[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.222927644
File: IMG_0872.png (680 KB, 1179x2556)
680 KB PNG
 No.222927644 Archived
There are an infinite number of numbers. You can take those infinite numbers and slice them into an infinite number of infinite slices each of which can be sliced the same way ad infinitum.
>>
Anonymous
No.222927654
 No.222927654
If everyone knows there are an infinite number of numbers, why do they need a genius computer to count all the numbers? Fucking retard scientists.
>>
Anonymous
No.222927695
 No.222927695
>>222927644
>You can take those infinite numbers and slice them into an infinite number of infinite slices each of which can be sliced the same way ad infinitum.

Pretty sure that's not true and makes math hard if you roll with that assumption. A subset of infinity, while still being infinity, is still less than its parent's sequence length.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.