>>8056561
"This thing no one wants and is actively avoided by many people, and is already shown to have a major negative impact on sales, is definitely here to stay."

I think it's triangulation, no reason to pit artists against AI., they should adopt it as another tool in their arsenal.

>>8056567
We will see. I think realistically and logically you may be right , as AI is too big to go back now, whether we like it or not. Many coding jobs require and even demand you use some amounts of AI , provided you can use it to solve their problems efficiently. Commercial art is no different, except artists have to operate under the idea of brand image and customer loyalty - which means obscuring any use of AI in the process as much as possible. It's highly likely many of the games and media you like already have AI imbedded in their pipeline , you just don't know about it, and probably will never know about it.

>>8056561
>>8056567
>>8056574
samefag

>>8056564
They just do paintovers to give the AI output a more coherent style. Or better prompted stuff that people wouldn't even recognize as AI because it doesn't fit the mold of AI art.

The stuff people don't like is the Chinese market rendermaxxed style of AI.

none of you have any idea what the industry pipeline entails but do keep up with the misinformation i guess

>>8056574
I pretty much haven't writing much code by hand since May. It's all prompting now. I lost the passion for coding. It's just a job now. I won't artificially keep it hard for me by not using AI. I'll just chill and use my free mental and time capacity to browse.

>>8056589
Share your industry knowledge Marvel-fag. In return I'll use your pronouns.

>>8056592
Why should I help you larp better lol?

>>8056574
This. Retarded crabs on ic desperately want you to believe otherwise, but AI is increasingly prevalent in the industry. Photobashing AI is the new photobashing photos/3d models. You can either adapt or stay on /ic/ F4'ing for begs to shit on for the rest of your life while everyone else is actually making a career from their art.

File: Porkig the porkening.jpg (340 KB, 784x1168)

340 KB JPG

WotC can't stop taking Ls
Let them do ai slop, it's just the thing that will finally kill them for good

File: 6rpyr2.gif (2.95 MB, 512x512)

2.95 MB GIF

>>8056564
I don't think that many people give a fuck, you got loud minorities on both sides but the average normie just hates it when it looks like shit or when they expect him to pay the same rates for slop and regular art.

You could get them to change their minds in a few years or at least bring new customers who don't care as much

SAAR THE CAT IS OUT OF A BOOTLE ONE CANNOT REDEEM THE CAT PLEASE DO THE NEEDFUL BLOODY BENCHOD BASTERD

>>8056567
Drawing isn't that complicated. AI really can't help since it it doesn't take 2 people to draw something. Theres really no use for it. Either you use humans or AI not both.

>"This is postcard artists rebelling against cameras and printers. It's over."
>"That's right fellow artists, I'm not an AI shill, I'm just an overly concerned fellow artists who talks like a shill"
How's the weather in India today?
And no one cares what WOTC do, they've stopped being a company anyone has any aspiration to work for some time ago. Better they prompt their bland homosexual images, than force anyone to draw that slop (AI or not).

>>8056667
>I don't think that many people give a fuck
I disagree, I actually think most dislike it at a base level on principle, it's just they don't care enough to actively avoid it.
It makes sense when you think about how few people actually engage with the art scene, like going to galleries or even buying real art.
The broader public like art, but they don't really care THAT much about art... however if you placed an easy way to fight back against AI in front of them, that requires little from them (like a petition signature), most would agree, I believe.

>>8056561
It's the nature of how industries evolve. They only care about making more money. Same thing happened when people moved from trad to digital, and now it's digital to AI. Why? Because money. People confuse artistry with consumerism all the time. Hopefully now the difference becomes clear to you all. People that make a living off art are forced to adapt or adopt the technology. Unfortunately given AI is an unprecedented beast unlike anything ever seen before in history, it's safe to say unless you're in the big club of billionaire elites, you're fucked in the fast approaching future.

