[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 5675787965.png (446 KB, 1062x1314)
446 KB PNG
What does /int/ think about this ?
>>
>>225435414
both would destroy themselves before each other
>>
>>225435414
I posted this on pol earlier
>>
>>225435414
Nigeria Egypt and South Africa all have military satellites, Egypt and Algeria have C-17 strategic airlifters
>>
I think it highlights that internet opinions arent nessacarily about who is the most right but who has the largest numbers
>>
>>225435414
immensely retarded, modern technology, even if few and far between in the case of africa, can completely obliterate 1939 military tech and render it obsolete
>>
>>225435414
BNWO will unironically happen in this scenario
>>
>>225435414
Retarded arabs in north africa spend 50 billions a year on military
Remove algeria morocco egypt and it would be fair
>>
File: eu navy 1939.png (103 KB, 747x997)
103 KB PNG
>>225435663
it's pretty europe favored i would say
even with nafricans they wouldnt be able to make a landing in europe
and their air superiority wouldnt last long since they dont produce their own planes
>>
>>225435991
>air superiority wouldnt last long
nothing in 1939 can shoot down a modern jet
>>
>>225435414
Where are they going to get food from
>>
>>225435414
Are we talking about all of Africa working together to achieve a goal? Because that seems kinda impossible
>>
let us and turkiye join in and wh*toids will crumble
>>
>>225435414
I'm pretty sure north africans will carry hard
>>
Europe, easy
>>
>>225436387
It's more likely than the Nazis, Brits, Soviets, etc. all deciding to work together.
>>
>>225435586
>>225436233
Blitzkrieg through North Africa might make it viable. It's the closest area too. On the ground level it wouldn't be that different. And once they hit the airports that's it for the airforce.
>>
>>225436233
Anti-aircraft straight from 1939 shot down the American stealth bomber in 1999
>>
>>225439344
Americans weren't fond of Soviets and yet they worked together.
Hitler hated slavs and yet Germany reached an agreement with the USSR to split the land.
The clash of interests ultimately lead to conflict, but cooperation preceded it.
>>
Egypt would collapse on its own
>>
Industry wins wars
What Ngubu or Mahmoud finna do after their 3 jets get shot down and the capabilities of making them can only be found in USA/Europe/China
>>
>>225439429
And 10+ million non-American troops fought in the European Theater so imagine sending millions of total war fanatics against modern phone addicts.
>>
>>225436233
What about War Thunder?
>>
>>225435414
Are counting north africa? If so, africa no-diffs. Without it? Europe wins with some struggles but ultimately succeeds. Please keep in mind, 1939 britain was helping the us develop the nuclear bomb, something africa has yet to achieve. And no, south africa doesn't count because the only people who ever made some were white people who destroyed them before the handover.
>>
>>225439558
I'm sure the 5 failed states that will literally collapse without grain shipments from Europe are really gonna turn the tides of the war bro
>>
>>225439620
>>225435519
>>
>>225439558
It's nonsense, there's no way Africa would win. They're boasting about Arab weapons that are imported from somewhere else, which they have no way to maintain without a third party, while they barely have any arms industry of their own. When you look at Europe, it was at times a hyper-militarized society whose economy was largely self-sustaining and devoted to the military. Africa's gonna get wrecked.
>>
>>225439655
All made by wypipo, all finna become lost technology the moment they get blown up
>>
I’ll it takes someone to bribe some pilots to defect and reverse engineer modern jets
>>
>>225439684
>>225439620
I think the biggest question is if Egypt can lock in and use their air superiority in an intelligent way. Modern militaries aren't designed for mass scale combat so it's very likely they would run out of ammo before the european states run out of men and machines. But if this is set in world where all other modern countries have magically disappeared, there is absolutely nothing stopping egypt from producing nuclear weapons in a very short time frame, as the technology is very very easy to design as long as you have enough raw uranium. It's essentially a race to the bomb that europe can't win.
>>
>>225439708
Sorry I thought we were talking about stuff at the moment not some meta bullshit
>>
>>225439799
Nothing meta about the fact that 1939 Europe has domestic industry capable of running a war machine whilst Africa is a gaggle of failed states with foreign technology they can't produce nor fix, utterly dependent on European agriculture
>>
>>225439799
Shut up, Jeet. No one takes your retarded opinions seriously. You should go back to your jeet internet and stop polluting 4chan with your compatriots.
>>
>>225439983
Bodied that freak
>>
File: 52-К.jpg (279 KB, 1280x908)
279 KB JPG
>>225439432
1961 weapon, very different from pic related which is what they would have had in 1939
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-125_Neva/Pechora
>>
>>225439429
>modern planes and antiship missiles rape your entire fleet before they can even land
gg
>>
File: toyota war.jpg (210 KB, 461x1261)
210 KB JPG
>>225439558
muh north africa
>>
>>225435519
germany will develop Die Glocke within years tho
>>
>>225440043
>UMMM actually it was 40 year old tech that shot down the latest space age technology that we have no inventory of!
Good one bro
>>
>>225439983
>>225439960
>>225440037
>>225440198
>Die glocke
>Rocket jets
>Amerkiabomber
>Maus
I seemed to have stumbled into a glaze Europe (Nazoids) thread, I guess you can obliterate modern gunships while your horse drawn logistics lines can keep up, assuming the Preßstoff horse harnesses doesn't fail that is
>>
>>225440079
Ships? Just roll up through east. It's1939 British Mandate of Palestine and Turkey is on the team too.
>>
>>225440334
Rebutted none of my points award
>>
>>225440334
Those are imported weapons, are you dumb? They do not have spare parts and stockpiles to sustain them for half a year, let alone a total war. While Europe has engineers and a supply-chain industry to replicate them, and top commanders who have been trained since birth to adapt, which African “education” does not have. My God, you should just go back to your jeet internet and stop larping.
>>
>>225440516
The premise was 1939 Europe vs modern day africa, any nation of africa

