Objectively speaking and without chud/puritan/karen/whatever appeals to emotion on the matter, the overwhelming positive results/interactions/experiences i had with women have been me jacking off to pornstars/instagram models/OF girls. Like if you were to ask me "which women do you think you owe something good" it wouldnt be my mother or grandmother or teachers or whatever, it would scantily dressed/naked woman with a pornstar/OF phenotype. In fact they would take priority in that area over most, man or woman.
good morning sir
>>225468680>without appeals to emotion
i also like touching my penis
>>225467695OF foids are obsolete now because I have AI and I can gen whatever I want whenever I want
>>225469397I have seen the ai attempts, much as the scenarios are hentai tier, the quality is horrible.
>>225469512The AI is getting better, and you can get whatever artstyle you wantbeats being a paypig for some whore
>>225469538no its not really, sure i watched a breast expansion ai thing, yea ok neat then i went to an actual vid to fap. If thats your thing you do you, the ai quality is not good enough for me. Id rather watch porn or something than ai.
>>225469605I only jerk off to images. I don't care much for video. Don't most OF whores post images only anyway?
>>225469655sure, anyways. Objectively speaking that instathot showing off her fine ass has done more for me than most. Pearl clutchers trying to ban her can jump off a ditch.
>>225469795i have ascended beyond 3d thots
>>225469816k
Prostitution doesn't interest me, paying for any form of sex doesn't.The only value I've ever seen from women, beyond simple labor is intimacy, and none have ever given either without an ulterior motive and it's never been "love" so the whole practice feels redundant to me.Women are transactional to their core.>b-but moms aren't!!!!Mine was, both my grandmas were, most of the people I've known's moms were.I get there's a mythos about the nurturing female and I won't say it's baseless but facts have been greatly, greatly exaggerated.
>>225467695Well, pornstars are for mastubation ok, but I have to thank my mother for the culture, the education, the love of said culture, history, literature, music, nature, she encouraged me a lot to read, learn, listen. My grandmothers too, in a different way.
>>225467695Women age horribly and behave worse. Bring on the bots.
>>225467695>if you were to ask me "which women do you think you owe something good"What a weird question >it would scantily dressed/naked woman with a pornstar/OF phenotypeWhat a weird answer
>>225467695Funnily enough, I've come to notice that sexually promiscuous women are generally much more compatible with autists than those with low body counts.
>>225472986Whats so weird about it? >>225473016Im not some asmongold rat looking motherfucker or glasses wearing chud or some skinnyfat if thats what you are implying.
>>225471654Nope. All mine has ever done is agitate me or sabotage me. In any case what Im trying to say is that chudcels like this one >>225471654 using pornstars/instathots/OF girls etc to pearl clutch their woman hate campaign feels weird to me, since to me they are overwhelmingly the ones that had a positive, Ive done woman hating myself but only because I was emotionaly charged being stuck with my mother/grandmother all the time, not because women showed their ass and tits and filmed themselves taking dick or whatever.Grandma was a chuddete puritan control freak btw and I hate her. Why would I blame women for not being like her?
>>225474883>that had a positive result on me
>>225474804>Whats so weird about it?It's just so retarded it's beyond bizarre.Your point:>a whore wants money and attention in the most lazy way possible>does porn / onlyfans, probably to fuel her drug addiction >her only incentive is $ and ego boost from attention if she gets any (most don't)>her content, like porn, is only available to you for free thanks to countless hours of work that men did immeasurable work to research, set up and maintain electricity, computers, the internet, even the platforms where you can see porn for free>you use all those services taking them for granted>and somehow you feel that you "owe something nice" to the junkie whore that was present in a video getting dicked for cash for the next line of cokeSimps gonna simp I guess
>>225474889Yea I knew that you would from "golly gee thats so weird" to absolutely seething.I also knew that your beef would be that the woman is not a serf with "a real job" like you are. Always the same pattern. You are not gonna take credit for internet or whatever btw, get back in the warehouse where poles belong.
>"feel you owe something good">to a literal whore that made a career choice of getting fucked up the ass on camera for a few bucksthe zoomers are getting even more braindead
>>225474913What I wrote is too nuanced for a born and bred serf like you. Just know that I do not find your serf genes necessary to exist, much less your serf genes opinion. Good for the girl if she managed to be dragged down to serfdom by the likes of you.