>>8056567
It's not a tool, the ai is the artist.

oh no who will draw the Family Guy MTG crossover now

File: 1784582414258.jpg (540 KB, 1831x1068)

540 KB JPG

>>8056561
I wonder if the recent push to hire terrible woke artists who create shitty and embarrassing work was part of the process of firing them all..
>Oh we see our human led work recently hasn't been received too well (due to it being gay and embarrassing as fuck). So we're going back to basics using our new AI art direction.
Then the nerds will see a badass metal as fuck AI painting of a barbarian slaying an undead dragon, instead of pic related and just think
>You know what this is actually better.

>>8056856
>he thinks the same trannies directing that won't be directing the jewbot

>>8056856
>I wonder if the recent push to hire terrible woke artists who create shitty and embarrassing work was part of the process of firing them all..
Unless you're implying that they actually intentionally had shitty art so as to move to AI art, I'll disagree. The wotc art directors/editors are very hands on and specific with what they want. So all these gay illustrations would have been pushed by them.

>>8056856
The interracial lesbian grandma couple always gets me.

SAAARS ITS INEVITABLE THA CAT IS OUT OF THE SACK SAAAAAAAAAAAAARRSSS!!!

File: snc-452-gala-greeters.jpg (206 KB, 672x936)

206 KB JPG

>>8056856
>he doesn't know it's all trannies and faggots working at wotc
>he doesn't know wotc is kept afloat by DEI investments and other investors just playing the money game i.e. they don't give a shit about the woke cancer as long as their investment makes a plus
We are honestly entering an era of zombie companies that make no profits whatsoever but keep getting pumped with investments from ideological fronts so that other investors can gamble.

Remember; the chinese get card artwork like pic related.
Meanwhile we get either women without any tits or feminine facial features and gay ass shit and if they could they would even faggotize their dinosaurs artworks.

>>8056935
>Remember; the chinese get card artwork like pic related
You think it's great art?

>>8056561
Even an Ex Disney head is adopting AI. If you're not learning AI you will be left behind.

>>8056960
so, someone who doesn't work at a company that hasn't actually had anything to do with drawing for decades is not drawing
amazing, keep me posted, rajesh

>>8056962
Jeffrey Katzenberg is not a nobody. Also may I remind you
>85.8% of Japanese game developers use generative artificial intelligence in their work, according to a 2026 report by the Computer Entertainment Supplier's Association

I know you feel threatened by the small little pedo empire you built for yourself but face reality.

>>8056960
>Even an Ex Disney head is adopting AI.
Woha, Pajeeeety, i was regecting the slop for 5 years, but that's changes everything, if some ghoul that once worked at Disney uses it, it's literally bloody over, sars!!!
Can you redeem my open ai coupon pls?

>>8056968
How many illustrations did you complete this month so far? less than 1 I bet. You simply cannot compete with me. Sit down.

>>8056964
>berg
stopped reading

>>8056978
It's fine. You'll stop being relevant by 2030.

>>8056964
if he wasn't a nobody, you'd have used his name and not a former job position to describe him kek

File: 6a6a6f50-7b86-461e-80a7-e(...).jpg (931 KB, 672x936)

931 KB JPG

They should go back to traditional paintings and even hire beginner artists to work on their products.

>>8056979
you mean two weeks, you luddite

>>8056622
It's not art.
Just like how "tools" have gotten better to make games or CGI for movies but the quality of games and movies have only gone down.
It's just a tool for jeets like you to produce low quality products cheaper than hiring what they currently use.

>>8056964
>Jeffrey Katzenberg
>He has since founded the venture capital firm WndrCo in the same year,[1] which invests in digital media projects, and launched Quibi in 2020, a defunct short-form mobile video platform that lost US$1.35 billion in seven months.
LMAO

>>8057020
Pls stop being antisemitic!

>>8056948
what kind of retarded illiterate question is that?

the chinese artwork gets normal woman and we get trannies and gays
that's the thing

>>8056964
>Japanese game developers use generative artificial intelligence in their work

Which work? Software development with AI is basically industry standard now. But I'd expect more like 98% instead of 85.8%. They talk explicitly about art assets?

>>8057269
>They talk explicitly about art assets?

That's just the companies that disclose. Korean MMOs are already using AI art assets shamelessly and people don't care. There are already a few Anime studios proudly using AI, hell one was bought by an AI firm out the gate.

