Plebbit is currently malding over this
The entirety of 1939 Europe? Pretty sure it wouldn't be close. Technology only goes so far.
Lack of humans in your app so you advertise here Elon?
>>225508380how about 45 europe, millions of veterans and wunderwaffe?
>>225508380Depends. Can they import shit from the rest of the world? Africa has basically no industrial capacity right now.
>>2255083801939 Europe would win because 2026 Africa would eventually run out of weapons.
>>225508380>>2255084561939 Europe was mobilizing millions of men and producing it's own weapons2026 Africa buys all it's weapons from outside and fields armies in hundreds of thousandsWehrmacht or Red Army alone could take entirety of 2026 Africa because they can tank losses in the millions of lives and tens of thousands in military hardwareEvery jet and tank africans lose is not replaceable because it came from outside of africa
>>225508739counter tho, ww2 europe was heavily reliant on resources from outside europe
>>225508776synthetic rubber in 1935 thoughever
>>225508456Africa has none of those things desu. When's the last time you've seen an African fly a fighter jet?
>>225508380MENA and south africa would be carrying hard africa, but overall i think the nignogs win due of technology alone AND THE NUMBERS, fuckers can just zergrush europe with AK's imagine seeing a swarm of ngubu's led by abdul's and boers, shit is terrifying.
>>225508831We sold kenya some air defence systems
>>225508380The Kenyan Army proved incapable of defeating gangs in Haiti
>>225509111haitians did pry their Independence out france, spain and englands hands. you need more than some soft Kenyan niggas to handle them
>>225508380Even modern soy and gay europe can evaporate n-word continent, let alone those 1939 electricians
>>225509007did you sell them the tech to make spare parts and ammo for it as well?>>225508982>zergrush europe with AK'sretarded, they couldn't even cross the sea>but nafri naviescould be sunk by HMS Warspite alone>but algerian jetswould run out of missiles before Royal Navy runs out of ships
>>225508380Africa would implode in a few months without external aid. Egyptians would be cannibalizing each other in no time
>>225508456Truthoshima
>>225508380Are they not allowed to post swastikas on Musk's website? Why is Germany represented by a big white sphere?
>>225509293MENA alone has enough ASHM's to sink the majority of yuropoors navy's, if not wipe out everyone in the meds
>>225508817fuel too i meantand metals
>>225508831most of africa has fighter jets, even cold war era ones are far better than ww2 propsnot to mention north african countries like egypt morocco and algeria which are ultra militarized
It's the old Hadian problem. How the fuck do you occupy Africa? We could conscript our entire male population and leave eight tenths of it in open rebellion.
>>225508380Any 1 of those countries could conquer the entirely of Africa and it wouldn't even be close
>>225509401no they don't, look up the sizes of those navies>>225509413all can be found in europe and russia, why it was scarce in WW2 was because all euros were busy building up out of proportion to kill each other and wouldn't trade>>225509452so what? how long can they keep those hundreds flying by themselves? a year? two? without spare parts they are gone, cannibalizing the fleet just to keep some flyingmeanwhile luftwaffe has built another thousand>all shot downso what, here's another two thousand comingeveryone seems to not realize the scale at which europe was operating back then
>>225509557fair, i forgot russia has like every resource in the worldonly win for africa is an early shock with jets forcing a surrender
>>225508380North Africa and South Africa have some pretty capable military forces, it wouldn’t be close
>>225508380there are 1.5billion people living in africa today. they all have access to at the very minimum ak47s, machetes, and rocket propelled grenades. many african nations have tanks and fighter aircraft. Some have access to sophisticated command and control, including GPS, target painting, communications jamming, and modern encryption which would be unbreakable to 1939. Some probably have secret germ labs. It's nice that some of you think a few hundred million white people with tanks and unguided bombs would stand a chance, but maybe play a game of civilization one day. europe wouldn't survive the inital push. and when they were worn down, africa would still have billions more soldiers. stop being retarded
>>225509992that would be the case if the human capital was comparable but it isn't in the slightest. African countries can't even operate in peacetime let alone during war
>>225509888yeah but most of them dont produce their advanced tech themselves, which is the argument made here is that europe is self sufficient
>>225509992All the things you mention are provided to them by either chinks, ruskies or NATO. On top of that their entire civilian infrastructure and (practically non-existent) industry would collapse before eurocunts could even sail over there, so by the time they disembarked it'd already be full on civil war and they would just need to wait and kill the survivors.You have to understand there are practically no African countries that are even countries or have any kind of unifying culture. There are mostly just tribes and tribal confederations pushed together by colonialism, and on top of that a fucking clusterfuck of different cultures, religions (naturalist, Christian, Islam).
