[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Lorica.jpg (680 KB, 1940x1448)
680 KB JPG
Which was objectively better?
>>
buckets are better
>>
>>223469979
Lorica Musculata
>>
Way less advanced/mobile than Han/Jin dynasty armors
>>
>>223469979
Both are shit
Romans always lost
>>
>>223469979
I don't know anything about ancient Rome but I find it unlikely that there were entire legions of soldiers all wearing this sort of plate armour.
>>
File: 1733768169684507.png (343 KB, 564x561)
343 KB PNG
>>223469979
The dust is settled. Why are you still asking?
>>
>>223470905
Historians suggest that it was more common than the chainmail one and was created as mass production which was faster to make than a chailmail
>>
>>223470457
won a war against no one award
>>
>>223470457
Nobody gives a shit about gooks.
Nobody cares about Gook this Gook that.
>>
>>223469979
why should I give a fuck about this cracka shit
>>
>>223472820
based
>>
>>223470457
>boiled leather armor
Kek
>>
File: 1758964491778120.jpg (3 KB, 125x125)
3 KB JPG
>>223472820
why would you say that, I even conquered the world as serbia once on eu4
>>
>>223473063
You're not gooks tho. Gooks are Chinese. Not sure what you are but keep doing whatever it is that you do.
>>
>>223470457
If the han armour was better they would not die by the hundreds of thousands in every battle
>>223470905
After the marious reform roman armour became standardizing every soldier recieved the same armour and the same gladious
But a roman army didnt consist of only legions big part of it was auxiliares
>>
File: 1771275467011933.jpg (59 KB, 478x515)
59 KB JPG
>>223470660
Pavel... don't post this with the Finnish flag.
>>
>>223470905
>>223471436
>>223473231


I have a theory. The armor display is incorrect, especially in these play pretend conventions.

Exposed metal = oxidation, rust, easy wear & tear. Even the chainmail appears criminally incorrect.

My argument is that everything – helmets, shoulder plates, torso/lorica segmentata, foot/shin plates – was covered, sewn in fabric: wool, linen, hemp, nettle, and/or leather.

The average soldiery had their tunic as primary clothing, yes, then the armor was covered in additional fabric for additional protection.

For example, I believe the lorica segmentata was sewn in, either leather, or linen dampened in waterproof oil.
It makes sense; or adorned in a chainmail pattern with scrunched/crinkled or knotted bumps made out of linen, covering the plates.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.