I don't get westerners hesitation for AI while people in Asia accept it. It is the west that made Anime popular both with imports and online preservation. The Japanese did not a diddly squat to preserve anime and if it wasn't for the west they'd have a major lost media problem.

Why then, does the west fear AI? This is a "problem" they have created while Asia accepts it. I know the answer....because they're all sheep that follow Sakimichan and Shadman and Gayman and Ragadagaman telling them to fear AI and reject it. Fools. They'll be left behind--THEY (the popular people) and with them are the fools who follow them blindly.

>they dont care
because no one but actual, genuine retards play korean MMOs
korean mmos are the niggers of videogames after gachaslop

>>8057286

Enough of your god damn racism. It's so old. Get a brain.
>AION 2 Enters Top 5 Most Played Games on Steam Following Official Launch
This month alone on release. They use AI assets.

The only people wanting to spill the blood of Mary over AI are trannies like you who make uninteresting art.Man....AI is not just about creating images. USE YOUR BRAIN. It can create ANYTHING you want.

>aion 2
more like aion't playing that shit

trolling and shitposting has to have a limit
if you defend korean slop you should kill yourself, faggot

File: 2iwitoli_08.jpg (41 KB, 1000x563)

41 KB JPG

>>8057290

That's fine. 400,000+ people will play it.

Anything btw. I've created several apps all for myself and spent the entire day today making a brain console to speed up my workflow. Anything you can put your mind to it, it can exist in code. The future of Software is so bright and you're still stuck in the past "baa baa"ing over muh poor softcore porn being automated. Lmao, get a clue already.

>400k retards
literally 0 people
>btw i've created are u le mad yet poopy stinky artists
korean mmos are as shallow and revolting and greedy as their own culture
the whole pay2win meme comes from kmmos because you can take any korean mmoslop and its always the SAME EXACT GAME where you can get max equips by paying
and retards go into actual debt paying for fucking digital swords and armors they cannot resell so they can epic pwn f2ps in pvp

what an absolute joke of a country
dont let me get started on kpon and moba cancer

>>8056564

AI will become the corn syrup / seed oil / "made in china" sticker of the 21st century onwards: a mark of shame and poor craftsmanship, but not one that will necessarily move the average consumer to discriminate.

i just want them to be legally required to label it, so i know what to avoid.

if AI was so cool and epic why dont companies want to ever disclose it using it?
>"because people will complain and not consume"
then maybe you should listen to your customers

>>8057296

The essential information to takeaway is, people did not downvote bomb Aion 2 because "le oh my Gawd, NCSoft used AI!? Boycott! B-because my favorite checkmark said so". And as time goes on, people will care less and less.

>>8057301
They are.
>then maybe you should listen to your customers
the trannies who don't buy their products. if it wasn't the AI you'll just go back to screaming about blacks in the story. there's no winning.

the essential information is that i accept your concession

I see you prefer to stay behind. Take care then and safer travels.

i see you are still intellectually behind
in 15 years you'll be able ti prompt yourself some IQ!

korean mmos are so behind they're still using outdated monetarization practices
no wonder slop korea's national sport is suicide

File: 1caac5827ad9e8d151225d27d(...).png (1.29 MB, 1100x1500)

1.29 MB PNG

the only thing Ai has ushered in is the era of mediocrity
so many midwits, subhumans and mental cases believing they are actually doing something and forcing other people to participate and cheer for them exactly like trannies do.
So, you can say aizealots are the trannies of technology, trying to be something they could never wrap their low iq around

>>8057322
>trannies
>technology

seeing how programmer's socks are a meme that's pretty redundant there don't cha think?

>>8057322
they can't help but spam their slop too, the wave of pure slop will be unimaginable.

>>8057322
>forcing other people to participate
Were people forced to use Photoshop at the turn of the millennium or was it just the logical next step?
>trying to be something they could never wrap their low iq around
Quite the opposite, actually.