>>225508380North Africa would be going like this. Everyone else is dead weight
>>225510786>Cuts off food exportsHeh, nothing personal kid
>>225508380>arguing about imaginary scenarios / alternate history
The only way Europeans might avoid extinction would be chemical weapons
>>225508380Can modern day africa keep buying unlimited drones from modern day China in this scenario? If is I don't see how this is a debate
algeria has its own satellites, that alone makes it too easy for north africa, north africa alone would win
it's just a matter of time until they run out of guns and it's joevernot to mention food, clean water, healthcare, etcAfrica can't function without the support of the entirety of the rest of the world as they are, let alone being able to fight in a war against a militarized Europe of 1939>>225508456>>225508712these
>>225511233North africa would starve and their economies collapse if cut off from europe
>>225511002This. It's so fucking retarded
Honestly I think Egypt itself could solo 1939 Europe. And it would not be very close either. The technology from 87 years ago is a joke compared to the shit countries have today.All of Africa? Africa doesnt just win, they could annex the whole continent
>>225511743>The technology from 87 years ago is a joke compared to the shit countries have todayMost countries still struggle to many nuclear weapons. Something Europe was close to achieving around WWII.
People still think everything is tech and dbz power levels and fail to see that Europeans are elite strategists that can see things at a high level that other races cannotthey have punched above their weight in warfare for a very long time in whatever shifting context
>>225508380Is Africa big in the drone game? Since they are cheap they would easily win without much of an effort. Population advantage and children with ak47s would also make them more formidable.
>>225512115he is german cuck slut, he has humiliation fantasy, ignore him
>>225512174Interesting how the yellow races (Chinese, Vietnamese) could fix the communist system to work while the elite European Russian strategists failed and watched their empire fall apart in the cuck chair, while losing to the simple brained Afghan race
>>225512240Go back to cleaning toilets, thats all you are good for.
>>225512313Socioeconomics are another thing. East Asians are a very productive and conformist group of people so collectivism makes more sense for them. Whites just try to manipulate and extract from each other in that system. With that said it was also Russians/Slavs.
>>225512115>Most countries still struggle to many nuclear weapons. Something Europe was close to achieving around WWII.yeah due to sanctions and outright getting bombed/assassinated/overthrown if you tried (I heard something like this is going on right now), not so much because the tech is some alien shitif pakistan can have it then it it's not that difficult technologically
>>225512240He's correct, what are you on
>>225509557I doubt naval anti-air in '39 could prevent modern jets from chucking dumb bombs at them. Bomb sighting has made insane leaps since then.>>225512115South Africa made the bomb in the 80s, if they wanted to they would. Even North Korea has made nukes.
>>225512365>Pakistani metallurgist Abdul Qadeer Khan, commonly known as A. Q. Khan, had worked in the Netherlands in an industrial environment connected to the European uranium-enrichment consortium URENCO.>He passed sensitive centrifuge technology information and supplier contacts to Pakistan.Stolen from Europe.
>>225508380Take out North Africa and 1939 Europe wins easily
>>225512506>South Africa made the bomb in the 80sYou know it was still controlled by White people then, right?
>>225512539do you not realize that almost every country with a nuclear weapon did the same? including israel, USSR, china, etc.
>>225512738>all these thirdies did it too!!
>>225512738Every one except Western Europe and America. Gee, I wonder why. Almost like they're superior or something.
>>225508380Better organized group will win always
We haven't actually seen the 3rd world attempt to use nukes yet. It remains to be seen just how "easy" it is lmao.
>>225512898Only America and France fully independently developed their programs on their own.Britain had it shared by the Americans, the rest got it through espionage or outside help.
>>225513096uhm sweaty, sweden had an independent program aswell
>>225513143sweden is cool, I'm sure you could have made the bomb if you wanted
>>225508380Infantry alone would be a huge difference, people were still using bolt action and non magazine fed semiauto rifles in ww2Imagine a modern jet vs ww2 monoplanesPretty sure i remember reading about Egypt buying some warships and frigates from us
>>225513096But do you think Britain COULDN'T have arrived at it independently? We know they could. Just like we know Pakistan could NOT have without stealing from Europe.We all know this. Even you.
>>225512359It would seem the yellow Asians are better at ruthless individualistic capitalism than the white European people who aren't from historical trading hubs like London, Amsterdam or Venice. After all, there are many Japanese brands, and an increasing number of Korean and Chinese ones, but to this day no Russian brand is known to mankind.
>>225509888>>225509992The retards who think waris just about fighting battles have arrived
>>225508739Africa today could easily set up supply chains for producing Cold War tier tanks. The Wehrmacht only had 10.5 million men at their peak by the way. Egypt alone could scraggle up enough men to beat that by the double.
