[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9254.jpg (50 KB, 639x410)
50 KB JPG
There is a growing desire among Americans for a Nordic-style democratic socialist society.
>>
>>225573941
Hmm, do we? I didn't know that
>>
>>225573970
all of your socialists think they can replicate the socioeconomic model of homogenous 5 million people countries in the US
>>
File: pepe-thumbs-up.gif (37 KB, 640x594)
37 KB GIF
>>225574642
actually, the chuds were half-right with their criticisms.
I realized we can't achieve this with all 50 states.
I mean, it actually is more than possible to implement with our economy compared to scandinavia's.
But at least 30/50 states are filled with stubborn idiots, and once it is achieved, they will be ungrateful. And once they benefit from it, they will once again take it for granted and shift the goalposts and vote for republicans again.
So, I have to say perhaps we should do the nordic way on a regional basis, starting with the PNW and New England. Californa might be able to figure it out, and I'm sure Colorado can manage to drag Cheyenne and much of New Mexico into enlightenment with it.
If the chuds actually agree to stop receiving our aid then this will go smoothly
>>
>>225574791
yes, the US should make use of their decentralized federal model to do interesting things on a regional level
there's mo reason why a place like massachusetts or washington should have a similar model to fucking alabama, but you need to gate it behind a form of residency or taxation, so you don't get leeches traveling there for benefits
>>
File: SOUCHIEN.jpg (6 KB, 320x180)
6 KB JPG
>>225574642
these socialists just want to see the emd of the white race, and they will
we have the same speciemen here, they're Jewish creations from the most part, lots come from your country kek
>>
>>225574966
>emd
we deserve it
>>
Not socialist tho
>>
>>225574966
you guys came to algeria and one of the first things you did was make the algerian jews french by law, you literally invaded a foreign country to take their jews by force, you couldn't have asked for it more
>>
>>225575027
>Crémieux decree
You should look onto who Adolphe Crémieux is. He was a Jew, and a Jewish supremacist. I don't know if you understand French, I could send you plenty about him.
We're the most raped goyim after the Palestinians, you guys were and still are great proxy. Rejoice, you semites won
>>
>>225573941
Americans are collectivist
>>
>>225575027
Btw the left is the reason we went so far into Algeria, the leftists wanted to colonize Algeria to "civilize" you guys, on the expense of the French as Jacque Marseille proved it. We made no profit (which is good).
Quoting Jules Ferry, "The superior race has a right, and a duty to civilize the inferior races" said in 1883 to justify further colonization of Algeria (hero of the left ofc).
The left and the Catholics (hoping to evangelize some more) pushed for it, along with the Jewish lobbies of the time (hoping to get more jews in France).
We didn't gain anything from it, appart from our current genocide.
In one hundred years, your people will exist, not mine.
>>
>>225573941
*social democratic
No, I will not elaborate on their differences
>>
>"french" brown nazi on a tirade about "jewish" socialism
LMAO
>>
>>225575239
your story makes for nice greek tragedy, there's something poetic about paying for your hubris, thinking you can transform others but ending up transformed yourself, get a writer on that shit
>>
File: IMG_1075.jpg (64 KB, 554x554)
64 KB JPG
>>225574642
We’re the ones replicating the US as it stands today. The socdems hasn’t had any real power since the early 00s here. We’re neolib central going back at least 20 years. A corpotarist, stock pumping shithole that beat our chest about being filled with pedophile vampire billionares and Electrolux having a good market cap while our cities get filled cheap foreign labor that squats in shoebox apartments shared by 6 people and workers bargaining power is collapsing. You can absolutely replicate the policies that actually made us a good country once upon a time because it’s the same policies that made the US a good country. They’ve been resting on their laurels from the affluence creating by the god of men and greatest president of all time that was Roosevelt and whatever of his legacy that has been kept safe from Raeganomics and elder liche liberals maintains to this day what makes the US great. National developmentalism. The US government taking a direct part in the industries and markets they want to be great, pumping them full of liquid cash and directing the affluence of them back into the system. Their universities, their healthcare research, their tech sector, their military hardware development etc etc. These were the exact same sort of policies that led to the affluence of the nordics during the cold war.
>>
>>225574928
That's basically happening to Texas and Florida. People from failing blue states are going there to leech.
>>
>>225575614
leech? my understanding is people go there because it's cheaper and has lower taxes, leeching implies you take more than you receive, which is not the case in a place like florida with few public services
>>
Thank you for telling us how to run the wealthiest nation in history, with 350 million citizens, retarded (((people's republic))) islamic thirdie
>>
>>225575516
>thinking you can transform others
No one wanted that
Most people didn't want shit to do with Algeria, most pieds-noirs were foreigners.
We really just got raped, Europe is next
>>
>>225574791
only thing you implement is infinite niggers forever
>>
>>225575491
nigger that fled niggers mad that people dont want niggers
>>
>>225575524
at the height of government interventionism in america it was still far more libertarian than scandinavia is or was, I agree with you they can implement more social policies and suck less billionaire cock, but something like 90s sweden is basically impossible there on a national level, there's extreme political and cultural aversion to that level of government and public expenditure, there's a US state that literally made it illegal to build light transit
if new england became its own country they could probably pull it off though
>>
>>225573941
There isn't, and it would never work in the US. In fact, I think that even nordicks will eventually abandon this model
>>
>>225575239
>Btw the left is the reason we went so far into Algeria, the leftists wanted to colonize Algeria to "civilize" you guys, on the expense of the French
Bullshit.
Though it may have been the "excuse" officially given to console parents seeing their sons go to a non defensive war, the entire thing was a remnant of the imperialistic momentum that led Napoleon to Russia, with the results that we all know. Competing with the British empire, who hadn't embraced muh superior democracy, was still a strong opinion at the time.
This was also the motivation for the Syrian campaign and the decision to ally with the Brits to carve out the Ottoman empire piece by piece.

>In one hundred years, your people will exist, not mine.
Sensationalist doomer fantasy.
Our greatest tragedy is unironically replacing Catholicism with Democracy as a state religion. Now it became deeply entrenched in the country's history and political tradition that the core politics are governed by selfish careerism, which explains our current political landscape and its consequences.
>>
>>225575911
They did less social program spending. That’s about it. They used to have a world leading public school system, impeccable infrastructure and more nuclear power plants than any other country in the west. They did not do less government spending per citizen. On the contrary.
They didn’t do free healthcare and college. I’m guessing mostly because of their investments in being world industry leaders in both. It was part of the national strategy for these to remain for-profit enterprise tax earners rather than just another cost.

I don’t have any opinion on the specific state level hurdles
>>
>>225574791
If some states implemented an extensive welfare system, then wouldn't all the bums and homeless people just move there, thus crashing the system?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.