>>8057325
technology as a whole, anon
>>8057335
it's individuals who believe Ai will finally get them to be someone but in the end they're all the same type of hyperprovocative argumentative reddit midwit trying to get the epic gotchas when people sneeze a word
living like that must be complete misery lol

File: 1789451141612765.png (973 KB, 1597x712)

973 KB PNG

The best thing you can do to spite the schizo crabs on /ic/ is to use the tech to get ahead. Photobash/trace, learn the tools and how lora models work. The people that get in on the ground floor will be like the sakimi chans of the new era, establishing social media followings and industry positions that will carry them long past the initial gold rush. We're already seeing so many people blatantly use AI and get ahead (pic related), in the end consumers don't care.

File: 1760796750363443.jpg (91 KB, 1080x1350)

91 KB JPG

>spite the schizos
>he is the schizo
mkay

>>8057350
it's too late to start with AI slop now, you can't compete against the AI bots

My news-and-politics twitter feed is a microcosm of what the future of the internet writ large will be if there isn't a course correction very soon (and, FWIW, I don't think there will be one).

When it comes to "creative" images and videos (i.e. not raw photos or videos of actual events) it's almost 100% AI slop: AI political cartoons, AI memes, AI posters, AI political parody videos. Much of the text itself is obviously written by AI, and a bunch of posts (even ones by well-known commentators who definitely used to write their own columns, books, etc.) smell like AI, but it's impossible to know for sure whether or not it was used. Among the most common type of post is one wherein the author asks Grok a question, as a sort of appeal to authority.

I pretty much never see original drawings or paintings. Nobody is drawing political cartoons or even posting drawn cartoons or caricatures. Video parodies featuring real actors are almost non-existent.

Realistic AI imagery is easy to identify. Sometimes it's just because of the content, but I think there are also tells in the way it looks. The same is true for a lot of the stylized stuff, as in the political caricatures and posters. Even normies have no trouble picking out AI graphic design.

I've never been happy about AI-generated creative content of any kind, for reasons that I think should be obvious to everyone with a modicum of intelligence and foresight. However, it's reached the point where it actually disgusts me to see it. It's everywhere. On my twitter feed, I can't escape the ugly, uncanny, awkward, alien attempts at imitating life. The memes and videos, at first amusing, now grate on me. I feel contempt for the people churning this stuff out.

It's not hard to imagine a time not long from now when you won't be able to find anything but slop on the internet, and won't be able to trust that even something without the obvious tells was, in fact, made without AI.

>>8057354
You're literally in the best time to start. Stop letting these transexuals convince you to stay a laggard.

yes bro sir come to the treasure island there is infinite treasure here and everyone is going to rich sir only poor people don't want you to come to the super secret yet public island everyone is telling you to go to get filthy rich

I wonder what makes these retards come to a slow board to shill
you've got your gazillion threads on /g/, no need to come over and shit on the street here too

it's going to be so fun seeing aitroons using ai to make money and not disclosing it and getting sued for false advertising by lawyerhappy jews (me)

>>8057372

Boy sit down you can't afford a lawyer. Stupid ass.

goyim cope

>>8057363
not very convincing, can't grow an audience these days since social media is filled with bots. no one will wanna watch my AI slop when Disney and every other media company have data centers pumping out much higher quality AI slop with millions of dollars in advertising budgets. naturally the slop market will be 99.99% bots very quickly, even if it's just by flooding the market. there's no need for a human middleman. everything will be assumed to be AI until proven otherwise by having a history of authenticity. the only safe haven will be communities who rejected AI completely.

>>8056561
ai is going to be standard for corporate art, but that shit was photobashed crap regardless. at a certain level of skill throwing out forms and refining takes about as long as prompting and tracing an ai photo, and you get a far more specific result. so unless you are ripping people off with pure gen ai crap, its a very inefficient "tool."

>>8057378

You see here is the thing...you're not Disney and that's a good thing. Disney does not own Bytedance or Alibaba who own their own models. For the first time in history the common man has an upper hand to dethrone the dinosaurs of yesteryear and you don't need millions to do it.

>>8057382
the AI slop machine has no use for the common man, you didn't respond to my argument at all.

