>In the future there will be no Koreans, Chinese, or ThaiWhere will we get our music, cheap goods, and prostitutes in 2100?
>>224502370Even if the TFR is 0.5, there are still people being born, dumbass. Stop being hyperbolic about the population decrease in some densely populated areas as if they’re going extinct.
>>224502370>0.26
>>224502436>In 2100 at current birth rates China will have a population of 376 with a median age of 68 and only 17 million women of reproductive age>The working age to dependent ratio will be 1 to 1.3Complete fucking extinction. But ignore the problem, that is clearly the best solution
>>224502436Vietnam has a birthrate of 2.0 to China's 0.87 (this assumes we believe CCP stats when in reality it is estimated to be 0.6). Vietnam will reclaim their lost land. You a Chinese living in Vietnam will be the slave to Viet bulls.
>>224502370Will Heilongjiang be first place in the world with negative one?
>>224502567Once the births go negative, children will be forced back into their moms' vaginas.
>>224502603Kojima, please stop for once
