>'If you don't take a job as a prostitute, we can stop your benefits'>A 25-year-old waitress who turned down a job providing "sexual services'' at a brothel in Berlin faces possible cuts to her unemployment benefit under laws introduced this year.>Prostitution was legalised in Germany just over two years ago and brothel owners – who must pay tax and employee health insurance – were granted access to official databases of jobseekers.>The waitress, an unemployed information technology professional, had said that she was willing to work in a bar at night and had worked in a cafe.>She received a letter from the job centre telling her that an employer was interested in her "profile'' and that she should ring them. Only on doing so did the woman, who has not been identified for legal reasons, realise that she was calling a brothel.>Under Germany's welfare reforms, any woman under 55 who has been out of work for more than a year can be forced to take an available job – including in the sex industry – or lose her unemployment benefit. Last month German unemployment rose for the 11th consecutive month to 4.5 million, taking the number out of work to its highest since reunification in 1990.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/1482371/If-you-dont-take-a-job-as-a-prostitute-we-can-stop-your-benefits.htmlwhy are g*Rmans like this?
>>222241020Um sex work is real work chud
Do it again Bomber Harris
Looks like comfort women are back on the menu.
>>222241020>Sex work is a job like any other>Noooooo, not like that
>>222241020There is nothing wrong with this
>>222241020at least she's not speaking german
is prostitution really much worse than most jobs?she should have taken the kaczynski pill a long time ago
Kek, imagine having the government as your pimp.
>>222241020The problem here isn't prostitution, it's forced employment.
>>222241020Demonic.
>>222241020That's actually kind of hot.
>>222241103Kek
>>222241020
>>222241020>Unemployed>WaitressSo which is it
>>222241232It's not forced, you just don't get unemployment gibs if you turn down job offers. If you fund it yourself you can neet as much as you please
>>222241103Kök
>>222241103kek
>>222241020Just refuse? What is the problem?
>>222241020>any woman under 55 who has been out of work for more than a year can be forced to take an available job – including in the sex industryIsn't this rape?
>>222241020it's just a job like any other innit she shouldn't be ashamed slay queen or whatever
>>222241179It is because she'll be forced to take fat ugly bald man as clientsVery few escorts have the possibility to choose tolerable clients
>>222243753that's just regular customer service, she'd have as much of a reason to complain if she landed the tech support job in some call center
>>222241020lmao
>>222243862No, anon. You don't get the absolute humiliation that is to sleep with a fat boomer
... femboys and troonies most affected?
>>222243908>humiliationthat's just low-end employment in general, no reason to think women are special
>>222244038I used to escort and I can tell you that it's worse generally.
>>222244064A gay escort?
>>222244129Usually yes
>>222244064I can kind of picture that gay boomers in brazil might be more abusive than their first world hetero counterparts
>>222244173I'm talking about appearance aloneI could overpower all of my clients with XZero effort
>>222244173>has never seen German porn
>>222244187This seems like a male escorting problem. Why would a woman care if she's forced to submit to a man who almost invariably could overpower her anyway?
>>222244514Because it's dangerous for them
>>222241020deboonked btw.
>>222241020I'm thinking bases
>>222241103lol
>>222241020BasedFuxk the lazy parasite bitch
>>222241020100 euros it's a normal bartending job, but in a brothel (didn't read)
OP is quite the trollhttps://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hot-jobs/>from 2005>not even true
>>222246435>www.snopes.com
>>222246435>>222246582what caused people to dislike snopes?are people just mad they cant spam rtnews shit as factual without someone debooonking them?
>>222247469There's a deeper reason than that
>>222247496whats the reason?
>>222241020this is a good thing. why are you complaining about this
>>222247469"Fact checking" isn't bad when it's a simple case of "this is an urban legend that never really happened." The issue is when there's some room for bias and subjectivity, e.g. a political statement being rated as "mostly false," because one can easily argue about the degree of falseness.
>>222247618They've drifted way past their scope as a search engine for factoids and rather do a lot of undisciplined creative writing with obvious slants to it."1kg of air weighs less than 1kg of iron" is what Snopes is designed to deboonk, yet for some reason they choose to play the elementary natural science educator for people who didn't ask on topics they cannot analyse at all precisely.So people dislike Snopes because of specific biased analyses, or because Snopes as a whole is a more subtle lying politically and financially motivated actor than themselves.
>>222241103LOLE
>>222247469DOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKEDOGFUCKINGCHILDRAPEDFAT FUCKING KIKE
>>222249161schnauze dummer finnensauliegts mal wieder falsch mit deiner paranoia
>>222241020Reading this gave me a bonerSomething super duper hot about the idea of women being forced into sexual slavery
>>222241020Is sex work and prostitution a form of rape since it's done under economic coercion?
