Being part of a generation that was told “Wikipedia is not a source” makes it genuinely baffling to me that jobs are now telling people to just use ChatGPT for everything.
Why do you keep posting a random boxer
>>222199188why do you ask stupid questions?
>>222199223Answer the question roach
>>222199238N
>>222199302
>>222199131true. I know many people that are blatantly using it to write their scientific papers and such. that's laziness and dishonesty
>>222199131Kek I remember having a science tescher that would chud out about how Wikipedia can never be trusted and you absolutely have to read source material to understand or learn something.One thing that makes me happy about the future with AI is these gatekeeping academic fossils are irrelevant. Couldn't imagine having a comples about making knowledge more accessible to the average person just to feel elect.
>>222203002No. Laziness and dishonesty is the system that has been created to grade merit when it can't differentiate between novel scientific papers and generative AI.If you person can't tell the difference between the two, the technology has made them obsolete. The question is, how much merit should they have been given in the first place. AI isn't making things sloppier, it's highlighting the sloppiness that has been normalised for a very long time.
>>222203183Person marking*
>>222199131
>>222199188Idk but I hate seeing this image, the 01 cutting into the pocket, crossing the seam, just fucking gets my autism in high gear.
>>222199131You were told Wikipedia isn’t a source because you were in school. The purpose of school is to teach, and if you’re just copying directly from Wikipedia you’re not going to actually learn anything. The whole point of not using Wikipedia was to force you to read the same texts and sources which the Wikipedia entry cited so that you would both learn the subject matter and understand the process of researching.Your employer doesn’t really care about you learning anything, they care about how fast you can make them money. ChatGPT lets you shit out meaningless tasks at the speed of light without thinking, which is good for their bottom line.
>>222207383>if you’re just copying directly from Wikipedia you’re not going to actually learn anything.But copying from a book is a-okay? Reading isn't learning all of the sudden?
