Live your myth in Mexico
>>222541566Lowkey thinking about taking a trip to Mexico because of this video
>>222541566Is this how the conquistadores were greeted?
>>222541583I think we gotta go during a festive event. Idk if this still would happen during any other day
>>222541599Kinda yeah its also the reason they got rekt. They probably thought the Spaniards were gods or algo.
It is really that easy
Post the Japs being taught how to do la quebradita in Monterrey
>>222541607Well imagine if a bunch of relatively well fed and rugged hidalgo that mogged 95% of the local males in height just showed up, it never even began for Mesocels
>>222541620Conquistadores and the indigenous were about the same height according to all bone anthropologists
>>222541657Source? Guatemalans are midgets to this day
>>222541676
>>222541676Guatemalans, the indigenous parts, have been living in survival mode under siege for centuries.
>>222541713Why is height correlated with European ancestry today?
Why is she wearing a Brazil shirt?
>>222541713Even if that claim is true, that doesn't mean the average native height today was the same back then
>>222541728That's cope, do you think Japanese are shorter than Koreans because of diet too?
>>222541765Are you dumb?
>>222541765I think that source is just cap, no way anyone would say 158 cm is tall.Hidalgo might have been poor nobles but they were nobles.Is that source AI?
>>222541782Of course it's AI, that retard can barely read
How raped do you have to be to get cucked by Koreans kek
>>222541793>>222541782You can check the source here retardshttps://www.mexicodesconocido.com.mx/la-baja-estatura-de-hernan-cortes.html
>>222541779https://www.researchgate.net/figure/HEIGHT-BY-BIRTH-DECADES-IN-EUROPEAN-REGIONS-AND-REAL-WAGES-IN-PORTUGAL_tbl1_256056186For Portugal pre-modern height was 163cm, I've no idea why your texts seems to imply 158 or thereabouts was the average.>>222541810>the majority of men in that part of the world measured an average of 1.40 meters. This is Mexipoor propaganda, shut the fuck upWhat "sources", none is linked. Anything you google from edieval Europe indicates heights were almost always above 160cm for males even in the poorest times, maybe as low 155 in southern Europe at worst>Eusebio Dávalos, illustrious homeopathic doctor???????
>>222541713Pizarro squeleton found in peru was 1.74 and he wasnt described by sources as tall. All the more since he was malnourished as a children.
>>222541602I think the rise of Kpop and Kdramas in Latin America makes passport broing possible year round
>>222541912>All the more since he was malnourished as a children.Why?
>>222541865I feel like I’m being pranked, I said the conquistadores and the mesoamericans were about the same height, you didn’t like my source so you found another one that concludes the exact same thing I originally said, and you’re still arguing. Are you stupid?. Yes 1.60>>222541779 and 1.63 are about the same
>>222541933nvm he is not even a hidalgo(or is it an hidalgo? Do people pronounce the silent hs in Spanish loanwords?)
>>222541936I was comparing a bunch of noblemen, which are taller than the average population to the average Mesoamerican.You brought up a clearly retarded source that claimed male Spaniards were 140cm tall and just uncritically repeated it.No shot Cortez would have been deemed to be tall if he was 5 cm shorter than the average pre-modern Iberian
>>222541713average height in england during this same time was 5'8/5'7 no way the spanish were 5'1/5'2 especially considering they were one of the most prosperous places of the time.If you go down a rabbit hole you will discover how much the industrial revolution stunted the height of europeans, the average person in england in the 800s was 5'7/5'8 and in the mid 1800s their height was on average 5'3/5'4 due to malnourishment and overwork.
>>222541997The first image I posted quite literally said the 1.40m average claim was dubious>>222542000why don’t you look up actual sources instead of "um I don’t believe it"
>>222542030I only know the sources about the english so that is why I am suprised.Damn the southern euro and northern euro divide was that big even then wow.
>>222541566>>222541616>camera starts filming>kiss happens>camera stopsIs this some attempt at propaganda from people who dont know that BBC gangbangs are a daily occurence?
>>222542052>Damn the southern euro and northern euro divide was that big even then wow.it seems it was bigger then than now.163cm in Portugal in 1700 cs 169cm in England at the time
test
Hidalgos werent "nobles" lmaoHidalgos were basically the Andrew tates of the ancien regime, literal fake it til You make it guysHad the conquistadors been tall, that would had been described in the conquista codexes but alas theyre actually depicted quite small compared to actual Indian elitesAlso Manolo, why don You go back to Spain?
I'd never look at women the same way again if i was Mexican
>>222542334Yeah, because you'd have to look up at them since you're 5'3 now
WE ARE FACKING UR WOMEN SENOOOR
>>222542334You are our Mexico
>>222542334Some of us had always been aware of what they’re like
>>222542334You now know why I don't care for Mexican women
>>222542312historically illiterate indio
>>222541566>gazillion videos posted everyday >not a single one attractive so far
>>222543952> unattractivegaijin part or mexican part?
