https://moralfoundations.github.io/Take it and post results
or whatever
>>222238171Great result. Read Jonathan Haidt's book on this and you'll understand why this is based.
>>222237918
>datamining >takes 15 minutes to completeYeah, nah
>>222238392It's not a very good test to begin with tbqhBut a good one would take much longer (and be phrased better)
>>222237918>48 questionsyeah fuck off
>>222238392It never takes that long, they put up a high estimate>>222238411It's better than a lot out there desu, but the bar is low
huh
>>222238583Based empathymaxxer
>>222237918Proud soy libtard
>>222238854>>222238583Damn commies>>222238751nvm
Lol
>Culturally, English-speaking societies, namely the United States, tend to place the greatest emphasis on Liberty.That's why Anglos used to rule the world... Oh, to be a 20th century Anglo...
>>222239194'used to' is the key here
I'm ancap pilled
>>222239385>ancap>fairness, kindness
What did he meaned by this
>>222239725how would you describe yourself
>>222239824I don't know what the closest term would be, but I believe that although individualism is important, more important than that is absolute social cohesion enforced by strong leadership, without ignoring biological reality. It has some similarities to fascism, without the subjugation of the individual.
Not too sure whether fascist or communist.
>>222239194i have a white sovl.
>>222240034>white>Low in-group preferenceThat's true
>>222237918I am a right wing pro life anti communist radical btw
>>222237918kinda retarded questions ngl
I am a convinced social nationalist
>>222239725Holy gigachud
>>222240148>Right wing anticommunist>Highest values are equality and authority Explain yourself
>>222239984>a fascist state... but with freeduhms!
>>222239984It's called being a normal country with the intent of functioning beyond a single generation
>>222238583Hi
>>222237918nvm its pretty much the same result, so wtf am i now?also this quiz reeked of white-ness
>>222240335Sorry I took it over break at work so just seeing thisAuthority is because I had a lot of slightly agree and slightly disagree because a lot of the questions weren't important except to muh dignity fagsEquality is because communism is anti equality and the progressive socialists taking the quiz are delusional to the core as just a universal general truth about them not related to this specific thingAlso the questions were often kind of retarded either due to the quiz maker's slant or them trying really hard to have it be less questionsI think both antivaxxers(controversially for 4chan - and worse I hate vax mandate fags too so I can't get any contrarian points from it) and fent fiends are retarded but I could FEEL the midwit seethe in that question. It was also double retarded because neither are actually directly related to "public health" and are explicitly matters of personal health. So I said strongly interfere or whatever because I fucking hate fentards, but I would strongly disagree with vax mandates at the same time and didn't ever bother to get vaxxed myself even though I think anti vaxxers are retarded. Then at the same time I think the smallpox eradication effort was right to basically kidnap random tribals and force them to get the smallpox vax to eradicate it, even though it was without their consent and I'm sure some people died of mandatory smallpox vax and they were bothering people who they had no legitimate governance over. Basically I'm simply 2intelligent for personality tests even though I like them.
>>222237918Seems abut right.
>>222238431Pole struggles with reading, who woulda thunk ;^)
>>222237918Idk how to answer these. Like the 25th question says "it SHOULD be more important to protect privacy than use surveillance to catch terrorists" but i don't believe in the word "should" nor morality as a whole, and I'd absolutely use it to spy on my citizens and would heavily encourage it if i was a leader and deride other leaders for not exploiting it, but i don't like it currently because I'm a plebian.
guess i'm a communist
>>222237918wisdom is gained by making mistakesdoing good or evil is cyclicalthe Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao
It's like.. OK, sure, now what
>>222243499Okay i tried to answer these assuming I'm the leader of my shithole and accounting for factors like terrorism, poverty, pisslamists, jihadis, ignorance, etc. These would be different if i was contemplating how best to run Norway (resign/kms) obv
too many question about """morals"""
>>222237918wtf does that mean where do i lign up in the political scale
>>222244119true this test is a spookfest all the way down
damn
i've become a bit conservative as i got older
>>222237918So, what is my ideology?
>>222245058turd worlder
>>222237918>should society...>it's socially unacceptable to...>a better society would...idgas, neither does teh society we live in give a shit about my opinion
>>222245058I can't be analysed in the American context>>222245094Why?
>>222245104thats why i think these moral foundations are retardedit ignores why morals exist and how they came to be in the first place and tries to morph them into something they never were or will be. also this thing overuses 'we live in a society' type abstractions
>>222244404good goyim
love me authority, ate care, simple as
>>222245192These kind of tests simply evaluate the mood the people answering them have at the exact moment of taking them. It's not like very general sentiments don't flip when someone stubs his toe.
>>222245470this is why most 'social science' studies dont work. and the few that semi-work are those where they essentially lie to the participants and tell them theyre measuring X while secretly measuring something completely different.
>>222245429Faggot
what the fugggg
>>222244404holy gigahitler
>Care>Public welfare, tolerance of misfits, mercy towards wrongdoers, politeness, pacifism, emotional openness, and childhood innocence.>In-Group Loyalty>Self-sacrifice, nativism, national sovereignty, tradition, family-unity, natalism, and social cohesion.
>>222237918Whatever this means
