As late as 19th century, Chinese settlers in Taiwan still have violent conflicts against each other. Two fighting groups came from the same province of China. Does that happen in other countries? Does it mean that Chinese people was not a real ethnic group until then?
We did that ourselves to another group of settlers on our continent
>>223944142every conflict in human history is settlers vs settlers
>>223944142Taiwan belongs to Austronesians. It was promised to us by God, 5000 years ago. We will reclaim it and kick out the Han invaders.
>>223944173Do English settlers differentiate themselves according to places of origin? Those from London vs those from York?My main question is about the unity of China. I know it's not a nation compared to England. But was it more fragmented than, say, Japan ? They always said, despite China lacked nationalism, the state, the administration of the countryside, any two Chinese villages still belong to one nation. But they fought on Taiwan. Can I say that the two fighting villages don't belong to the same ethnic group? Or the same nation?
>>223944209You guys are so funny >muuuuh we are strong forest hunters, we fear nothing >no no, please don't eradicate us, give us some laws to protect our rights pleassssseeee
TAIWAN NO. 1
>>223944745>Do English settlers differentiate themselves according to places of origin? Those from London vs those from York?Plantation slaveowners in the Deep South did for a while but that group has been gone for a long time now
>>223944209just be glad they havent genocide your kinds yet thank to the US.
>>223944745You can have a family and still have infighting Taking this from another angle: if you have two peoples fighting each other, does the fight make them two different peoples?
