>In 2021, UN wanted to recognize food as a human right>Only 2 countries opposed itCan you guess which ones?
>>223955305Israel and Turkey maybe
>>223955305The us and israel
>>223955305Qatar and Iran
>>223955305israel and the us
>>223955305Niggeria and Zimbabwe?
>>223955305basedfuck UN
>>223955305isn't it pretty much already? why else is the UN spending western money keeping the africans from starving
>>223955494>most humane jew
>>223955626the humane thing would be to fire a jericho missile at the UN HQ but thats technically in usa so that might not be wise
>>223955662That makes Jews enemies of mankind.
>>223955305Israel and the USA o algo
whoever they are, they are correct and rationalthere is no free lunch and you aren't entitled to other peoples money
>>223955747Duh, but we are talking about basic necessities a human needs to function, food, water, clothing, shelter, the bare minimum.
>>223955662Most humane thing would be to glass the entire Middle East, Africa and India. There would finally be world peace.
https://geneva.usmission.gov/2017/03/24/u-s-explanation-of-vote-on-the-right-to-food/TLDR: it was at best poorly written overreach that existed purely to virtue signal
>>223955692not reallybut UN was made against mankind
>>223955305Give the answer, Aslan.
>>223955305Why didn't they just make starving illegal
>>223956093>>223955342
>right to food was not about providing free food to everyone, but to charge warlords and politicians if they tried to block food aid from being delivered>israel had plans for gaza in mind, one way to shorten a hypothetical siege would be starving them out>israel goes to the nearest american representative, asks them to veto the resolution>ameridiplomats veto it, claim that that resolution would have made it so that the us would have to provide free food and agricultural tech to everyoneweird how no other country seemed to come to the same conclusion as the us after reading the resolution, despite the fact they tend to send their top legal autists, and the fact there are a bunch of countries that rely on food exports a lot more than the us and they would be hurt a lot more with a "free food" policy
>>223956309You can just read the resolution and see for yourself it's 100% virtue signalling, empty words and paragraphs upon paragraphs of "deeply concerned..." "vehemently stresses..." "strongly encourages..." political bullshit
>>223956596if it was so meaningless why vote against? owning the libs? joe biden was in office at the time, why would his administration vote against some virtue signaling if there's no negatives?
>>223956676They always vote no on these things, it's also some political/diplomatic thing. The US doesn't like the UN
>>223955305The based onesFood isn't free nigger get to work
Food is a human right, We just disagree with the pooN about which people are human.
>>223955305A human right is something innate. There is nothing innate about receiving food. Free speech is a human right because I can speak. Positive rights that compel others to act will never be human rights.
>>223955305>2 countriesThat's anti semitic!!
>>223956021You are not man
>>223957518>indog thinks theres foids on int
>>223955692They are. Wouldn't you be glad if they displayed their nature so openly? Maybe then we could unite and employ the final solution, this time for real.
>>223955305The Breadbasket who already produces the majority of the world's food (you really should pick yourself up by your bootstraps) and Israel.