>>8057388
The issue that nobody wants to see your "slop" is a non-issue. Learn to make things for yourself first and foremost. If you don't love what you make how can you get others to love what you make?

even nowadays i just use 4chan and the internet to trigger and bait the chatbots into replying
it's all over so might as well enjoy slopmageddon

File: 1740921716993342.png (127 KB, 411x417)

127 KB PNG

>>8057390
yeah that's what art is for, no ai needed.

>>8057392
AI art is another form of art.

>>8057371
they don't get any attention on their own boards because ragebaiting and trolling is EVERYTHING they do all day non-stop and their shitposting gets drowned out by other shitposters like them that spam non stop so a slow board is the perfect victim
also because they believe every artist is exactly the same type of soft fragile fag sissy like social media ones so they think they're going to get their wins but in the end they're just going to get trapped here desperately trying to get attention until they kill themselves.

>>8057394
sure. it's a very different kind of medium. 99% of it is pure slop so many just reject it outright.

>>8057397
Let me ask you something, do you get genuinely get (you)s on /ic/ or are you skipped over while the regulars talk about namedrops? What attention are AIbros stealing away from you unless you yourself are an infamous namedrop? Absolutely nothing.

>>8057416
TRVKE

>they are stealing attention from you
that's the only projection i needed to bait out

>>8056667
I have yet to meet a person in real life who isn't annoyed by it. My impression so far is that the majority of slop consumers are a vocal minority, chronically online and more often than not sloppers themselves.
But I'm afraid that applies mostly to the first world. SEA is pretty unhinged.

File: mak.png (68 KB, 668x644)

68 KB PNG

Doesn't help that all the AI content on social media is inorganically boosted to make it appear as if people like it and sloppers themselves will keep telling you that as if no one would know how easy it is to buy bots, followers and likes nowadays and as if the whole internet isn't just majority bots now.

>>8057603
If it wasn't the bots you'll just go back to saying X% of people online are of non-white origin. You'll keep moving the goalposts again and again and again.

>>8056564
Have you SEEN how much AI porn there is?

>>8057631
no? have you tried not browsing whatever gooner discord you crawled out of?

joke's on you
you're still brown no matter how much ai you inject

>>8057636
you're so mad lawl

>>8057627
You literally just moved the goalpost, ironically.

>>8057627
there's no such thing as people of non-white origin

>>8057627
projecting shitskin detected

insane how midwits always accuse others of sins they're guilty of
lmao

>>8057336
Nta, but boiling artists chosing digital art down to the "logical next step" is so disingenuos. You can't compare the two. Digital painting is simply another creative medium whereas becoming a prompter has little to nothing to do with creativity. When you paint digitally you do all the creative thinking, just transfered to a digital medium. You have to know your anatomy, perspective, color theory etc.. that's the appeal; you create by using those same tools and knowledge through experience but with digital tools. Can't be compared to prompting whatsoever - which is more akin to comissioning a specific painting from an artist and then claiming you made it. When you remove the creative aspects don't be surprised when artists don't "adapt". This is not a tool for the vast majority of creative people.

File: wanyi.gif (1.69 MB, 500x281)

1.69 MB GIF

>>8057719
>>8057717
>>8057703

Remain behind, chuds.

>>8057734
>becoming a prompter has little to nothing to do with creativity
You lack understanding of how ai works in 2026. You have a belief system installed by a blue checkmark without actually learning thy enemy. Therefore, nothing you say would make any sense on the modern battlefield of today.

>>8057991
This. Retarded schizos have insulated themselves for so long in their delusional bubbles they can't see how even artists more skilled than them in every aspect they aspire to be (perspective, anatomy, colors) are adopting AI as part of the workflow.

With the recent malfoid trend I see so many people photobashing AI and getting away with it. Normies are consuming and enjoying AI without even realizing it, and the people that learned the tech are now spamming the algorithm and gaining huge following/patrons because of it. All while schizos screech on here trying to drown out any mention of AI, good or bad, as if silencing the conversation will be some "win" against AI, when in reality it simply lets the people who abuse it get away with it.

