said.
>>8035919it was shit critique, i am 5547
>>8036021I don’t put in as much effort for my crits in these threads. I just contribute because I know what’s it like being a younger artist wondering where you stand skill wise.
>>8036027I don't want your crit specificallyTook the ink off this reisen and censored (she still looks great as pixelart which was a nice surprise), included the arm that I haven't done because I was conflicted about drawing the clothing folds, censored the cat girlBoth because my work is not public propertyI am hoping to get tips on blocking in painting stuff accurately from somebody who can, it drives me up a wall
Good golly gosh, the thread just started and there's already drama.
bump
>>8036062Fuck you!
>>8036171>Fuck you!NO U
>>8035500Why is nodraw bread?
>>8035500rate my shit GRAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
>>8035500fuck off had 0 replies in the old thread
literally 2 people who posted work didnt get yous, stop trolling>>8021967mid int or above, are you an actual comic artist btw?>>8022072low beg
>>8036177You’re a god damn kike!
>>8036318>You’re a god damn kike!SILENCE TAMAR!
Finished this this weekend, I think I'm backsliding.
>>8035531mid-beg>>8036054what in the schizo pixelated bukkake / beg>>8035556high beg/ low int?
son
Just started a few months ago.
>>8035500Reposting from last thread. Feel free to rate.
>>8036612i thought this was a 3d model troll post, but now i zoomed in, my bad git'd be worth seeing how you draw other things or if this is straight up painting over a 3d model render (eg instead of it being a side to side copy)mid-high int at least if referenced/copied side to side
>>8036620No 3D involved in this, it's pure painting
Rate? some advice o crit will be usefull.>>8036612High int, I really like your work, it's very creative.>>8036559mid beg, I'm not the right person to say this, but I think you need to work more on your rendering.>>8036438I can't say if they're really watercolors or digital, i bet for dig, but it looks like it was done with relaxation and fun. I like it.>>8035556Low Int. The pose is very dynamic, sexy, I like the render and it conveys a lot of energy.
this is from two years ago actually, before i started grinding.
>>8036628thansklies:33333yeahh its digital, its the maxpack watercolor pack for procreate and a special canvasthis one is with the same one
>>8035506>>8035531I can't see shit bro
>>8036757I thought those where trad.
>>8036853nooo, i find it too expensive to work with irl water stuffiesbutthe lineart is made in cspand then i port the naked file to my procreate where i dump it on a water color canvass and color it thereim however really happy to hear u thought it was trad
https://files.catbox.moe/jrr950.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/dw26li.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/a0leab.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/t386ui.png5 minutes eachalso reminder that if you dont pyw your rating doesnt count
sure it's been a while
>>8035531Try to click on it to get the full resolution image, looks clear on my monitor.
I am >>8036948 . Meant to reply to >>8036793
What do you guys think?
istg if you niggers dont say thats prebeg the rating is just inconsistent.Why do you try so hard to push int into beg?
>>8036950Prebeg
Have I improved since the last thread? geso
>>8035521High beg>>8035556Mid beg>>8036054Low beg>>8036434Pre beg>>8036559Low beg>>8036625Mid int>>8036950Beg
>>8036950Low beg towards mid begYou seem to struggle with anatomy and depicting the forms of the body in 3d. (learn to draw organic forms)The way you did her head, face and the shoulder section is actually alright tho which makes me think mid-beg.More of your work?>>8036957You seem to be a newer user. The standards for "intermediate" artist are higher than in other places.low int is like... good enough to do it as a side hustle.>>8036628Great potential. Keep it up
I’ll give ratings too if anyone wants just reply w their work
>>8035506Mid /beg/ you need anatomy practice in general but I appreciate the creative scene it looks like you understand lighting and mood but have basics to understand still>>8035556Low /int/, you have amazing rendering and some sexy spects and a lot of promise but there are some bulby anatomy issues keeping it from looking professional>>8036054Low /beg/>>8036434Low /int/, almost looks good but is really lacking sovl, maybe you need gestures>>8036438I would need to see an attempt at a more elaborate scene, this looks nice but is hard to rank. If this is a fully done image I would say try drawing with a bachkground or another building in the distance and zoom out the scene a bit. Just a little more than the main subject building would go a long way>>8036559Cute art! Mid /beg/, keep it up>>8036612>>8036625 The facial anatomy of the monsters is a bit pug-like but the detail and aura of them is awesome. High /int/, nearly rank 8 on the chart>>8036628/beg/, needs more studies
>>8036739Post new work?>>8036880Pretty neat, I like it low /int/>>8036950Mid /beg/, needs more detailed broken down studies>>8036980/beg/>>8037141Cool art but it is hard for me to know if you have a good grasp of the shape of forms. Some aspects are beg and some seem int
Ill bite. looking for critique and rating.Current Page: https://files.catbox.moe/t5kcl1.pngOld Page: https://files.catbox.moe/cu7pq3.png
Lol, a fully rendered drawing gets called lo beg, you people only embarrass yourselves.