I'm going to digitally disembowel you, do you wish to edit any of your claims before I begin?
>>
>>225440243
huge difference it's not even a joke
>>
>>225440383
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_of_Death
>>
>>225440621
Do it then. Modern north african states are still not comparable to early 20th century europe one.
>>
>>225440676
What highway are you thinking of
>>
>>225440750
Haha. That nigga is retarded.
>>
>>225440683
The flaw in your logic is simple: the war would not last six weeks, let alone six months

Egyptian Armed Forces would know where 1939 Euroshit troops will be before even Euro commanders

Egypt has its own massive domestic arms industry (you can literally type this into Google, they make their own abrams)

Germany was fighting a war of attrition too, only they had to substitute everything because they were bumblocked from everything, even coffee, ever heard the phrase Nylon won the war, google it, point is today Egypt can make technology that BTFOd germans at a much more massive scale than USA

Egypt has professional military education and martial tradition as well, Nasser Higher Military Academy

1939 tactics will get you instantly roasted in today's wars
>>
>>225440963
My God, the more you’re puking shit, the more retarded it is. African armies have no way to cross the Mediterranean given Europe’s ships and U-boats, while they have almost none. If that’s all you’ve collected, then you should just kill yourself, honestly, this is embarrassing.
>>
>>225435414
A 1939 Europe already owns almost all of Africa.
>>
>>225440963
>Egyptian Armed Forces would know where 1939 Euroshit troops will be before even Euro commanders
I don't think the premise is fair if they can just open a history book and know where every factory is
I was thinking of the premise like if a rift in spacetime opens up and a world where Africa doesn't exist gets fused with a world where Europe doesn't exist
>>
File: 1791533155616103.png (684 KB, 894x894)
684 KB PNG
>>225435414
doesn't matter, Egypt will find a way to fuck it up for everyone
>>
>>225441457
That wouldn't make sense with resource dependence on second thought
>>
>>225440750
it's an example of how an armored column can simply get smoked by a mhch superior air force
not that you need an air.force, shit like ATGMs and modern tanks could achieve a similar result
people who think you can compare 1930s tech to 2020s tech are really missing some briancells, make it 70s europe vs 2020s africa and you have a more interesting premise
>>
>>225441072
Uh huh, and why would Africans give up homefront advantage stupid yellow nigger, Egypt has submarines too you yellow bastard, go back to rice farming dumb yellow bastard and grow up mentally, though I guess a people who have been Agent Oranged will be perma retarded
>>
>>225435414
Depends entirely on the objectives of the War.
>>
>>225435586
This, a lot of these scenarios like to pretend that Africa is just the sub-Saharan Africa and nothing else.
And even if we only assume sub-saharans then saffas, nigerians and kenyans would give quite the headache alone.
>>
>>225441457
Jesus Christ, I didn't know Macedonians were this retarded, Africans have satellites, if they can't use satellites they can use "domestically manufactured drones", if not that they can rely on ground radar, if not that then airborne awacs, if not that then plain old recon flights
>>
>>225441697
You are the one who said the war would not last for 6 months, and now you said Africans wouldn’t give up their advantages to initiate an offensive. So how could they end the war in that short amount of time? Get a load of this faggot, kek.
>>
>>225441823
You can still hide things though
Cracking open a history book and knowing exactly where the Hitler bunker is would be too OP
Could be fair if Europeans know that nafrica can just crack open the history books
Maybe have like a 6 month period of peace or something
>>
>>225441800
Even in terms of civilian industry, Nigeria and Egypt have massive chemicals sector that produce value added end user stuff which can be put to dual use