>>8057988
SAAR YOU MUST REDEEM AI OR YOU WILL REMAININGS OF THE BEHIND
SAAAAAR

>>8058039
>Retarded schizos have insulated themselves for so long in their delusional bubbles they can't see how even artists more skilled than them in every aspect they aspire to be (perspective, anatomy, colors) are adopting AI as part of the workflow.
show me a single actual serious professional one you fucking lying delusional brownoid cuckold

>15 more years of this inane spam
AI is objectively a cancer

>>8058070
You don't need to be convinced, that's nobodies job. Do your own research or just keep your head in the sand.

>all the pornniggers are using AI to feed the porn addicted kids on twatter so that means all the pros do
porn is not art
same as ai images

>>8058087

You ran out of arguments. Sad.

>>8056567
The problem is that WotC can develop an AIslop model that uses data from every piece of actual MtG art, tell it to shit out a bunch of things in the style of so-and-so artist, and have some intern-tier staff "artists" do some touchups for peanuts, and call it a day. Keep in mind though that if another company trained an AI on MtG and crapped out their own competing card product clearly trained even on WotC own AIslop, WotC would go fucking nuclear.

File: catvale.jpg (659 KB, 1306x722)

659 KB JPG

>>8058070
Disney, Pixar, Blizzard, Hasbro, and Coke are all companies off the top of my head that have been caught using AI, and are doubling down on it.

Or here's a recent indie project that raised almost half a million off AI art (it's clear it's AI from their "drafts" that they now deleted). If you try to check the artists behind it, they have "Student Artists: The broader watercolor artwork and illustrations were also crafted by a group of students working under the artistic direction of Berdowska". In other words, they used AI. Go through kickstarter (sort by almost funded for a real blackpill) and you'll see many AI art projects.

But you'll just move the goalposts to "I need a 4k video of this dude being paid $100k a year by disney prompting". No one is trying to convince you to use AI, just that this shit is happening. It's so insane that to this day you'll have artists denying hpw AI is changing the landscape (for the worse), so instead of being able to do anything we have to fight the very people we need to onboard the movement to hold our politicians/AI corpos accountable.

these brownoids really expect to be taken seriously and still believe they are making everyone mad

>>8058095
I always wonder how many of the people desperately flooding the internet with their AIslop and pretending to be real artists to sell commissions are some of the very same people who used to seethe about art not being a real job or how being an artist isn't respectable.

>>8058098
Many people are envious of artists and would love for anyone making a living in the field to fail. There are many on /ic/ even. Art is a desired profession because it is fun and feeds the ego, much like being a youtuber or influencer.

>>8058095
>bunch of shit companies everybody hates and some irrelevant bullshit projects that will go nowhere
incredible
go die in a ditch darkie

>>8058174
That project will earn more than your entire life you retarded schizo. Keep seething and deluding yourself

>>8058226
Not really. lol.

Kinda sick of it

>>8057291
you are still not making anything of yourself regardless even with AI

>>8056667
>You could get them to change their minds in a few years
well yeah, the average consumer is never acting out of their own best interest, just what they were most recently manipulated into, which is why people with an inner voice have a moral duty to ensure they aren't convinced into stupid bullshit that'll harm the world in the long run

>>8056960
>learning AI
what is there to learn lol, unless you mean building your own models and running shit locally (and even then the latter is just 1 youtube video away), there's no actual skill expression, everyone who's not a drooling retard already knows by default how to use it because it requires less finesse than trying to get google to give you usable results in current day

>>8056790
>>8056960
>adapt or die chud
How much did Altman pay you this time?

>>8056564
>actively avoided by many people
as everyone already pointed out, the average person doesn't give a shit. I give a shit, and if I'm about to sit down at a restaurant and notice the menu is AI and the entire room is filled with AI posters and etc. I'm not gonna start sperging out and refuse to eat there. in that sense, it's over
>>8056561
it's more like "this thing that is making the world worse and whose proponents are constantly telling us is going to ruin our lives whether it succeeds (no jobs, slop everywhere) or fails (brings down the economy with it) is here to stay"
I mean, yeah. wouldn't you want to at least try to do something to about it? I don't know what, but I'm not going to judge people for trying

>>8057287
What are you going to do about our racism Rajeesh? Paint a dot on an elephants forehead?