also fucking kek, the guy who painted the dinos might as well be ruan jia in disguise and you stupid faggots are calling him <adv, he is actually ridiculously skilled but youll never concede that to him
>>8037261Full rendering =/= perfect, I have fully rendered art and I know at some point that fully rendered art was /beg/. Being able to color something in does not make it advanced
>>8037265I said he was pretty much the highest end of the chart I don't know what you are bitching about
>>8037261>Lol, a fully rendered drawing gets called lo beg, you people only embarrass yourselves.So because something is fully rendered, that automatically puts it in int/adv tier? Lol this guy
>>8037221This is the drawing im currently working on for reference: https://files.catbox.moe/y1bd34.pngI am still in the process of rendering it and painting on the clothes which im not the best at but im working on my cloth skills.
>>8037276puts it above "visibly attempts fundamentals, fails every time". The lineart is a success (i dont even need gl include the layer with line weights and hatching) and the rendering is a success, that is the definition of >mid beg. Dumb faggots cant even comprehend the catgirl sketch, and they think i cant paint a fucking pear so they tossed me into low beg, nigger i posted the pear its shit, i am not going to post good paintings here.
>>8037304You aren't low beg, but your drawings are unappealing (for multiple reasons) which drags people's impression of it down.It's high beg to low int.
>>8035531mid beg>>8035556high beg / low int>>8036054mid beg>>8036434high beg>>8036438high beg>>8036559low beg but cute>>8036612high int>>8036628mid beg>>8036880high beg>>8036950low beg
Working on this right now. I now I have redo the hands and feet. But, I'm very happy with the folds.A lot less shitty than how I used to do them.I want to contribute so I'll (You) some anon with my worthless observations in my next posts. If I don't say anything else, that probably means I don't have a high enough level of articulation to comment on anything else.
>>8036980You actually got worse, LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.>>8037180>Cool art but it is hard for me to know if you have a good grasp of the shape of forms. Some aspects are beg and some seem intNot him, but what aspects makes you think it's beg? Can you be specific?
>>8035556I would say low int. This has very nice shading, I like your expressions too. The perspective is very off. Mind you perspective is not my strong suit. I'm sure someone can explain this better but, she looks like dwarf instead of being in certain perspective.This also makes her pose very awkward. When drawing in a pose, especially where parts of the character's body is tilted in certain ways, you should try to block out the character using boxes like in pic related. (not exactly tho). Besides that, one of the arm's wrists are missing. It makes her look like she has one obese arm due to the lack of defined wrist.>>8036559Mid beg. I say that because even though the skill is low, it still has nice appeal and the thumbnail image even looks nice. This is a very cute drawing.I think you got the general shape of the subject down. But, I believe you should think about how forms interact with each others. The arm for example. It is three parts, the hand, arm, and shoulder. How you'd drawn it made it melt into one whole object. Each part should chain together and overlap each other in this position. Try to actively think how much of something should be shown or implied. The same thing about perspective in the reply above applies here.>>8036628Mid to low beg. I think you have good base for improvement, you just need some help with proportions and forms. Like the second figure's eyes are too big, making them too close together. Eyes are normally one eye apart from each other. So you can keep that in mind and that when drawing them in a three quarter view, that they keep the same height, but not the same width.Looking at skeleton and seeing how far and close things are in relation to each will help with proportions. Picking out a few things to remember like how the elbow are placed around the belly button. My post got too long :(
>>8037361>>8037380Oh and here's a comparison of the last times I drew her.Not done with the third one, but improvement?