>>
>>225441890
You're uneducated right? Two completely different things retarded yellow nigger, even the most unga nations don't chimp out like Nazoids and Soviets, nobody wants to deplete their stockpiles
>>
>>225441994
So how do they win the war, you retard jeet? You listed the imported weapons of African countries, but they do nothing with those tiny stockpiles. Meanwhile, Europeans are mass-producing and updating their tech, and sub-Saharan Africans have been starving since AIDS ended. There really is no way for Africans to win this, just admit it.
>>
>>225441916
>Actually it's like this now
I literally began my argument with the assumption it's a hot war, in the moment, like right now, 1939 europe vs 2026 Africa, it was you and that vietcunt american cocksleeve who stretched it to supply chains and Westoids this and that
>>225442099
>How do they win the war?
By defeating the enemy you slimy amphibian yellow faggot
>>
>>225442190
Defeating the enemy without boots on the ground? Kek, you indeed should just kill yourself
>>
>>225435414
Basically Europe vs Egypt+South Africa.
Yeah, big mystery who would win this.
>>
>>225435414
Anyone who says Europe has gone down the deep end of the chudpill and is permanently lost to political retardation.
Even the only slightly understandable but still ineffective excuse of supply chains and logistics does not change the outcome.
>>
>>225435414
africa could win by shock and awe, deploy everything you have, nuke everyone you can before your supplies dwindle.
if the war became prolonged, they would lose eventually.
>>
>>225442190
I'm just saying it depends on the premise innit

If the premise is 1939 Europe teleported to today and nafris know what beer hall Hitler is in, they can just fire some rockets straight at him and every other leader

But that's not fun, it doesn't actually explore the hypothetical
>>
>>225442308
Yeah, if you defeat the enemy you win, shame you've never won a war so obviously you wouldn't understand
>>225442311
>Here comes another
>>
>>225435414
Assuming a world with only 1939 Europe and 2026 Africa in it, Europe would clean the floor with them. Besides maybe South Africa and Algeria not a single African nation would have the economic capacity to pay for an intercontinental war.
>>
>>225442360
Nafris can just shoot any amphibious assault from their coasts, and plunge the combined European fleet to the bottom, like euros are, they don't have to do anything but produce ~40 year old anti ship missiles and even better drones for the next few years
>>
>>225442455
That's just a stalemate, winning should be military occupation or something
>>
>>225442505
No, our modern industrial capacity, even in shitty nations, the efficiency, and recycling, are miles ahead of anything 1939 had, they can't just keep building ships and tanks, but we can, because we can repurpose and recycle with much less waste than back

Ultimately, this whole scenario is retarded beyond a simple 1v1 comparison, and pretty ancient considering I first saw this on Quora eons ago
>>
>>225442664
Sure thing bro, nice job completly missing my point btw
>>
>>225435414
Literally zero chances for Africa, they don't have competent trained infantry and officers.
That was the strongest Europe of the all time, tens of millions soldiers.
Few modern weapons will change nothing.
>>
>>225442771
Okay, sea->empty->coastal defences->gone->friendly air cover->gone->Huzzah storm the French Riviera->Hurrah it's Grenada with BBC hanging out
>>
>>225439731
Classic jew, kek
>>
>>225435614
Inshallah
>>
>>225435414
Nigeria alone has bigger population than half the Europe map... One intercontinental ballistic rocket would be enough to nail down Europe's morals to the ground harder than Nagasaki ever did to Japan...
Stuck in Ethiopia type of "we kinda retreated but didn't really lose" awkward lowkey humiliated situation is the absolute best case outcome for the whities close to a miracle, y'all just insanely delusional



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.