Notice anything?
>>222080867yes the source is invisible
>>222080867why are russians so stupid?
>>222080867IQ maps of countries are fake
>>222080897because the map is fake. IQ is defined so OP's map can't happen. here's the real map
I'm not smart enough to understand.
>>222080927Ngmebub cope.
>>222080927brownoid cope
>>222080927>>222080930retards
How it feels to be Finnish on /int/
>>222080927This is true. Like, we actually do have large scale IQ testing as part of military service, but the results are not published regularly and I've only seen oblique references to it in literature.
These are confirmed russians btw>>222080897>>222080930
>>222080944The reason these maps are meaningless comes down to sampling. For cross-national IQ comparisons to be valid, you'd need equivalent sampling across every country. Same age ranges, same rural/urban balance, same socioeconomic distribution, same test administration conditions, same norming procedure. That study has never been conducted.What actually exists is a patchwork of national studies done independently, at different times, with different tests, different sample sizes, and different sampling methods. Some countries have large well-designed datasets. Others contribute a single study of a few hundred schoolchildren from one city. Lynn & Vanhanen then aggregate these as if they were directly comparable, which they aren't.To put it concretely: you cannot average a 1,200-person stratified national sample from Denmark with a 150-person urban school sample from Bulgaria and treat the result as a meaningful national IQ estimate. The methodology takes incompatible data and presents it with a false precision that the underlying studies simply don't support.
>>222081096*fennoswede
>>222080927trvkethere's no IQ tests in algeria, private or publicI'd love to see a single sourced data set they're using for us (it doesn't exist)
ahh iq map posting. one of the layers of /pol/tard posting.
>>222081174No such thing.
>>222081157the results i posted are normalizedyou are arguing against wind
>>222080897Kek
>>222081181They're using "projected data", like aptitude tests done to illiterate miners and then assuming that's the average result for nation. No wonder Africa gets marked as sub 70IQ if the test takers couldn't even understand the question or even the language it's written in.
>>222081204Normalisation doesn't fix the problem. You're normalising data that was already compromised before the normalisation was applied. If the Bulgarian input is a 150-person urban school sample and the Danish input is a proper stratified national study, normalising the outputs doesn't retroactively make those inputs equivalent. You're standardising the presentation of bad data, not correcting the data itself.TLDR: you're actually low IQ if you believe IQ maps.
>>222081204>normalizedSo forced into the assumed mold. Not really evading the accusations here.
Why does Albania always end up so low supposedly. Are they really that genetically different.
>>222081244The real tragedy is that you need high IQ to realize most IQ related "findings" are fake.
>>222081244you are a low IQ nafrinarmalized = above 1 thousand results adjusted for age income and more>>222081251i thought fins were smart?
>>222081229if they're projecting data from faulty tests then they're also projecting it geographically, this simply isn't a thing done in algeria
>>222080867Autism Vs lack of patience?
>>222081308Adjusting for age and income doesn't fix the underlying problem that the studies weren't collected equivalently across countries. If the Romanian sample is urban schoolchildren and the Dutch sample is a proper national cohort, applying correction factors to incomparable baselines doesn't produce valid comparisons."1000+ results" likely means 1000 aggregated studies, which makes it even worse. Meta-analyses are only valid when underlying studies are methodologically similar. Combining heterogeneous studies uncritically produces noise, not signal.It's like averaging restaurant reviews where some are from food critics with standardised criteria and others are from a single drunk guy who visited once, then claiming you've scientifically ranked every restaurant in Europe.
>>222081393you are arguing against yourselfthe results i posted were 1 thousand plus normalized randomized results done the same we OECD PISA scores are done
>>222081427Provide the source
>>222081427Hurry, hurry, hurry!
why doesn't poland have a single city like moscow or saint petersburg?
>>222081925>why don't peasants whose whole cultural identity was formed by centuries of localized feudalism and pan servitude have huge centralised free cities with identityidk vro
>>222081925Population size