>>8036628>>8037056>>8037175>>8037329>>8037380Thank you for your feedback!
>>8037383Looks the same, but the arm is now broken. They are nice, though
Rating is much appreciated
>>8036871>5 minutes eachHigh /int/
>>8037369>You actually got worseYou fag
>>8037369I am not sure if he is /beg/ or /int/ because we can't see faces, only an angle of one and it looks questionable whether it would look okay straight on. I also do not see a lot of chest structure on the girl, but it may be because the white armor is not shaded plus the angle. The man, I am not seeing any obviously structured anatomy, the upper-half of his body has a lot of elements that obscure the face and neck as well as even the chest, from what I can see his spine is not following through the way it should be.On the other hand, the attention to detail in the armor is amazing, the silhouettes are interesting, the style is great.This is the only work that was split and it is because I can't tell if it is someone with a lot of stylistic talent who is hiding some fundamental problems with bulkiness and with an interesting pose. I was someone as was /beg/ had a lot of natural movement to my pictures. If this artist has that but is bad at faces and structural fundamentals (body details, consistent replicatable armor details) then they need to study structural fundamentals to truly be out of being beginner because you can't look like Delgo when head-onIf they already are good at faces and body anatomy they are definitely in /int/. This was just not a clear enough picture to tell, it is the only picture I could not really see clearly the other ones I knew one way or another what I could place them at and why
Only semi-related to this thread but what exactly causes gaps like pic related?
>>8037175i will give it a trydesu i havent really dont any of the sort so it would be interestingthis thread will be here for a while so i will post it here when i do make itthansk for the advice :3>>8037329yay :DDD
>>8037520Speed is a function of experience
>>8037777Holy Checked and TRVKE
>>8037380Thank you kindly! For the perspective, I actually used CSP's 3d model reference for it (With a few tweaks) now the arm I'm 100% aware of and had no clue how to get it how I wanted it (and if someone could redline that for me that would be appreciated)
Not sure how id rate anyone else a little unsure. but any ratings or advice are heavily appreciated
>>8037383Very nice. Reminds me of the spring goddess in FOMT
>>8037889high /int/ >>8037779Mid /int/>>8037773/high/ int>>8037464/pro/>>8037419Mid /int/
>>8038114all those ratings 1-2 levels too high
>>8037889high beg>>8037779low int>>8037773architecture and atmosphere dont carry to mid int in my opinion, the human is symbol drawn and the line work is pretty weak all throughout the piece, ifykyk, low int, maybe better than the other guys, probably just different>>8037464not as polished as you can get it to be, is it? low int>>8037419low-mid beg
>>803722130 minute drawing
>>8036880>Hatemonger fanartFucking based.
>>8038332second one
>>8038332>>8038333
>>8038333>>8038332construction problems like the legs on the blue one not having the same angle at each bone: the femur on the rendered leg is going outward, on the other leg its ?? its like you thought that you should shorten both bones the same amount instead of realizing that they are getting foreshortened differently in 3d space.Very good mech-drawing skills though obviously and nice colors, low int>>8038308high beg until finished drawing is posted
>>8038308low /int/>>8038332>>8038333high /int/
>>8038375mid /int/
>>8038375High beg. Too stiff and unnatural to call int.
>>8037221 (Me)>>8037261 (Me)>>8038308 (Me)>>8038354If you want rendered check my other posts
>>8038406Oops i linked the wrong post 8037261 is not me i ment >>8037303
>>8037303>>8038406mid-high /int/
300k a year, dm me
Please rate
time to try this out- side note i drew this on my phone sooo not the best conditions lol
>>8038866The art looks like it was made from a 13 year old kid if that's what you are going for. High /int/>>8038957/adv/
50k and 400k dm me
>>80393675>>80389576>>80388663>>80383754>>80383336>>8039112High /int/?! Are you FUcking maaaad!?!
>>8036880Literally the best painting in this thread. 6.>>80388663, close to being a 2, not only fails at making a finished piece, but fails at using a tripcode >>80389575, composition is well done, some small flaws with the proportions>>80393674, had to knock down a point for generic anime girl on white background.>>80394575, would be a 4 but had to bump up a point because it's clearly high effort and more interesting.
