Just watched this after deciding not to go to Belgium. Youre right its not worth it but I enjoyed it and want to watch it again.I might go to Belgium to watch Nolans gimmick format
>>223194906i need to go to either monterrey or texas, i might jump the border to see it
>>223194906why do muslims like this movie?
>>223194906>unironically watching troondyssy
people are complaining about it being blacked and trooned but the real sin is the amount of K1K/S it hasi will NEVER watch it
>>223194906It was really good imc
>>223194906>its not worth it but I enjoyed it and want to watch it again
>>223197752Yes I am incomprehensible. I liked it and want to watch it in imax 70mm now
>>223197710Especially the cyclops scene where they stabbed the eye. That scream was amazing
>>223198052Genuinely kino, though I was a bit disappointed they didn't stay true to the story when it came to Argos at the end. It would have added a lot to the buildup for the final scene.
>die odysseeWhy are Germans so hostile?
>>223194906it was good in a funny way
>>223200000Stupid gay Brazil poster and his very gay taste in films
>>223198052tsmtI came when Odyssus said, "If I poke your eye, will you die?"; and the big guy said, "It will be very painful".
>>223194906Saw it in "real" IMAX. Wasn't worth driving to Pr*vidence for.
>>223194906Visuals and directing was pretty good but the story was a bit lacking imho. Saw a total of three black people throughout the whole movie, which was disappointing.
>>223201564Don't know anything about movies, but the visuals were the worst part. The film looked like every other Nolan film.
>>223201564yeah Türks are negrophiles we get it
>>223201647>Implying that gayreeks aren't any gayer
>>223201644Interstellar was pretty CGI heavy. Odyssey had none of that, I found the visuals pretty realistic, which is why I think they were good.
>>223201722I meant in terms of color grading and cinematography. I've never seen Interstellar so I can't really judge it, but looking at this still... Yeah, that's a Nolan film. Now I'm just nitpicking. I don't Nolan.
>>223201866I don't like Nolan*
>>223200389Bravo nolan
Yeah I get where you're coming from. When I do a shit that empties my guts and leaves me feeling hollow I kind of want to do it again.
>Nolan’s use of scale (the overmarketed IMAX viewing platform) perverts classical cinema as well as the literary classics. Nolan’s insensate followers — the Nolanoids — don’t appreciate great composition; their sense of aesthetics has been dulled. In their fascination with new technology, they forget what was achieved by David Lean’s enlarged aspect ratio in The Bridge on the River Kwai, Lawrence of Arabia, and Doctor Zhivago — the singular perfectionist visual craft as in Lean’s earlier small-scale movies.>Nolanoids exhibit the least sophisticated responses to image and sound, even when Nolan’s storyboards are essentially unimaginative, as in the sequences of the long-shot connecting Odysseus to Telemachus, the building of the Trojan Horse, the Cyclops that’s more Peter Jackson Halloweenish than Ray Harryhausen fantastic, and Odysseus strapped during the sea storm with the sirens. These don’t match the grandeur of any Zack Snyder set piece or rival the Homeric spectacles of Peckinpah’s The Wild Bunch, the statuary opening of Raymond Bernard’s Les Misérables, from 1934, or the magnificent storm in David Lean’s Ryan’s Daughter. Those sequences were not just flashy; they were emotionally expressive and visually powerful.
>>223194906I watched it with my brother and sister since we had nothing else to do and a few hours to kill. Non of us liked it, too much autism in my family and everything from the horrible armors to the fact that it's just Americans larping as greek pissed us off. It's basically marvel shit in historical format but also not historical at all because Americanized to hell. An honest 3/10 from me and I usually love Nolans films.