would you racemix in your country?
I think I would race mix with poles.
>>225028492I cant imagine birthing niglets and living with them. They still have half of yoyr genes but they dont look like you and are more genetically different to you than a random european stranger
>>225028492Both the mom AND the dad looks bogged wtf
it is my birthright to mix
>>225028877>try to draw hot jeeta>end up with palette swapped european womanwhy does this happen
>>225028637>are more genetically different to you than a random european strangerIF that were true(and I'm not sure it is), couldn't the same thing be said about an Italian their half-Swedish children, and any other random Italians?
>>225028982i will make 100s of these
>>225028492I would breed everyone in that video, except the manThe older daughter is muy deliciosa
>>225029026
>>225028492You SHOULD mix as a way to grant your child access to as many slurs and opportunities as possible
>>225028999>IF that were true(and I'm not sure it isIt's not. Chuds don't know what genes are. They have XIX century ideas of genetics
>>225029072i dont even care for white girls anymoremixing is a good thing unirionically. lets bring some diversity and dynamics to the gene pool.
>>225029052this
>>225029107Regular average post from that flag
>>225028492I’m already mixed, so any girl I get with would be considered racemixing
>>225029254whiteness is just a boring old construct written by 19th century blokeslets go beyond it
>>225028999>>225029077I'm not sure, maybe it would be true for southern Europeans but a Finn might be more different.But you have to remember that the genetic difference between Europeans and subsaharan Africans is a lot bigger than to any other race.Even East Asians are closer to Europeans.
>>225028999Yes, a half black half Swede is more genetically distant to a Swede than an Italian. The Brasimian who responded to you is just repeating lefty nonsense. Brazil is the last place you want to get information on genetics from.
>>225028637>They still have half of yoyr genes but they dont look like youIs skin color all that you can see? All three girls have their mom's face, and lol if you think mom is a natural blonde.
>>225028492Yes
>>225028999>I'm not sure it isnigger fucking look at them. how fucking brain addled do you have to be to not realize something this obvious. visual similarity is an excellent proxy for genetic closeness because it immediately tells you how a large number of genes are being expressed at a glance.
>>225029763Genotype is not the same as phenotype.
>>225029077no, it is perfectly in line with modern genetics and it's so obvious nobody evem thinks to mention it.you can determine relation distance by snp sequence length statistics so a DNA test will tell you that she's the mother of those children (only a single recombination event distant) but the overall genome will still be far more distant than some random shitalian whose most recent common ancestor to hers was 50 generations agorelation distance != genetic similarity
>>225029829see >>225029848 you fucking mouth breatherthe variance in expression quickly collapses as you add more and more genes to your test and just looking at a person is a test that visually immediately samples thousands of sites
>>225029399Yes but it's meaningless. Your kids are very close genetically to you, much more than a random neighbour.>>225029763XIX century "genetics".May as well go back to phrenology.
>>225029879>>225029848You're just making shit up.Leave /pol/ and learn how genes work.
>>225029763BOO a mixed race girl
>>225029879Ok, but the point that I was making is that the Italian's point, if it were true, would also apply to all interethnic reproduction, not just interracial, for example the Italian anon's theory implies that the children you have with a White French woman would be less related to you than any other random ethnic Latvian.
>>225029926you don't understand what you're talking about. close relatives have longer max length sequences of alleles that are exactly the same. but if the overall count of genes that have the same allele is lower then the genomes will physically express in less similar ways.genetic distance counts the number of genes that are the same period. kinship distance counts how many recombination events happened between two genomes by looking at the longest present uncut sections. if you mix with someone from a very distant population the overall mixed genome will not be similar to either of the parents.
>>225029949it would take you 20 seconds on google to see that I am correct, monkey. see >>225029994
>>225030012>>225029994I can't breed: the post
>>225029964it applies to any two populations so long as they are distant enough. who said it didn't? the question is what's the exact threshold and that's difficult to answer without testing empirically.
>>225030042>no counterargumentso you googled, saw I was right, and now have nothing to fall back on kek learn your place monkey
>>225030103t.
>>225030081>>225029964basically to predict it you need to know the distribution of alleles within each parent population and then try to predict where a kid would land. as a general rule of thumb if the kid will look visibly, identifiably distinct from either of the parents then it's probably true.so latvian x lithuanian - most likely falsebut latvian x french - most likely true
>>225030135>trust the science, chud>nooo not like that you weren't actually supposed to learn the science!
>>225028492This must be The UK. That blonde woman must be Polish.
Why does having children as genetically close to you as possible matter? You people worry about the dumbest shit possible I swear.
>>225028492Why do coalburners all have the same look?
>>225029763>genetic closenessWhy does that matter at all?
>>225030323Fit and highly attractive?
>>225028492just be niggabvll..being yelow is the worst thing that could happen to indivisual
>>225030276evolutionarily speaking it is optimal to reproduce with individuals who are as similar as possible without running into inbreeding depression (so ~ 6 degrees removed). your alleles probably won't survive as a one off in a pool of different alleles because you have literally precisely zero relation to most of your ancestors and descendants but they will survive if a whole population carries them and kids get them from either parent regardless of how the coinflip works out.
>>225030433physical, physiological similarityinstinctive in group preference (emotional)ingroup preference (biological, genetic)if you fuck a nigger and make babies you ultimately end up having to live in a house full of niggers. not the most desirable experience.
>>225030508nigga you think there is some scoreboard afterlive where the djenghis khan maxxers gain rizz based on the genetic similarity of their spawn?
>>225030201>I WANT TO BREED
>>225030276anon shut up and take your shaming for not wanting to be a cousin fucker
>>225030508>>225030543>physical, physiological similarity>instinctive in group preference (emotional)>ingroup preference (biological, genetic)Agree with these points if its a country with vast majority of population one race. Although more of your genes carrying over to your offsprings don't mean shit in grand scheme of things.
>>225030543>>225030508>kids get them from either parent regardless of how the coinflip works out.But are they really YOUR genes that were passed on to those descendants if YOU weren't the source of those genes? If you think so, then someone with an identical twin who has no children, but their twin would have children(the first twin's neices and nephews), would be just as "reproductively successful" as the second twin who does have children. Whether you repoduce among your fellow Latvians, or you reproduce with members of other races, you have equal chances of passing on YOUR genes, genes that originate from your genotype.