>>8039457Mid /int/>>8039716Mid /int/>>8039367High /int/
>>8039457>>8039693>between 2 and 3So it's an improvement. Nice
>>8040004bad taste/handing out ratings like candy
>>8040462pyw
Why not, here are the sprites in my VN I'm working on (about 12 identical sisters), I was going more for being clear about what their gimmicks are and their emotions rather than actual quality.
>>8040476low /int/
>>8040467Already did, wont point it out. I was ranked mid /int/
I sketched this out in like 2 minutes am i gmi
>>8040543talent
>>8040546really?
>>8040547it'd be quite blackpilling otherwise
>>8040551What do you mean? It's not THAT good for a quick pencil sketch is it?
>>8035556/LowBeg/ Fauxanime shit>>8036434Furryshit automatic /beg/>>8036559More fauxanimeshit /beg/>>8037383/Low beg/>>8037779Traced AI fauxanimeshit /low beg/>>8037889Pedoshit Anime is a crutch for people that can't actually draw and try to use symbols instead of actual shapes to give the illusion that they can.
>>8040710retard
>>8040710PYW
>>8040710Legendarily Based.
>>8040885Based on retardation
>>8039112High freakin praise, i didnt even think my art will ever be at that level.>>8039457this was more in line with what i thought my art would rank on the scale, but still that's so kind of you>>8039693well the composition is only "well done" because i took heavy reference from another art piece, would that bump my score down? i've attached reference pic
>>8042262Yeah, it does. You did a shit job using that reference.
>>8038267>the line work is pretty weak>ifykykAssume I don't know. What needs work (keeping in mind this is traditionally inked because I'm a dinosaur)
I have degraded and accept myself
okmost recent digital (though sketch was in pencil)
>>8042957and trad
>>8042959Brat needs correction
If you disagree with this post >>8040710 you reveal yourself as /beg/
>>8038375Permastuck in high beg. Anyone who tells you that you're int is crabbing you.
>>8042986No one asked for nodraw's opinion
>>8040543rate me already
>>8043025lazy beg
>>8042907/pro/>>8042957>>8042959mid /int/>>8042959low /int/>>8043027high /int/>>8043213/pro/
imagination
>the faggots significantly underating anons all have no work This meme is fucking BORING.
>>8044985>imagination/pro/>>8045093High /int/
>>8045157They're called crabs for a reason.
I keep thinking this thread is power lifting general and I do a double take every time
Lay it on me i can take it
>>8045157>>8045177Do you expect people to post their work WITH their true to themself ratings and then have every butthurt anon that can't take crit and every drama mongering lurker with a savior complex to harass or hatestalk them and their art forever?
>>8046235low /int/
>>80462355 but you need to finish your drawing or post ones that are finished.
>>8044985You hand animating your furry porn, what the fuck is that set-up? Probably an 8 if you actually have any frames before/after that.>>8043213>that feet6>>80462355, for being a weird color sketch
>>8046449No it’s just a sketch but I am learning animation.It’s a light box I sometimes do rough frames on paper first. I like the inclined slope for drawing.
>>8046449>>that feetIt's a VN sprite, the feet are out of frame
rendered a sketch for the first time in a while>>8043213proportions face and colors all look really good, hand is kinda fucked up
whats the damage yall how bad is it?
>>8047109some of my other work
Do models count as artwork here? If so, this is the Bluenose, a model that I helped my Opa make many years ago.
>>8047110>>8047109I'm no artist, so my opinion may not matter to you as much as other folk, but I think your work is amazing. There is depth, emotion in your work.
>>8036948It doesn't make a difference and my monitor has high brightness
>>8046235I just finished it criticism?
merc wip
>>80473330
Deduct points because its just a sketch, I wanna see if my self-assessment matches up with what other people think.
>>8047293The strand of hair going into the drool looks very strange. I'd play with moving those around some to separate them a bit. Otherwise looks great. Add a pinky though before you're accused of AI.
