> Timmies claiming their countries didnt benefit from colonialismBro...
>>226033268some incel from Denmark gonna look at you in the face and say they didn't benefit from colonialism
Colonialism is misunderstood by browns. Europe simply got so full and developed that their ambitious got bored and looked abroad for new investment opportunities. It was a bad investment. Even Anglo colonies lost them money and ultimately bankrupted them.It wasn't theft, it was boredom. Like the wife of a rich man who loses $10k per month on her "small business." And then you faggots followed us back to white countries and now we have to pay for you here too. So yes, ultimately a mistake!
colonialism did benifit white people, but the reality is that it was the post-colonial goverment that is browns had that kept us poor.
>>226033294Denmark participated in the transatlantic slave trade.
>>226033268The non-colonial white countries have tended to fare better than the colonial ones in the long run.
>>226033294By providing services and exports to wealthier colonial empires and as such by extension sharing in the wealth? Is that the world view?
>>226033268i am a colonist, my family has lived in one of a small handful of northeastern states since the late 1700's. i don't see why i should be held responsible for the actions of Manifest Destiny fags who ran away to the desert.
>>226033396Nordics and who else? 36 slav nations making a living off manual labor in the UK?
>>226033454Germany barely had any colonial projects and became the economic engine of the whole continent. Slavs had the communism debuff so it's unfair to compare them.
>>226033492Germany built a land empire in the middle of the continent. Their subjects was the formerly mentioned slavs and desu stans like us and Finland
>>226033554If you compare them to UK and France, every other country's colony looks small, but Belgium, Germany, Netherlands were all proper colonial Empires.
>>226033492Namibia, Tanganyika, Togo, Cameroon, New Guinea
>>226033444You don't have to feel guilty at all. The Iroquois were hilariously stupid and savage and predictably lost to the first intelligent people that showed up.
>>226033268>you lost an arm and a leg but at least you managed to pick those 50 bucks out of the convoyer belt!
>>226033583Meant for >>226033492
There are countries like Iceland which are quite literally just white people showing up to a desolate barren rock and turning it into a 1st world mega developed nation and yet people still doubt that white men are the resource
>>226033594The Iroquois are among the wealthier tribes today. I have been to Akwesasne. Good facilities, like school, library, playgrounds etc.
>>226033554wronghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPUOT46ucrk
>>226033294I fucking hate that arrogance they have. This attitude that they can just go around raping and killing everyone then cry genocide when their neighbors are now a shade darker than them.
Why Ireland have a much better functionnal society than a lot of brown/african countries despite being colonized/enslaved for years and having very few resources on their soil ?
>>226033268Finland was a colonised "country" thoughever.
>>226033669Because it got built up by the American tech industry that exploits east Asian manufacturing and African mining
>>226033641These are just larping holdovers. I mean the actual nation that was here for a spell in the 18th century.
>>226033342>colonialism did benifit white people, but the reality is that it was the post-colonial goverment that is browns had that kept us poor.Indepent yes, but still subsumed to the global economic system put in place by Timmies. No ex-colonial country can abstract itself from said system.The system works by extracting surplus values from ex-colonial countries and sending them to the core capitalist financial countries.This by itself doesnt mean timmies arent exploited by their own ruling class (they are) it just means that ex-colonial countries will never develop like first world countries since:1) in order to capture capital, ex-colonial countries need something to offer, which is very cheap labour. In order for the populace to accept cheap labours, you have to give them very low-quality of life. 2) all the surplus values are sent to the main financial countries, which then lend this same money to the ex-colonial countries, keeping the cycle going on ad infinitumColonialism helped Timmies not in the sense that they extracted resources (which they did) but in the sense that it was through colonialism that they were able to spread the C-M-C'
>>226033668We obviously didn't do that. WHICH IS WHY YOUR STUPID NIGGER ASS IS STILL HERE.
>>226033740the white man isn't forcing you to strip copper wire from international welfare infrastructure
>>226033268Retarded mexispic. WE WERE COLONIZED!
>>226033740East asian model of growth proves that there is a way of a country to make it even with everything stacked agaisnt it. Vietnam is going to prove it as well.
Funniest fucking thing in American history>Americans win the war against Mexico with hardly any trouble, just total victory>End up at the peace table>"So... do you want Mexico City and the Mexican lands?">uhhh.... no, just give us the uninhabited border areas
>>226033882They're obviously going to take the land and resources instead of the people that would dillute the voter base in the country. Are you a spic?
>>226033882the uninhabited border areas are the most resourceful dumbass
>>226033740where was the surplus value in colonialism?spices/tea were cheap in their countries of production, the value in them was shipping them to europe where they couldn't be produced otherwisechina and japan partly resisted trade with europe because other than opium and silver europeans couldn't offer them much they didn't have alreadyit's the technological advantages (navigation, steam engine) that enabled colonialism that led to colonial countries being wealthier, colonialism is mostly just a symptom of europe going through the enlightenment while the rest of the world was ok with being sustenance farmers
>>226033945>>226033917IT'S LITERALLY ALL FUCKING DESERT. WE'D RATHER HAVE DESERT THAN MEXICANS.
