>I WILL MAKE VIOLENT, LOW-IQ CRIMINALS THE ONES THAT WOMEN DESIRE MOST WHILE SMART PRODUCTIVE PEOPLE WILL BE REPULSIVE TO WOMENWhy did he do this?
@mods
>>222099171I expected a Chilean flag
the current system is the result of western countries abandoning christianity and christian values though
>>222099272The previous (christian) system was built on slavery tho
>>222099171>LOW-IQ CRIMINALS THE ONES THAT WOMEN DESIRE MOSTso that they could share the blame for eating the apple.
>>222099338what kind of slavery did we have?
>>222099171Violent people protect those who they care about, so while they can be dangerous to many, to their close group of family and friends they deliver securitySmart and productive people, unless they become rich, don't provide anything to women. Yes they can have a nice job, but if this job doesn't pay particulary well above average, then they just are simply too unremarkable as a person
>>222099424SerfdomSlave catching raids
>>222099481>serfdom>finland
>>222099550Until 1826, yes. Zoomie never listened to Tiernapojat, it seems.
>>222099171Not the case in my country. Men with high SES are more likely to have children and have more children overall.
>>222099849SES?
>>222099814now we have sexual liberation with a terrible gini coefficient and worship mammon instead of God. much better, right?
>>222100065Why is god worship positive again?
>>222099877SocioEconomic Status.
>>222099849your women are BBC only
>>222099171its all apart of His plan, do not question it
>>222099171This indeed doesn't happenThat's a very old chud cope>>222100065You're crazy if you think 1700 Finland was better than 2026 Finland
>>222099171This never happened until smart, productive people became goyslop-swilling office workers. Before that women just loved rich guys
>>222100196Zainichi German actually
>>222100253no, I don't want to go back to 1700. but I don't think worshipping riches or removing societal pressure to abstain from adulterous behavior is good.
>>222099171this and genetical illness/hereditary are the things that I could never understand from that guy
>>222100465Adultery has nothing to do with sexual liberation
