First woman in space. She now writes book on evil of homosexuality.
>>222402411Wow, Sind l really let herself go. Based, tho.
>>222402439*Sindel
>>222402411All woman deep down are homophobic, if they arent they are unwell or abnormal. Deep down all woman bear some resentment to the idea some man are simply incapable of being attrracted or giving attention to them, try being a gay that doesnt suck off to woman and see where that gets ya
>>222402411>She now writes book on evil of homosexuality.God bless her
>>222402472Even the progressive ones are. They'll virtue signal in public and show their disgust in private.
>>222402472Then how come foids love gay friends?
>>222402472She's Russian, the only homosexuality they know is rape. They can't even fathom a same sex couple willingly starting a loving relationship.
she looks like Cruella but fat
>>222402411Would
The postflight reports for her space mission are pretty misogynistic and describe her performance as meh.
>>222402411She encountered the gay niggers from outer space
>>222402649They don't view fags as men. Same reason why they immediately call a man a fag if he doesn't do what she wants.
>>222402718what does «meh» mean to you
>>222402669They have fags all over russia but they have to real down low about it
>>222402411>On the morning of 16 June 1963, Tereshkova and her backup Solovyova were both dressed in spacesuits and taken to the launch pad by bus. Following the tradition set by Gagarin, Tereshkova also urinated on the bus tire, becoming the first woman to do so.
>>222402837Women think all men that are not Chads are background characters
>>222402981Specifically she didn't follow a lot of the flight procedures properly and in general was a bit retarded. In any case no woman went into space again for the next 20 years.
>NASA had planned to recruit a group of female astronauts known as the Mercury Nine. The plan was cancelled after John Glenn testified before Congress and voiced his opposition to flying women in space, and in any case it was mandatory for an astronaut to be a military test pilot and there were no women who fit that bill.>The first female astronauts recruited were Sally Ride and Judy Resnik in the NASA astronaut class of 1978.[9]
>>222404592She couldn't get past the Van Allen belt so she wasn't even in space really
>>222404682>>222404592in such fairness Soviet manned spacecraft were a lot more automated than American ones and the pilot didn't need so many flying skills. Vostok was completely flown on autopilot unless it failed in which case the cosmonaut could use a code to unlock manual control.
>>222402411i dont respect those russian astronauts of those times they all got their jobs by being a bigger scumbag in the communist party than the other guy. unlike the gemini/apollo dudes that got their jobs by getting shit done and being alpha
>>222404682in the for all mankind show they start launching foids after the russians launch a foid to the moon and the foids are based on those mercury nineits a pretty good show, atleast seasons 1-2. 3 is meh but servicable
>>222402411All of her "achievements" are just being a woman.
She looks pleasant and balanced
>>222402411still wearing that star that Lenin gave her
>>222402411>Most grand slams won for women>Would always come up in the "umm akhtually" type arguments in tennis for grand slam wins>Hates benders >Same people that praise her also have to hate her
>>222409350Lenin died in the 1920s
>>222402411Russians have socially evolved backwards somehow, the same people that used to shoot rockets into space and banished religion are currently having a satanism panic
>>222405961as he said, Soviet spacecraft were mostly automated and you didn't need as much piloting skills. theoretically anyone could fly in one with some basic training. that said, even with that Tereshkova's performance on Vostok 6 was bleh and she did not follow a lot of the flight procedures properly, after she landed she went to some farmer's house and asked for food against the doctors' directions because she was hungry and found the food carried on the spacecraft to be nasty-tasting. While waiting for the recovery crews to pick her up she also hastily scribbled down a bunch of in-flight records she'd neglected to do while in orbit.