>>8057363
SAARRRRRR

>>8057382
>>8057390
Learn today draw.

>>8057394
No. Pick up the pencil.

File: Peters Lair 2.jpg (936 KB, 1475x2212)

936 KB JPG

There was a time when I thought Photoshop was cheating. But I didn't care. I worked tossing boxes around at night and had limited time to draw. And my competition were wunderkidz who outclassed me artistically and lived without worrying about food or rent. My roommate had a nephew well connected with warez, and gave me Photoshop 5.5 and filters, and after many experiments, I did a 16 page story to teach myself how to craft comics by drawing bits of panels and assemble them in Photoshop.

So,in essence, I am a Natural Intelligence (as opposed to the Artificial kind) trained on my art to produce variations of a scene when needed. I also hang out in the /b/ AI threads, and occasionally you will find astounding visions as you wade through the Pokémon porn and veiny horse cocks. And I try to understand the methodology behind creating such things, the craft of prompting is an emerging art form. I would like to see what an AI 2D sculpture artist like myself would do with my art. And I imagine yelling at my AI assistant to get stuff right when I am too decrepit to draw myself.

File: 1791036326970375.jpg (139 KB, 1320x1403)

139 KB JPG

>>8057394
>>8057988
>>8058039
Catch, bitch.

>>8056960
>Ex Disney head
Katzenberg was a Jewish money guy, barely an ideas guy and whenever his ideas happened they were massive flops (like Quibi)

>>8058464
not to mention he's the reason why 2D animated feature films aren't a thing anymore and was an advisor on Biden's re-election campaign

>>8058445
. . . . . . . There's no way this is your actual take. I always respected you even if I thought your art was ugly, because it was different and yours. Shit take. Absolutely shit take.

>>8058039
You don't need to adopt AI if you don't work in the industry. You half wit

>>8058475
What kind of industry? The east or the west? Why can't you understand the "industry" is being flipped on its head?

>>8058478
the jeet is retarded who would've guessed

>>8058483

Your reply is already a surrender anyway.
>if you don't work in the industry
That's fine if you treat drawing as a hobby. Therefore AI technology shouldn't concern you as this discussion.

Move along and stay behind me.

constantly saying that others are ""losing"" arguments is an admission of defeat

in bizzaro world, sure.

>>8058495
>>8058586
The only one surrendering is you because you’re a lazy dibshit.

>>8056960
are (You) paying me to learn this shit?

>>8058781
no one's paying you anyways idiot

>>8058474
Yes, my art is different and mine. And an AI trained on my stuff building comics when the flesh puppet becomes unsustainable and I can't draw is my hope. All art is a process and the medium is the tool enacting this process. An AI cannot act on its own to generate imagery, needing parameters and guidelines in the form of prompts. Just as Bob Ross could simulate passable effects like reflections with a scrape of a pallet knife, the results of the tools' results are entirely in the hands of the wielder.

are (You) paying me to read this shit?

>>8058740

>compuuta do all work for you, you didn't do anything

You sound like a boomer, you know that, right?

No, you really are just a lazy dibshit.

I know you are but what am I? Don't say another word...I know I'm a king.

Now you’re just being stupid for (you)s.

>>8057631
>Woke WOTC is gonna now attempt to sell sexy characters/plots
I know those they license too and 3rd party will but would they themselves now honestly
>>8057273
asain culture is being submissive to authority and not going against the grain. China is the master of bootlegging shit but until their gov says something they act like its a faux pas to have an opinion.
>Korean work culture is not a good example what the standard should be

>>8057358
I can't believe I got the experience the Internet from start to finish. What a time to have been alive in.

>>8056561
'Here to stay' and... ignored. Lol

>>8057358
>My news-and-politics twitter
There’s your first problem.

>>8056564
if it is so good why don't games made with it sell?

>>8058395
I work with average people, you might even call them normies. They constantly shit on AI stuff and think it looks icky. These are 25-65 year old soi fed, vaxxmaxxed, netflix subscribing normies

>>8059904
They wouldn't even recognize AI if one would generate a "in the style of" image. They don't like the standard AI look and they think all AI generated images look like that. Consumers will consume and they don't care what it is.

