I do not think it is homophobic to have the opinion that gay people aren't necessarily the best adoptive parents(in my country)
could be worse desu
>>224285663You know I was going to clown on germoids for this but cutting kids' off because its "traditional" or to have them larp as the other gender is probably jjst as bad isn't it?
>>224285590Not like the first pics for kids but if the gays are vetted well enough to make sure they aren't abusive or pedos then it's better than letting them rot in the foster system
>>224285663that's g*rmans, not gays
>>224285715yeah, people act like vetting is impossible or something
>>224285715give them the black kids I guess
>>224285753Gotta break em in early. A zesty buck is a tamed buck I reckon. Its for their own good
>>224285753Gays often date outside their ethnic group anyway so having a multiracial family wouldn't be that big of a deal for a lot of them
>>224285751Vetting has never been enough lmao. You are expecting way too much competency on the part of the state
>>224285753>>224285787Go fuck yourself. If I ever have children I want them to look like me
>>224285821no, I'm not. it should be expected.this is why your transports suck.
>>224285831You're pardo buddy
>>224285821A lot of the gays that wanna adopt anyway are like lesbians and statistically they're waaaaaaaay less likely to molest kids than straight men. I guess we can't let straight men adopt or have kids then either.
>>224285831
it's homophobic but correct
>>224285842>>224285915I'm White of Portuguese, Spanish and German ancestry, which is a common background in the south.
>>224285590I definitely think there's some gay people that would make better parents than some straight people. I think at the end of the day treating their sexuality as the primary basis for how fit they are to be parents is inherently flawed and shouldn't be entertained seriously. Irrational biases don't make for functional society, it only breeds dysfunction and opens avenues for abuse and corruption.