>you wake up in the British archipelago
Still not leaving Norfolk
>>223846414How much would water have to rise for this to happen? In any case they can build cool underwater cities. Something combining Venice and Rapture from Bioshock
>>223846414KINO. I am of the unshakable belief that the world would be better if it was made up of only small islands.
>>223846414Thought that was the Philippines for a split second
imagine living somewhere that will be flooded wit saltwater someday. cringe!!!
mashallah cymru and alba survive
>>223847445celts are chosendublinstan gots flooded doe
>>223846810As the picture says, my fellow retarded mongoloid, 104 metres above current sea level
>>223846414In my city the centre would be 20m deep into the sea and the valleys would run be flooded but nearly all the housing would be above sea level. Bring it on.
>>223846810It's hard to say what exact number they used. The elevation of London goes from 0-133 meters, so is "London + 104 m" 0+104, 134+104 or is it average elevation + 104 or some arbitrary location in London + 104. Who knows?Either way this scenario is not possible because there isn't enough water on Earth for it to rise as much. If all the frozen water on Earth melts the maximum increase in sea level is 60 something meters.
>>223847632You might be retarded son. The bits that are under 104m elevation are in blue. The rest is still above sea level.
>>223846414this looks kino tho
>>223847975Then why does it say "London + 104 m" instead of "Sea level + 104 m"?
>>223847547But the picture doesn't say that
>>223848277Brother Suomi... London is merely being pointed out on the map as a dot. Because of the rise in sea-levels, it would be difficult to find the exact location based on the shape of the country, therefore the dot is provided to help understand how much of London would be underwater.
>>223846414Leeds would become the new capital
>>223846414This is sovlfvl doe and london is dead which has made the entire country atleast 30% whiter
Scotland and Wales doing not so badly after the floodworth mentioning 100m of sea level rise would take thousands of years so don't get too worried
>>223846414In the end, the Celt won out against the Anglo. Based.
>>223846414>my house 100m above sea level is floodedOkay
>>223846964danes will never be true island dwellers until you cast off your jutlandish shackles
rightwell
>>223848971How do you know that? It would be more logical to have the "London" next to the dot if that were the case. Or anywhere else but together in the same black box with the +104m. Why do you assume it's what you think it is and not what I think it is? What logic are you applying in your thinking to make this conclusion and calling me retarded based on that?
I am reminded of a film from the 80s set in a dystopian future where London is flooded and rutger hauer is just cutting about eating tunnocks teacakesI forget what it's called
>>223852148split second, watched it last year. decent b-movie fun