>>225474929to not* be dragged down
>>225474904You're too retarded to read properly.The transaction the whore took part in - does not include you, at all. The whore took a dick for $. She didn't do any charity. She didn't want for you to feel good, she doesn't know you exist. Her transaction was she swallows loads from a dick that just drilled her ass and she receives some drug money in return.And you "feel you owe something good" towards the whore. Which is unbelievable levels of simp and retard.Funnily enough you do not feel this towards the men that produced the video, released the video for free and maintain the servers from which you can stream or download it - all of what allowed you to see it - you just want to rationalize being a pathetic simp towards literal whores.Scary, funny and sad at the same time.
>>225474964We're reaching levels of simp that shouldn't even be possible
>>225474964Im just not engaging in your whataboutism is all. All you have is whataboutism btw? Thanks for confirming my thoughts in such a manner.You can keep seething about it btw. It wont change anything.
>>225474973Did I ruin your pearl clutching momentum with my "simping"? All you got is appeal to emotion. Objectively speaking the woman showing her titties on camera is infinitely more valuable to me than your stupid ass with your "real job". Seethe about it all you want right next to the other pole.
I come to France to meet my gf, I cook pasta for her, we have passionate love, we go sleep together. Life is good.
>>225475106Are you gonna start seething too like the "golly gee thats so weird" pole if I tell you "ok good for you but it has nothing to do with what Im talking about"?
bad bot
>>225475133I'll pray for you to find good women, especially if you are white.
>>225475172kek you are so pathetic>>225475192Yea I knew it that you will start seething cause your underhanded posting style didnt work kek
>>225475213I'm not seething, if the women you met were not good experiences (because positive interactions were with the OF ones), than I pray that you may find such good women.
You're not really experincing things with them, though? You're interacting with your dick. The pictures and videos are just a medium to excite yourself. You could probably pick up a good smut book and get the same experience, if you're not suffering from aphantasia.
>>225475250Yea of course you are not. Thats why you flipped your script 180 degrees from one post to the next. All you try to do now is damage control your pearl clutching narrative by separating "good" from "OF ones". Its funny you put effort into it as if your life depends on my opinion, I assure you the reverse is not true.
>>225475261So the only thing you can say against my thoughts is whataboutism and some poor bait about aphantasia or something? Well thanks for reaffirming them.
>>225467695You never made a question. What are we supposed to argue without appealing to emotion do you mean?
>>225475320Can you actually reply without jumping to instant seething? I wasn't judging your masturbation habits.
>>225475326Making a question is not a necessity. If it is to you feel free to not engage.>What are we supposed to argue without appealing to emotion do you mean?check the other anons, all they got pearl clutching or "simp" or other underhanded methods similar to appeal to emotion.
>>225475355I mean I already had one anon do the whataboutism thing, try some new underhanded method for a change.
>>225475382There's no whataboutism in my post. I didn't deflect a hard-to-criticize point, because there's nothing to really criticize about>I like jerking it to Instagram and Onlyfans girlsI only pointed out that you're not interacting with the girls themselves if all you do is jerk off to pictures and videos of them.C'est n'est pas un pipe and all that.
>>225475444Yes you did whataboutism. Just like the pole started saying "whatabout the computers" you started saying "whatabout the books". >I only pointed out that you're not interacting with the girls themselves if all you do is jerk off to pictures and videos of them.And why should I pearl clutch against them for that? If anything I should have positive thoughts about them to match the positive experience I had. There is no reason for me to have negative thoughts about them except by being swept by some appeal to emotion pearl clutching, the fact that I dont do that makes lots of anons seethe as you can see.
Well whatever what I was getting at is basically that I dont buy this pearl clutching narrative. If you start some similar kind of narrative against art girls or something ill be doing the same kind of post. Its all just trying to build up a frenzy appeal to emotion there is no reason for me to have negative thoughts about the girls I jack off to on screen than anymore than an art girl whose art I enjoy or some other similar scenario you can think about. Ridiculous appeal to emotion pearl clutching. Good to both girls that avoided the "default" serf path that serf genes want for everyone or else theyll cry bloody murder.