>>8047364Sucks how common mistakes can be interpreted as ai thanks btw
>>8047333amazing stuff
>>8036980what drugs do you eat for breakfast
>>8047351I'm deducting points because Renamon doesn't look like that
>>8047351Could be pro but debuffed to high /int/ >>8047333/pro/>>8047293mid /int/>>8047140/adv/>>8047109>>8047110mid /int/>>8046600/pro/
>>8048566/beg/
>>8047140>Do models count as artwork here?NO
>>8048569Lol
>>8048568/pro/
>>8042837nta but the line work on its own is pretty good actually. My main critique would be the the lack of visual hierarchy with the inking though. As it stands, it's very hard to parse at a quick glace, i don't know where to look. For a complex illustration like this it would be better to increase the contrast to areas that the viewer should be focusing on. For example, most of the heroine's figure should be darker, in hard shadow to draw away from her, and then the busy linework on the dragon's face scales could be removed to bring it out of the mid tones and into a highlight. Here's a shitty ms paint job of what im talking about.
am i int yet
>>8048711low /int/>>8049603mid /int/
>>8049603too many copies to tell, where's your original stuff?
>>8049623I haven created anything original for a while i want to learn shading so i can finally go for perspective and scenes.
still life
>>8049659not int.
Please rate me
>>8049799same angle sameface detected. not int.
>>8037752Hiii let's be friends i kinda draw this way too I can't post images for some reason. Do you have discord?
How bad is the shading on the character? Does it look ok? Or it's too over the place? Don't comment on the background, i know it's all wrong
>>8050957The shading looks good, I think you have to work on the character posing and being less stiff next
>>8051233/pro/>>8050957low /int/ >>8049799low /int/>>8049667high /int/
>>8047333Best art I've seen a long time. Blog?
>>8051233/godlike/
>>8047333still the /goat/ standard
i wonder if andrew sonea cares that his painting is still used as a meme to this day
>>8047333 (checked)aint that the finished piece?
>>8054094low int>>8054100mid begcant wait for retards to say /godlike rotontabi/ and mid int
>>8035500Never got a ranking last thread so I’m reposting. Will draw new stuff soon.>>8049667Beautiful. High int. Post some sketches and low effort stuff also. That sort of thing gives a more accurate read on your skill level imo.>>8051233Mid int. Work on gesture. Good work though, do you have anything trad?>>8054100Mid int. Solid fundies and highly appealing. My only criticism would be that I find the thicker line weight on the hat’s silhouette to be distracting, but that’s kinda nitpicking. Maybe work on line design a little bit more. Anyways, blog?
>>8054094high /int/ >>8054100/pro/>>8056575low /int/
>>8051233dang dude this is amazing
I am happy with this one
>>8056969low /int/
>>8056975
>>8049603amazing stuff
>>8056969I’ll take it.>>8056980What?
>>8057035chicken butt
Common straight from a horrible art block I know I'm not better at all since my last power scaling but it's funny to still post
Doodled a holo, took around an hour
I mostly draw environments, but I designed some characters for an animation I was working on to make a background layout portfolio for 2D animation.
>>8057187high /beg/ >>8057445low /int/>>8057539mid /beg/
>>8049659then you're nowhere near being int
balls
I haven't posted here in a while
>>8057625High int
>>8057625>>8057736Low int* sorry about the typo.
fellas, what you're doing here is literally retarded.Goodbye.
Came here to say what this guy >>8057752 said.Could any one of you honestly convey what's the point of posting in these threads when any work gets anything ranging from beg to int? Which one of the diametrically opposed single word ratings from crabs, retards and nodraws carries more weight for you?
>>8057794it's a remenant from the concept art days of ic, when people needed a certain skill level to get hirednowadays it's just fun shitposting, as there's no barrier to entry to opening a patreon, making your own indie game or comic
>>8057752>>8057794I post random art to mog crabs and hopefully inspire begs. These ratings are pointless anyway.
>>8057794I posted here in the past years ago, it is genuinely helpful if you are incapable of judging the current skill level of your artIt helped me see when I was /beg/, when I finally reached /int/, and when I was finally high /int/ and could feel confident knowing my drawings were not turning out way shittier than I thought they were still>>8057850No you don't. I am a freak and reverse search these images often.. nothing comes up. Also most works in these threads pretty obviously are good at best and are missing the tiny professional touch of flair for a following. I think some of these people really will make it if they tryWhy even lie and discourage people, are you a saar?