>>222410054They never did like the gays though
>>222410175You don't have to pretent do believe in fairy tale stories to justify being homophobic. Btw Russia was one of the first countries to decriminalize homosexuality in back 1917. It was Stalin who brought the mistreatment back
The next female in space was Svetlana Savitskaya, who flew to Salyut 7 in 1983 because they needed to get a woman up before Sally Ride flew first. Also worth noting that the '78 NASA astronaut class had the first black astronauts (Guion Bluford and Ron McNair) and the Soviets also had to fly a black Cuban cosmonaut first so they could claim that one. Savitskaya was also the daughter of a high ranking Soviet air force officer and an extremely loyal communist.
>>222410305We've also imported homophobia and absolutism from the west with Peter the Great.
>>222410137honestly most of those missions from either side were kinda 'easy' in the sense that the astronaunts didnt do anything particularly challanging, i dont think even stuff like the recent artemis mission involved much hard work.most of perception of it being a 'hard' job is from them sniffing their own farts for the sake of prestige of who gets to go because theres so few missions and so many want them so they want it to feel 'deserved'. the only parts that were actually hard and required lots of training is the lunar landing, lunar ascent+rendezvous and suborbital docking. basically the shit that wasnt automated and had time/fuel constraints. as for the rest of the missions like basic suborbital flights/couple orbits and deorbit they mostly could send any healthy untrained dude and just tell him what to do on the way
>>222410137Soyuz didn't have any provision for manual docking, a few times when the docking system failed they had to abort the mission. Apollo for contrast, while it could fly on autopilot, required manual control to dock with stuff.
>>222410410>the lunar landing, lunar ascent+rendezvous and suborbital dockingwhich didn't happen irl
>>222402411did she see sodomy in space?cosmonaut docking?gay Ayys?
>>222410445im talking about apollo 11-17 except 13
Prior to her Shuttle flight in 1983 Ride was asked by a fairly clueless male medical tech how many sanitary napkins she would need on the mission. He asked if 50 was enough. Ride replied "You can cut that down by about half."
>>222403194wtf, she looked like Yuri Khoy
>>222410137>after she landed she went to some farmer's house and asked for food against the doctors' directions because she was hungry and found the food carried on the spacecraft to be nasty-tasting.one thinks being Russian you would be used to going hungry and whatever food there was was nearly inedible
>>222410410>i dont think even stuff like the recent artemis mission involved much hard work.Now, no. Space flight is a known quantity. Back then it was a huge question mark.
>>222405961you will see the shitshow surrounding Voskhod 1's crew selection>one cosmonaut is denied to fly because he was a Jew>another is denied to fly because his father was shot in the Stalin era purges>Konstantin Feoktistov made the mission but was considered suspect since he refused to become a CPSU member
>>222402411I just think it's funny how she's long since buried all the Mercury and Vostok guys, and lots of later Apollo/Soyuz people as well. Also, the mission itself took some guts. You had to actually get ejected from the capsule while it was making its final descent, and then you would parachute down to earth (the capsule itself made a very rough landing). She was selected to make the "woman" first, but also because she had parachuting experience.>>222402718It was, but they kept it quiet at the time to puff themselves up. The official reports on the others' performances were "excellent", "very good" etc, whereas she was officially rated as "adequete".>>222411117Voskhod 1 (literally "Sunrise 1" or "Dawn 1") is a very interesting mission that no one ever talks about, would like to discuss further.-Mission Leader survives this one and is later burned to a fine black crisp in Soyuz 1-first human mission with multiple crew members aboard a single spacecraft-NO SPACE SUITS, to conserve space inside the tiny capsule for 3 bodies. If there's a leak, you're all fucked.-The doctor guy (Yegorov? IIRC) got in just due to nepotism or playing nice. The other stuff you mentioned were factors I'm sure. Feoktistov has a crater on the far side of the Moon named in his honor.
