Italy what went wrong ?
bump
>>221818976Based Spain and Portugal.
>>221818976we produce nothing. wouldn't want to pollute
>>221819157>we produce nothingthat is not true
>>221819185*makes cross sign*Madre di Dio, this is the end of times, ugliest Ferrari ever by far
>>221819135please stop war on ukraine thanks
>>221819362You think after it's over the sanctions will be lifted off? lol
>>221819263Jony Ive spread his gayness to the exterior of the car didn't he
>>221819404sanctions its above average strike for rocket jump we need strike down
>>221819404EU lifted the sanction even on Syria so yes
>>221818976didnt buy israeli gas
>>221819185Lol they made a joint project with Renault or what ?
>>221819485They've installed the man who's loyal to them. Of course they would cancel the sanctions.
>>221819518well since you know they way you know what you have to do it will be better for everyone >>221819497they hired the ex iphone fag see >>221819454
>>221818976Abyssinian war didn't finance by itself
>>221819135algeria keeps them well fed in gas that's why
>>221820229they have spammed RES and only Trade energy with France that balances their grid with nuclear energy
sweden and france carrying, obviously france is in a league of it's own because their politicians aren't stupid cumgobbling retards who fear nuclear energy like ours
>>221818976it all started back when the soviets decided to not give a fuck about nuclear safety and indirectly gimped the energy industry in italy, making it reliant almost exclusively on imports.
>>221820800well nobody forced you to not be like France it is your own choice
>>221820514>Sweden currently has 6 operating reactors (at Forsmark: 3, Ringhals: 2, Oskarshamn: 1) with a total operable capacity of about 7 GW>No phase-out — Sweden has reversed its old phase-out policy and now strongly supports nuclear as part of a "100% fossil-free" electricity goal. New builds are planned: at least 2.5 GW by ~2035 and much larger expansion (equivalent of ~10 new large reactors) by 2045, including SMRs.seems fine to me you have not go full german
nothingthey return ETS tax
>>221820514youre forgetting that the only reason france can get away with this much nuclear energy is exactly because of the supergridyou cant stop a nuclear reactor nor can you run it at reduced capacity, it runs at 100% power all the time unless its down for maintenancethey NEED other countries to take their excess during off peak hours and on sunny daysif every european country did the same our grid would have a meltdownnuclear is a massive meme and it solves none of our modern problems
>>221822464>100 rubles have been deposited to your account
>>221822464>you cant stop a nuclear reactor nor can you run it at reduced capacity, it runs at 100% power all the timeyou sure?
>>221822498dobrij dobrij spasibo
Pretty much our entire market is owned by foreign companies and we have no say in our domestic production. I don't understand why the government doesn't make it a policy to control our energy supply and aim for low prices. Right now some company can decide they no longer feel like producing electricity and there's nothing we can do about it.
>>221819185Whatttt is thisssss???? This can’t be real it’s AI right??
>>221822515French PWRs (the majority of their fleet) routinely operate in load-following mode:They can ramp from 100% to 20-30% power in about 30 minutes, and do this twice a day when needed.They provide frequency regulation and daily/weekly load cycling.This has been standard practice in France since the 1980s, precisely because nuclear is ~65-70% of their mix. Capacity factor in France is often ~70-77% (lower than the US ~90%) exactly because they deliberately reduce output for grid balancing, not because the tech is inflexible. The impact on fuel/maintenance is minor (~1-2% capacity factor loss). Modern designs and many existing plants are capable of this. The "can't turn them down" claim is a common myth based on outdated US baseload-only operation (where it's more profitable to run flat-out).
>>221822515i shouldve worded it better in that you cant start or stop a nuclear reactor on demandbut yes, i am very certain about that (because its true)
>>221822515I think it doesn't run always on the 100% of its power, but yes. This is one of the main problems with nuclear energy. You cannot just stop it or cut it off.
>>221822555They buy up the politicians. It's called regulatory capture and it's a thing in many other countries as well.
>>221822577thanks chatgpt for spewing out more nuclear energy propagandathe reality of running nuclear reactors has been reduced to "myth" because you can bruteforce it to serve modern energy demandsi can shit through a funnel too but thats not a good way to have my daily morning shit is it
>>221822672the only problem of nuclear is that it takes 5+ years to build in that time you could have build a solar park and already get your invested money back
>>221822555muh free market...
>>2218227125 years? more like 15 lmao, stop living in your fantasy world where 75 year old technology is still viable and entire power plants can be built in 5 yearstheyre going to remove some roads here and replace them with a bicycle path, absolutely beautiful plannow have a guess as to when this very simple plan is projected to be finished?
>>221822712I mean whats the issue with solar? Not enough fumes or what?
>>221822712It's way more than that. We're going to build a new nuclear power plant of our own and if you look at the whole process so far you might as well give up. Britain has been building one since like 2015 and it's not done yet. When you look at the whole process it started in 2010.
>>221822816well you can't have energy when the sun doesn't shine other than that it is the cheapest form of energy long term
>>221822820>coastal country builds nuclear Let me guess you are trying to buils it exactly where it will leak in the sea instead of being contained in a landlocked area in case of damage.
>>221822672Did a nuclear power plant fuck your gf?
>>221822872>trying to buils it exactly where it will leak in the seathat is the whole of Netherlands tho
>>221818976>Importugal
>>221820839i wasn't even born when the anti nuclear referendum was held, don't pretend i'm the personification of italy.
>>221820229Not really, gas is mostly used for heating. It's currently the most expensive way to generate power.It's related to renewables, they are not that reliable though
>>221822872Yes its build next to the sea right next to a currently operational npp, same situation as Hinkley I think.
>>221822930-2.5 truly impressive incompetence
>>221822843>other than that it is the cheapest form of energy long termis this true taking into account rare earths?
>>221822843Sol invictus!
>>221822951Well good that its perma delayed. Get some fucking solar instead.
>>221823064>is this truethink of it logically you but it once and then it generates energy for FREE no need to burn fuel no need to pay staff FREE ps rare earths are not actually rare but they pollute to extract process PV don't have rare earths wind turbines do but wind turbines are also cheap but not as cheap as solar
>>221823174>butbuy*
>>221823174>it generates energy for FREEuntil it stops working.>but they pollute to extract processhence the question
>>221823266>until it stops working.it takes 3-5 years until you get your money back and they work another 20 years for free
>>221823266solar panels last longer than nuclear power plants
>>221822464You're fucking retarded, the whole reason why you use nuclear is to have it for base load able to run at all times. The intermittent energy sources are what decides how much needs to be exported, not the base load power sources.
>>221822563>Whatttt is thisssss???? This can’t be real it’s AI right?? it is real real
>>221823967more propagandalook up the baseload demand compared to peak and then the share of nuclear power production in franceyou are the retard here
>>221824807No propaganda about it, you're just a clueless brainwashed retard that is most likely one of those retards that think you can just remove baseload with batteries
>>221822464Holy cope.
Why are there daily threads on int now about power generation? And why are there so many solar shills?Not saying solar is bad but its being shilled like crazy by big tech and the chinks nowadays
>>221820893Ringhals is shut down or at half capacity every 6 months. Not sure if it's bad maintenance or just general incompetence
