[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HPwr92FbIAA5SbT.jpg (268 KB, 1440x1920)
268 KB JPG
what are the implications of AI being gynocentric iyc?
>>
>>223953216
Can we just get over this virtue signalling for short guys? Yeah I get it sucks but we can't dance around the subject forever and have women silently accept something they simply don't find attractive. If you really want to make an argument in favor of male preference in terms of aesthetics then you need only look at the endless debates over butt and breast size, as well as girls being fat or not

I've got manlet fatigue
>>
File: 17175120928243-334882382.jpg (256 KB, 1952x1204)
256 KB JPG
>>223953216
>>223953328
go back to Pakistan
>>
>>223953216
I haven't been to r/mensrights since they required log ins for old reddit.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.