>>8057994>No you don't.MY random art. Art I pick at random and not because I am actually looking for an opinion on my skills. These ratings are useless.
>>8057625>>8057743godlike*sorry for both typos
>>8057994nigga you can draw a poop with boobs and it will have 10k on instagram, shut your mouth
>>8035500Well? Is it over?
>>8058882its low /int/
If you would give anons who posted advice, what would it be?
>>8060386Keep drawing
>>8060386just draw
>>8060386Im not going to give advice to potential enemies lol.
>>8035500We back or is it over?
>>8060477Mid-beg
>>8060486Stop giving useless ratings, you absolute begtard.
>>8060477low /int/
Do you people actually read the image in the OP explaining how to evaluate drawings and assign powerlevels? a lot of these ratings are just not coherent with the way they're supposed to be given.
>>8060512huh, what might you mean? >>8060477 is obviously /int/, dont you see the uhm boobs and uh masterfully drawn hands? he mogs me to hell and back, no, matter of fact he mogs everybody to hell and back, satan had thousands of years to draw better than him, but he cant drawn because he's frozen as fuck bitch! yeah, thats /biblic/ skill right there, heaven and hell to the side and kneel, bitch.
>>8060512Enlighten us on proper grading etiquette then sir
>>8060525I don't have to, its all in the picture itself. >>8035500Rating powerlevels arent about how pretty a drawing looks, that's all up to appeal and it has more to do with style. Rating is supposed to be about the grasp the artist has on the fundamentals.
>>8060532You're so right. My bad, let me try again. >>8060477Mid-/beg/ Barely grasps anatomy and still symbol drawing.
>>8060477Low /int/ Solid forms and anatomy. Linework is really good except the hair really brings it down from being /pro/
>>8060539Thank you for being descriptive on the rating. I know the hair is fucked lol. Just started inking and went "well I'll had some lines" which turned into more and more until that
Lol
>>8060543Mid /int/
>>80605121. that rating system is retarded and useless on its own2. the majority of people here are retarded and useless beglets on their ownNow do some math.
>>8060532Oh, never mind, it seems you are just as retarded as well.
>>8060582>the majority of people here are retarded and useless beglets on their ownProjecting, I did not post in the thread but many people here have their own flair I like, no need to pajeet people into thinking their art is shit
>>8060620I'm talking about beglets being incapable of rating anything properly.Whoever is an artist that knows what he's doing and partakes in these threads unironically is retarded.
Among the inconsistency in my work this is the only digital artwork that I feel proud of
>>8037889really cute, blog? i think being called cute is a better compliment than /pro/ :)
>>8061192High /beg/ keep it up anon you are almost out of the beg valley
>>8061192low /int/>>8061251low /beg/
>>8035500R8 pls, m8's
>>8061379really cool
>>8057059chicken butt? amazing idea
>>8056575mid /beg/
>>8061367high /int/ >>8061379/pro/>>8061630/pro/
Lil ’mon
>>8036739phantom of the paradise SUCKS
>>8061744/adv/
>>8061744low /beg/
>>8061813I made it in 90 minutes, stoned out of my mind, if that makes any difference. inb4 /permabeg/
>>8061957just dumb stoner /beg/, nothing less, nothing more.
>>8036628stop giving ratings. you aren't capable of doing it.
>>8036871reminder that you are a pedophile that doesn't deserve any respect, let alone to have his art ratedkill yourself
>>8061976>no work shownopinion discarted
>>8061957Its easily mid /int/
Wich butt looks better/correct?
>>8062765a is less wrong
>>8061379Prebeg>>8061630Pro
>>8062773I see, thanks
>>8062589this is what I talk about when I say you can't trust the rating system, when the ones rating are complete beglets.
>>8062390my work>>8051233
>>8061744Great celebi pic I also agree with mid /int/I really like it in general, I hope I see more of your work here sometime
>>8062765A is pro B is beg
>>8063074>I also agree with mid /int/so you are also a beg?
>>8063085pyw
Dude's crashing out so hard over his mid beg rating he wants to end the thread by shitting it up so he can try again lol
pyw
>>8062981>unfinished sketchlow /int/ at best
>>8062981high /int/ at worst
>>8063085I am wondering why you are offended people like the celebi picturewhere did it touch you?