>>222411014you're talking about something else, they speculated that humans might lose consciousness or lose their senses in microgravity there were a lot more scenarios they considered because they just didnt know anythingthe missions were still 'easy' they were just very dangerous (due to the rockets used being new and barely tested) and had a lot of unknowns. most of the missions were just dumb busiwork on the part of the astronaunts while the main thing being tested was the spacecraft and not them>>222411117their space program is like the clash of colossal once-in-a-generation type talent with colossal communist retardation and corruption. im convined if russia was an open free market country with a nasa-style space-agency at the time with people like korolev they'd have spacex-level tech in the 90s. some of the designs are so good that the US is still flying variants of the energia's rockets todayeven with roscosmos they still have top talent and are still trying to innovate with no funding and i bet shitton of corruption. i was kinda rooting for the roscosmos TEM spacecraft which isnt cancelled but i think its constantly being delayed and now nasa announced SR-1 freedom which is like the US version of the same concept which is nice.
>>222411117>There was no crew abort or escape system on Voskhod in the event of a launch vehicle malfunction, at least not until late in the launch after shroud jettison when the descent module could be ejected. Although the R-7's reliability was considerably better by 1964, a failure early in the launch was still a possibility. As the Voskhod 1 crew rode to the top of the gantry on LC-1, they were able to look out across the steppe which was strewn with booster debris from previous failed launches.[2]
>>222402411she was literally a factory worker with no experience in any kind of aircraft. the soviets just wanted to be first with everything, first man in space, first woman in space, first satellite. and so on
>>222411407As stated, she did have to have at least one concrete AVIATION skill, which she did: parachuting. Women with parachuting experience was the group that they canvassed. You are completely right about the firsts of course.It was also a joint mission with Vostok 5, the second time in history that two spacecraft with at least one crew member were in orbit as the same time. I don't know the details but I would imagine that Vostok 6 was the more passive target while Valery Bykovsky got a bit closer in Vostok 5 (did the cosmonauts have any manuevering capability on any/later Vostok missions, I don't think Gagarin did, he was just a sardine in a tin can?)
>>222411486i don't know so much. only seen like an youtube documentary on the russian space program.
>>222411407Khrushchev thought it was proof that communist not only meant prosperity but technological progress
>>222411371>>222411302there was a mix of innovative ideas like the R-7 pads allowing for extremely fast turnaround time (the pad could be reused in only 48 hours while it could take months to prepare American rockets and spacecraft for launch) and having an automated malfunction detection system to shut the booster down if a failure happened, and some very backward stuff like being unable to gimbal the main engines and needing small steering engines. until the 2010s the guidance system was also little more than a simple electromechanical device to pitch over the booster, there was no roll program and the R-7 pads contained a turntable to rotate the booster onto the desired azimuth. they switched to a proper computerized guidance system only because the old one was made in Ukraine and Russia wanted to move away from depending on them for parts when relations went south in the 2010s.
>>222411553>>222411553>until the 2010s the guidance system was also little more than a simple electromechanical device to pitch over the booster, there was no roll program and the R-7 pads contained a turntable to rotate the booster onto the desired azimuth.wtf i had no ideahow the fuck do they not have massive errors in the initial orbit if they just yolo it in the general direction with no feedback loop?honestly it was retarded to ruin relations with ukraine a lot of their stuff had components made in ukraine
>>222411654idk i guess it worked for what it needed to do
>>222402472Also they're utterly disgusted by bisexual men, even the "progressive" ones. Men are generally fine with their girlfriend being bisexual, in many cases out of fetishizing lesbian sex, but generally they simply aren't bothered by it. Women on the other hand feel genuine revulsion at the idea of a bisexual boyfriend. In the western countries at least, women are hands down the most homophobic sex.
>>222411553>and having an automated malfunction detection system to shut the booster down if a failure happenedAll Russian LVs have this, it monitors a couple different operating parameters such as engine thrust, electrical power, tank pressure, and pitch angle and sends a thrust termination command if any of these are more than about 5% off-nominal. They've never had an actual Range Safety destruct system, nor is it needed since their launch sites are not near populated areas and the booster will just impact harmlessly on the steppe.
>>222409457and she's still wearing it!
>>222402411she kind of looks like a man
