Why is it hated by both sides of the spectrum?
twitterites see that western asian fetishization is rooted in pedophiliachuds just don't like mixing in general
>>223945403>twitterites see that western asian fetishization is rooted in pedophiliaIts not rooted in pedophilia, its unironically systemic racism
>>223945448oh please, weezer was singing about wanting to fuck a barely 18yo japanese girl in like 1996it's always been an incel dogwhistle
>>223945298the low-stock men that pursue asian women were supposed to be the ones that leftists settle down with after they're done with the BBC carousel
>>223945298All women are whores, and their children are bastards.
>>223945586is your mom a whore and you a bastard?
>>223945298>"White men are fundamentally evil" is a doctrinal axiom of the modern religion of feminism and intersectionality that northwestern European whites (and the Anglosphere especially) have replaced Chrisitianity with. If white men want to participate in their own cultures, some degree of acquiescence is required of them on this respect, and self-flagellation and humiliation fetishism is indulgenced as meritorious. >"Everyone except white men are fundementally evil" is the equal and opposite reaction to this, and naturally you would expect this sentiment to arise if the aforementioned is true. So, the normal broadly northwest European white who responded to his culture with acquiescence (and is generally rewarded with social status for it) will find himself in opposition to the dissident broadly northwest European white who responded to his culture with dismissing it (and generally foregoing any social status). The reason they would both agree on the subject of interracial marriage being wrong is because the normal white man will interpret it through feminism and white men being fundamentally being evil. If a white man is with a nonwhite woman, and nothing else is known about the white man, then the question of Feminist Matrimonial Consent is up in the air. A straight relationship involving a white man will always be under suspicion of the scandal of sin against women and nonwhites, there's no getting around it. (1/2)
>>223946105You will find that the attitude of the reactionary dissident white man who sulks underneath the vast absurdity of his culture is more ephemeral and hard to pinpoint. I categorize them into the Loyal (or "Proper") Supremacists and the Cynical Supremacists. The Loyal Supremacists hold their reactionary axiom as true, and then extrapolate from that that white women must also be fundamentally good, since white men cannot exist without white women. However, this will involve constant mental gymnastics, as how they can really believe in the purity and goodness of white women next to the notoriously intense participation of white women in the culture they are reacting against might well be asked. The Cynical Supremacists likewise maintain their reactionary axiom, but they don't extrapolate any hard and fast conclusion from it. They are too depressed by the mental gymnastics required, and have accepted a general sense of doom. Therefore, any sort of prudent Epicureanism in which they can rationalize some sense of pride and self-righteousness in the face of this doom is their modus operandi. Thus you see they have no scruples with what the Loyal Supremacist might gasp in horror at, and take nonwhite mistresses, develop fetishes for nonwhites, engage in overseas nonwhite prostitution, including even desiring nonwhite catamites, often adopting fetish terms for it like "buck-breaking." They even, if it falls under their prudent Epicureanism, can become passively sodomitical catamites themselves while still rationalizing and arguing their beliefs of White Supremacy. So in summary, it is because white men and their business is a fulcrum upon which modern feminist religion as well as modern counterculture turns, and (as laid out) you have to be a stupid and barely literate thrall to really ardently be for either, and if the only other choice presented is to side with degenerates, then perhaps the numbers of both are a bit artificially inflated. (2/2)
>>223945298Does anybody outside of 4chud and r/Asianmasculinity actually use the term WMAF
>>223945609of course not