>>8057111
I think those ladies are anything BUT normal. they look like weird plastic dolls.

>>8056564
/thread
the whole experiment was interesting but there's only so much you can do with making pictures from words lol
if a new AI model is invented that actually takes into account visual fundamentals like soft vs angular/negative space/gesture and flow then I think even artists would be impressed but we all no actual visual artists are ever developing this technology further because they know how intangible all of those things are

>>8060098
spotted the lgbtqtard

Cameras and printers killed artists that only made portraits and landscape paintings because you can just fucking take a picture, but this led to more crazy shit made from imagination and idiosyncratic artstyles.

AI is the same. It'll kill artists that only draw rendermaxxed pinups and fanart of popular characters doing simple stuff (like most common danbooru tags). I actually took the time to hang around AI circles and the technology is more limited than you think. They usually can't do things with too many characters, unusual characters, actions way too specific, and variations in artstyle and sho and sho on *sniff*. It also sucks for comics and animation.

So it follows that artists will adapt by doing more complex stuff, work more on OCs rather than fanart (or make fanart of more obscure characters) and they'll also be doing more comics and animation. They'll also have to learn to rely less on rendering and pure technical skill.

Again, artists that only do sexo rendermaxxed pinups, basic non-niche porn (think blowjobs, missionary position sex, idk) and that sort of stuff are done for, but the artists of the future will emerge from their destruction. Don't be doomers.

>>8061197
>They usually can't do things with too many characters

That's odd, I made illustrations with multiple characters just fine. Try spending more than 5 minutes in AI circles.

>>8061218
>didnt address rest of the post award

>>8061254
because the rest of your post is true

Have any professional artists successfully integrated AI image generation into their process?

I have tried.

I thought at least it would be good to use for references. But then when it comes down to it why not just use actual references?

I've generated hundreds of AI images - except for a temporary place holder on a web app demo - I have found no actual commercially viable usage in regards to AI image generation.

>>8061292
>Have any professional artists successfully integrated AI image generation into their process?

No because you quickly find out it makes no sense at all to do that. AI is its own skillset. You can't even feed it your own drawings because computer vision just isn't there yet unless you want to mess with control net, wasting more of your time. So drawing skills are completely worthless and it's a cope to say you'll use it in your "workflow". Yeah right, my ass.

You either draw or you do AI. There is no middleground. Sure, there are people drawing to make storyboards, but

1. Storyboards for AI...make your shit look janky. It's really only for your local use. You need to think of yourself as the director and your character as its own living, breathing actor and allow it to do its own spontaneous action. If you bring over a restrictive guide to AI like a "storyboard" you're not going to get a good result.

2. Transforming your sketches? Well at that point you might as well just use the damn AI.

So like I said, there is no middleground. It's 2 completely different skills.

>>8061197
The tools are probably going to get better and be able to do those more niche things. I used to think what you posted, but then I saw how advanced the tools for making pixel art are (just look at the AI game development subreddit). Right now making specific things is hard due to AI art being generated with nothing but long text prompts, but there's probably going to be an "AI Art Studio" which has a few more settings, and then its over. You'll be able to make those slight adjustments.

File: 1786725369463615.png (2 KB, 201x97)

2 KB PNG

>>8057631
i find it funny when someone brings up AI gen porn because the gooners disliked it enough and used -ai_generated regularly enough that the biggest porn booru did their only search change in years by adding this gaudy button right next to it so people wouldn't have to constantly add it to their searches

>>8056567
Until you have an AI that can work with your work and your work alone as reference, it's just an unethical way to derivative results.
And a copyright/reputation nightmare against you unless you're Disney or shit like that.

>>8056567
>>8061300
see >>8056803

Anyone talking about using it in their pretend workflow is lying to you. You can only do one or the other. What would be the flipping point of using AI for, let's say, getting a couple poses blocked out and then you use that as a """base""" for your art when the AI could just finish the thing and make it 30000x better than you could ever make it? There's no such thing as a drawing to AI workflow. You can only guide AI with the drawing and it does the work, not "work alongside you" stop this nonsense cope.