[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.225636074
 No.225636074 Archived
Why don't they just join the BRICS at this point?
>>
Anonymous
No.225636269
 No.225636269
Because it would imply that the USA had equals while their whole post-war policy and indeed national image is based on the idea that they're one of a kind. They would rather be the sole rulers of a trash heap than join multilateral organizations.
>>
Anonymous
No.225636887
 No.225636887
>>225636269
Till the next presidency when the chipset for all mutt npc gets updated. They'll be the biggest pro nato supporters ever
>>
Anonymous
No.225637296
 No.225637296
>>225636269
why do you phrase it like BRICs is a relevant or serious multilateral organization the US is losing out by not being part of?
>>
Anonymous
No.225637313
 No.225637313
>>225636074
They are too brown, yellow, and black for BRICS.
>>
Anonymous ## Mod Mod Icon
 No.225638333
## Mod Mod Icon  No.225638333
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/544673997
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.