if iyc the most famous/loved historical figure suddenly revived and ran a new party, would they immediately win and become PM/president?
Yes.
>>223980388He also was a 100% concentrated power of will, so it's possible one of these days he manages to leave the underworld to put Poland in order just because he hated ineffective, fractured democracy that much.
>>223980343100%. Didn't know he was also Somali though. That's cool I guess
>>223980429What problems does Boland even have?
>>223980494Lack of political unity culminating in a judiciary crisis.
>>223980739>Lack of political unityThat's a good thing thougheveralbeit. Just federalize the Republic so decision-making and political responsibility can be further dispersed among historical regions and you'll be set
>iyc the most famous/loved historical figureI don't know who that would be nowadays, probably some retarded leftist woman. Yes she'd win.
>>223980343Nah, there isn't one person who's universally loved now. Our first elected governor did get loved by everyone, but his image's fallen hard in recent years. Our nationalist leader's image has gotten some sort of revisionism in recent years, but his reputation would sour quickly when the leftists who make up the majority of revisionists discover how right-wing/chuddy he actually was, and he's still a controversial figure among some despite not being as universally reviled like during the mid-late 20th century.
No one from the past is safe here now. Jesus himself could walk into a US city and get grabbed up by ICE and starve to death in some hellhole detention center. American Christians know this and are proud of it.
>>223980984Render to Caesar what is Caesar's. Also more brownoids died in ICE custody under based Obunga than under the current orange faggot
>>223980465didnt bother posting because the only real option that isnt over 300+ is mohammed abdullah hassan (mad mullah) and somalia has no real democracy alongside him being technically an islamist so hed never win (also he was a massive asshole)>>223980429didnt racial and political pograms happen under him?>>223980924is the average lefty view indicative of most fo your cunts population?
>>223981092my b, misunderstood what poleanon was saying.
>>223981092>is the average lefty view indicative of most fo your cunts population?No, the island is heavily conservative, especially our predominantly older population.Millennials/zoomers are more socially lax but there are some cases of tattooed trad LARPers that listen to reggaeton and preach conservative values because of "la biblia" o algo
>>223980343our former tsar became prime minister 50 years after the monarchy was abolished so anything is possible
I can't even think of an actual historic figure that's THAT popular in Switzerland. Maybe Arnold Winkelried? The guy basically threw himself onto a couple of spears so his mates could get through and kill some Austrians.Henri Guisan, the general of the swiss army during the second world war is pretty widely known but I don't think people would vote for him. It's not like he was especially competent or heroic.>inb4 Wilhelm TellThat man was probably a complete fiction.
>>223980343200%
>>223981267It's kind of impossible for you to generate Great Men(TM) because you chose the path of neutrality and republicanism early
>>223981317We have a shitton of great men that if risen could sweep into the presidency. Not just past Presidents but guys like Steve Jobs, Elvis, or Neil Armstrong would 100% percent win a Presidential election if they came back to life and had youth/vigor
>>223981317That is harder to pull off in NPC countries. Napoleon was a Corsican nationalist in his youth but got disillusioned after returning to the island and realizing that most people there were conformists with little to no ambition.
>>223981399no way. maybe older figures like bobby kenedy, john brown or patton, larger than life figures. no way ELVIS swings and multiple elections and sweeps all branches of gov.
>>223981317>earlyUp until the 1800s, "Switzerland" was basically different allied states who governed themselves. That only changed in the 1810s with Napoleon. Not to mention that swiss neutrality is also only a fairly recent phenomena, considering that these states were involved in a lot of fighting either among themselves or against foreign powers. And there was the whole mercenary business.Not to mention that there were great historical people like Calvin or Zwingli, but they aren't that well known.
>>223981092>didnt racial and political pograms happen under him?No, only against Ukrainian terrorists (unfortunately against civilians a bit too)
>>223981895>no, but also yes but only a little
bump
>>223981935Ukrainians aren't real
>>223980786This. It works as intended, power needs checks and balances. Going fully in any direction is gaytarded. There's a reason countries with centralized and unified power are shitholes. With absolutist type centralized power you can only progress to middle age feudalism type country and not much further.
>>223980343>Tommy DouglasThe NDP that he helped create would kick him out and call him a chud