>>8061744>come back to infightingWutdahell, I just like to get stoned and draw cute pokemon
>>8063135It's because the drawing doesn't contain any massive tits to look at.
>>8063138Also here are some sketches
>>8063104>>8063135>>8063138the rating system is useless.you can't rate a person's skills based on one artwork and you can't use an arbitrary metric like the one in OP.
>>8063166you are uselessanon's ratings are just anon's ratings
>>8063138/pro/ could be official card art>>8063140/adv/
>>8063187useless ratings, yeah.
>>8063293seething because you got a low rating
>>8063318seething because you were called out for unironically taking these ratings seriously, even though you are a beg incapable of rating anything art related.
>>8063392Looks like that bad rating really got under your skin, huh. We all know it's just anons subjective opinions, retard.
almost everyone here is at least int or higher, why are you so mad at one anon's opinion?
I actually wonder if the anon freaking out about the ratings not mattering has a mental disorder
You are all retarded
>>8063440>waa waapick a pencil
>>8063440pyw
>>8036871In all of those the top looks like an afterthought. If you'd given them the same care, your drawings would've upped a level in my opinion. The bottoms are really nicely drawn in contrast.
>>8063413I got the same high ratings for a fucking after thought sketch as everyone else in this thread.anyone that rates unfinished sketches as high int, mid int etc. is just a beginner that more skilled artists can't possibly take seriouslyagain, my art>>8051233this thread is a joke
>>8063422>almost everyone here is at least int or higherthis is the kind of beginners I'm talking aboutthey probably do this in order to make themselves feel better about their own art as they think they are int too.
>>>/biz/62784077>>>/biz/62788079
>>8063615>>8063616It is called taking things with a grain of saltIf someone rates other art in a way I deem too generously I negate their ratingIf I post a picture I also keep in mind /beg/isms like overvisualizing how good you may be at coloring. Little do these guys know you can sketch well but struggle coloring well at all, I have seen it a million times before. Color ruining the pic and making it look high beg lol. Per thread I only take a couple ratings I get seriously out of several for reasons like theseI think maybe we should put to add at least 3 pieces in the next OP, yknow, if you want a better rating and not to be able to hide behind your most confident piece. Maybe it would give people a better ability to get crit in these threads
>>8037141Why is this skipped? Where can I find more?
>>8063710/adv/ >>8037141/pro/
>>8063615You are embarrassing yourself so much. Your scribbles are mid and your insufferable personality makes it even worse.
>>8063744>Your scribbles are midI'm glad we agree that the ratings here are dog shit and useless.
>>8063720I'm just questioning the point of these threads. It could just be a PYW thread. If people gave actual specific advice and critique it would be much better than what's going on in here.
>>8063710/beg/
>>8063710not very technically proficient, but very cute, mid /beg/ in terms of fundies, but mid /int/ in terms of SOVL
old painting attempt>>8063729i don't deserve it but thank you.>>8063771these two are the most recent, the other in the thread are older. i really regret using my art as emotional response in interpersonal conflicts since they are mocking it. but posting someone else's art would've been much worse, i don't want to be disrespectful of emotional associations.>>8063772thank you. i'm anhedonic and it's difficult to have the motivation for anything or even scribbles.
>>8063776looks like we have different definitions of anhedonia because I find your art very interesting and aesthetically pleasing, like something only someone with a well developed sense of beauty and complex inner world could create
>>8063782t-thank you. this is kind in consideration of context.this may be a paradox from seeking harder to overcome emotional anesthesia. for reference, this is a pre-insensibilisation doodle.
>>8063166the rating system is good but artists would have to post a collage with their most recent drawings with no selection whatsoever for it to work since an important point in many tiers is consistency
>>8063795maybe that's the case, your old art is very cute, but it looks a bit generic, I may be generalizing too much from a single sample, but the accessories and foreshortened poses on your newer stuff look more intentional, it's like instead of trying to make your art fit into the cute anime girl stereotype you are now building on top of the stereotype to express more complex ideas
off topic, but we need a new watercooler talk
New thread>>8064232