>>225514720Sure like we've seen Saudi Arabia or other countries be able to mobilize against jihadists
>>225508380I doubt 1939 Europe could occupy today's Africa whose population was multiplied by like 10 since then, and while they have little to no military industry they still have a lot of tanks and shiet laying aroundThere's no way Africa manages to organise a landing on European soil however
>but Europeans would the epic master strategists Zulus were the epic "master strategists", but you couldn't win with just spears and captured rifles, not when the enemy has way more rifles that they themselves produce, and machine guns, cannons and railroads, and every thing else modern at that time. At some point you can't bullshit your way out of reality.
>>225509457You give one of the smaller bullied ethnic groups control of their neighbours in exchange for their loyalty
>>225514782WWII era Europe has absolutely nothing similar to how Jihadists wage warfare. The terrorism of today is itself a modern invention.Some retards like ISIS could completely destabilise countries in 1939 Europe (but not control them proper).
>>225514938No, it's just because no one gives a shit who's in charge and all the conscripts are on drugs
>>225508380Depends if it includes norf Africa of if it's just subsaharian Africa, and also if the white south Africans fight against Europe too.
And lethargic drugs at that, not Pervitin
>>225514972That describes a certain European army in WWII too.
>>225508380It's not as obvious as it seems, Africa has the technology but it's also very reliant on import, Europe has manpower and better logistics. Europe would try their hardest to steal tech and reverse engineer it, and even if that wasn't possible they could ramp up to early Cold War tier weapons pretty fast. But I don't see Europe achieving any decisive victory because of the sheer size of the continent, at the same time whether Africa would be able to effectively mobilize in Europe is another question.
>>225514854Practically all of the senior officers of 1939 Europe would be WW1 veterans. They'd have tons of experience with rapidly changing technology and tactics.
>>225508380WW1 had Europeans use plenty of chemical weapons that were banned in WW2 because they were too overpowered
>>225508380Some of the European posters in this thread clearly failed their history classes because they underestimate chemical warfare in WW1 and WW1 Europe was extremely enthusiastic about using chemical weapons everywhere on the battlefield. 2026 Africa would be very ill equipped to deal with chemical warfare because they can not afford to give gas masks to every African soldier.
>>225508380you have to go back
Incompetence.Literally the only competent people in the whole of 2026 Africa are SA Boers and they would defect.Incompetence leads to ruin, no matter the on paper advantages.
>>2255083802026 Africa would just starve. Old map, their current food import situation is even worse.
>>225508380its true though
>>225508380Europe would MOP the floor with Africa and even countries like today's China in 1939, are you fucking kidding me? How is this even a question, just the number of ordnance they had could turn the Himalayas into dust, the tech gap is not as dramatic as people believe either, most of Africa is running with weapons from the 1960's, also, even if they last gen stuff people overstate how much of a difference it would make or how overpowered or invulnerable that would make them.
>>225508380i'm with afrika
>>225521789>Europe would MOP the floor with Africa and even countries like today's China in 1939,impressive levels of delusion euros really thunk they're hyperborean magical creatures kek
>>225508380An actual war scenario where both sides care about their industry and casualties and whatnot would be a long stalemate followed by a gradual advance by africa (mostly egypt) as they pull their advanced technology and industry together.In a forced quick 1v1 massive battle situation where no one cares about casualties Africa would also win, though again it'd really mostly just be europe vs egypt, and egypt would win because it's an actual modern military with actual internal supply chains and industry to supply it.Europe would still put up an overall impressive fight imo but thinking they'd win is just silly, especially in an actual war scenario. Even if europe somehow won the conventional war they'd get raped by modern guerillas.
>>225508456It's not even that.>continent with no running watervs>continent with logistics from 1940
My bet is that without pesky modern international interference nafris would take control of the SSA and send them all into the meatgrinder while they themselves set up some decent enough logistics, it's not like they can't develop, they just have no reason to because europe is right aboveSSA on it's own (other than outliers like rwanda) would be obliterated in days tho
>>225521946its just chattersomething right wing whites are very generous with
>>225508588Even if we give them that handicap they will still lose. Warfare isnt just about the equipment, the quality of the soldiers, doctrine, and military leadership matters also. The only possible way Africa wins is if they get continuous modern weapon aid and 1939 europe never gets to reverse engineer anything or make adaptations to their weapons systems or tactics.
Are white supremacists retarded as in they don't know Egypt alone has a fleet of over 200 fighter jets or are they retarded as in they think ww2 prop planes would win vs F-16s and Rafales?
>>225513096America had help from Britain and Canada.
