Do women think the patriarchy exists in your country?
>>222030653The patriarchy is real, and it's dangerous, here's why.
>>222030653It exists and is completely natural. Women despise nature. That’s why they wear makeup and support abortions.
>>222030681our entire existence is anti naturego run to the woods faggot
>>222030653they love the patriarchy when it comes to men paying for dates
>>222030681Scamming culture, looking out for nr.1 all while victimizing the people below you, hazing culture, etc etc are all natural behaviours as well. Patriarchal structures are basically prison politics and then every country has imposed varying degrees of regulations on it because no one actually wants to live like that. It’s just a reptile brained holdover that we carry along with us
>no one actually wants to live like that
>>222030761>Scamming culture, looking out for nr.1 all while victimizing the people below youAmerican culture
>>222030848Most of the world operates like this. True egalitarianism and rigid anti scam policies exists barely anywhere. Just varying degrees of it. Fag mans burden
Extremely thirdie coded thread, I would not expect these flags
>>222030913You have to gulp soy by metric tons if you think egalitarianism is good. People are different, some are obviously better at some things than others. You want midgets in a basketball team just because.
>>222030653take your own conclusions
>>222030926strawman
>>222030942I suggest you look up what that means, anon.
>>222030950You made a weak argument against a position nobody holds. That's the definition of a strawman.
>>222030960The Swede clearly wants his soy gaytopia where everyone is equal because… just because its le good, which his posts clearly demonstrate.As for the >weak argumentif performance and merit aren’t the only yardsticks for the selection process in employment/education for you, then your freeloader ass deserves to be sent to a gulag in the Russian Far North.
>>222030992doubling down doesn't stop a strawman from being a strawman
>>222030719Simplistic and low IQ post.
>>222031061bro thinks he’s on the team :skull:
>>222030926That’s not what egalitarianism means. It’s the strive for making decision making be as void as possible of corruption, nepotism and coercion. You could cite your innate aversions to it as another symptom of patriarchy. On the off chance that you aren’t in fact a mob boss or dirty politician you’re essentially just arguing against principles that would objectively make your life better. Many such cases in young reactionary men. Just a knee jerk reaction towards anything that might be considered unmanly or gay or whatever. Likely spurred by a hatred against women more than anything else
>>222030681If you love nature so much, move into the woods.
>>222031101Nigger, egalitarianism stems from égalité, the French word for equality. It refers to the social policy of treating everyone equally, as the name suggests. It’s the opposite of a stratified society.You redefining the word rent free in your head to mean “it’s le good thing that is against le bad thing” doesn’t change that.
>>222030653Yes we live in a Matriarchy
Hello can you fuck off to /pol/? Fucking hell we have back to back raids in this board by different groups.
>>222031156Right. Making sure every person recieves equal opportunities. What are we arguing about? Your midget example isn’t that at all. I mean you could in the theoretical example argue that a hypothetical, mythical dwarf could outplay NBA picks during the drafts and still be sidelined due to anti dwarf discrimination. I’m against anti dwarf discrimination. They are valid, deserve equal rights and to try out for the NBA if they so see fit. Vive la liberté and size 31 basketball shoes etc
>>222031101>It’s the strive for making decision making be as void as possible of corruption, nepotism and coercion... Which is accomplished by allowing all those things if they're done by "opressed groups" to reach some abstract notion of equality.
>>222031332Yes, not every person deserves an equal opportunity. Someone with Down’s syndrome has no place in a university for example.
Back to /pol/
>>222031335You’re talking about the american college application procedure where people with certain ethnicities have their race taken into concideration. I don’t actually agree with that one. I believe nearly all inequalities in society is downhill from sex and wealth. It’s nonsensical that for example a black student from a wealthy family should be accepted ahead of a working class Vietnamese student from a family who owns a corner shop. A fair bargain would be to have the income and living situation of the students family be the primary metric of consideration. Which would disproportionately help American black families btw and it would be the families who actually needs help
