Internationally speaking why did pretty much every successful civilization put restraints on female freedom?
realistically they should have gone a step further and put restraints on everybody
>>225472364what a mystery uh?
>>225472364Because it was based on land ownership.But it's incorrect to say that it restrained women's freedom
>>225472745lmfao
>>225472364You don't actually believe in this, because you choose to live in a place with equal rights instead of moving to Afghanistan. You're the chud version of an iphone socialist. Revealed preferences trump stated preferences.
>>225472745We'll never know.
>>225472364
>>225472364That's why the nazis got BTFO by the feminist allies?
>>225472816>gender rights are the ONLY difference between Poland and AfghanistanDisingenuous foid-brained freak lmao
>>225473411He's right thoEvery single one of these "patriarchal" societies is a hardcore shithole
>>225473505Have to be to simply just automatically kill women for wanting rights So every "decent" place gave them rights and they immediately became the niggers turning those places into shitholesIt isn't tough to explain
>>225473411Yeah, I wonder what else is different. Maybe it's that Afghanistan is a complete shithole because retards who oppose women's rights are fundamentally incapable of building functioning societies? Get real, there are precisely zero non-shitholes in which women have no rights. Put up or shut up.
>>225473606>Yeah, I wonder what else is different.Oh I dunno, maybe the fact that they're 85 IQ brownoids and that there are about 50 other unrelated things wrong with Pisslam?>Get real, there are precisely zero non-shitholes in which women have no rightsSuccessful western countries were built on patriarchy. And now that the patriarchy has been demolished, it mysteriously coincides with the gradual decline of western societies. It's really not that complicated, foid-brain.
>>225472816
