Native people of the Americas, what do you know about them? You're free to debate whether they ever are native
Bump This is a really good Thread
>>224537236They just come across as a retarded, boring version of Mongols.
>>224540078Why boring?Mm
>>224537236They were to our boomers what Palestinians are to zoomers
>>224540161Kek that made me laugh. They gave while polel some serious beating though Mm
>>224537236Giving them their own land and welfare kind of fucked them for generations, all they do is mill around smoke meth and get drunk. The only successful ones are the ones that have casinos. I hope they get some kind of second wind and re-establish their culture in this day and age. I respect the ones who admit that their ancestors were violent tribal murderous warriors that slaughtered their enemies conan style instead of trying to make lame excuses about being peace loving and all that crap. Also their cops are based as hell when it comes to protesters.
>>224540159Maybe not boring, just not interesting compared to Mongols. If I want to read about pastoralist travelling herders, that's what Mongols are, except they have a cool history with an Empire spanning the entire relevant ancient world. It helps that there is much more of an account of Mongols, since the Chinese, Persians and Europeans wrote of them. Most of Native American history is lost because they didn't write anything, and the sorts of people who did write about them didn't turn up until the 1400s.But I'd be willing to change my opinion. I'm into historical fiction if there are any good books about them.
>>224540318Forget about them today, you can't even count this joke of an existence, but not like anyone else, you can't even say regular westers have the greatest lifestyle. I'm talking about the real Indian days, don't give me that doom and gloom. I'm trying to escape reality which is just that >>224540333I get what you mean, it's definitely more basic. The rapes and creative torture is quite spicy to read about though. And the way they have to adapt to living such rough lives with unorthodox and wild habitsMm
>>224537236Do latinos count as native?
>>224540553Don't be dumb
>>224540564What? Most of them are majority native or at least half, except in Brazil and Argentina. Bolivians, Guatemalans and Peruvians are nearly full blooded. Mexicans and Chileans are close.
>>224540078>>224540333>native american = north american plain indiansyou're so dumb
>>224540666Well you wouldn't call a Bolivian or Guaramalan a Latina mate. Mexicans and the lot, no way they're proper mongrels. In what world can you call the Mayans?You might as well call Brazilians Zulus if that's your way of thinking
>>224540747What?
>>224540747OP is very clearly talking about specifically North American plains Indians in this thread you retard, why don't you complain to him?
>>224540790Most Guatemalans are literally Mayans mate, if not in culture at least in blood. And yes they all are Latin American, because they live in Latin America>>224540825>>224540853>OP is very clearly talking about specifically North American plains IndiansIs he? Let's look at the OP together:>>224537236>Native people of the Americasright there
>>224540993What's what I'm frikin saying, you fool! Why are you call long them Latin Americans? They're nearly full bloody Mayan.>because they live in Latin AmericaAnd now you confuse it even more. If every organism that lives there in latin American then why did you make the differentiation? Obvious a Latina is not a plains Indian or Aztec in my eyes as well al nearly everyone else in the planet. Selma hayak is a Latina, and far from an aztek or mayan. Why are you being difficult?
Anyway I'm going to bed now, you're a very annoying Frenchman
>>224540318>I respect the ones who admit that their ancestors were violent tribal murderous warriors that slaughtered their enemies conan styleWhy is that an issue anyway? They were living in the Stone Age until like the 1900s. Of course they were violent tribals.Do people think Stone Age Europeans went around wearing top hats and going "You, Sir, are no gentleman", or what?