In fact, American whites are so ungodly superpowered, that they then took that uninhabited all desert zone, somehow turned it into productive land, somehow in California turned it into a golden paradise from a brush wasteland, and THEN the spics started flooding in.You are parasites. Locusts. Like moths flying into a lamp. You create and build nothing. You chase us everywhere we go. Accept it
>>226033983Lefties especially thirdie lefties have distorted history to show how they were kangz who were impoverished by the evil White man. In reality, Drain theory is retarded and full of holes. But it provides an excuse as to why they are still shitholes.
>>226033983Why did England maintain colonies for over 2 centuries despite the political pressure, revolts and the cost of maintaining them? I think your stupid moose fucking ass will probably say it was out of the goodness of their hearts to bring civilization to the savages.
>>226034102Conquering and expanding your territory does not always need a resource reason.
Economically speaking, our colonies were a net money sink. They did help a lot during the second world war though, and also to a lesser extent during the first one
>>226034102Why did Russia invade Ukraine despite the unmitigated disaster it has cause for Russia? Because their leader staked his pride on it and refused to back down. Colonialism was just as much about status and pride as it was about geopolitics and economics.
>>226033268>My country has made no achievements in the last several hundred years>Feel guilty about this white manThis is all I'm hearing from brown men.
>>226034102what colony in particular?india was to keep the dutch/french/portuguese out, but the cost of maintaining a princely state was very little, it was rich british families like rothschilds and sassons and indians like nizam of hyderabad that profited from iteast india company had like 20k people in india
>>226033268your leading political party is in bed with the cartels. You are getting what you deserve.
>>226033996>you want the lands inhabitated by subhuman 70 IQ mestizo medjeet-injun abominations or the empty deserts that can be populated by ethnic North-Western European immigrantsthey made the best decision back in the 19th century
>>226033268till a few decades ago europeans used to move to South America looking for a better life, this disparity between firsties and thirdies is something recent.
>>226034819I wonder what changed
we were too nice during colonialism in most casesthat's why thrdies can never point to actual bad things we did, they have to cope by blaming us for crop failures and disease outbreaks etc.or they kill eachother and then absolve themselves of blame by saying we actually made them do it
>>226035103What point were you trying to make here?
>>226035196What’s the tldr behind you starving a bazillion bengalis to death?
>>226034819I don't know about few decades ago but beginning last century Argentine was wealthier than some euro countries.
>>226034240Are you implying that Ukraine is completely devoid of resources or anything of value? Kek.
>>226033268B-but you got some "universities"! (they only served as elite clubs for their own people, they never taught anything that would improve the colony and never took in anyone but their own people)
>>226035196I'm pretty sure thirdies have been naming over and over a lot of specific cases of mass murder. I don't think you ignoring it means it doesn't exist.>>226034517China has a lot a of achievements and accomplishments. Yet a lot of chinese people feel deep resentment towards japanese people. Do you think their resentment isn't justified? They're just jealous of japan?How would you feel if proportionally speaking, Japan had done the same to your country?I can understand the idea of seeing people who are perpetually upset over "sins of the past" as demanted, but honestly, it never feels like it is something the people who make this argument wouldn't feel had they been the ones dealing with the situations at play.
>>226035228tropical cyclones, japanese occupation of east asia affecting food supply and the fact that famines were endemic to india until the third agricultural revolutionit would have been cooler if churchill personally raped every bengali to death, but alas, we have to make do with reality
>>226035249They were more European back then. Now they are brown mongrel socialists.
>>226035432ah yeahslavery (we ended it)aborigial australian genocide (more abos alive today than at any point in history)bengal famine (see >>226035661)irish famine (apparently we superengineered potato blight)amritsar (gurkha chimpout in response to indians beating a woman to death, still less dead than your average islamist attack)boer war atrocities (colonialists getting colonised, why should i care)india partition (hindus and muslims murder each other, over a border the muslims wanted, and apparently that is out fault)spare me the tears
>>226035948Slavery wasn't ended because you suddenly grew a conscience after a certain point in out. It was because industrialization and machines made it redundant. So no, can't really use it as some kind of virtue signaling. Especially so when it required a lot of fighting even though the initial incentive to end it, even among those "against it", mostly steemed from a quite rational realization that it was no longer that beneficial when compared to industrialization.A lot of abos being alive today mean it was ok to abuse them? Makes no sense to me. Apply this logic to anything else and it just makes no sense.Don't know enough about this, won't pretend to.Don't care about the irish.Are you indian? Wtf is this example.This logic is very dangerous to be fair. It implies the "natives" of Europe have always been there and that historically there was no expansion.>more indian shitYou're brown aren't you?Here's a list of good examples. No one is crying btw, if anything the ones who get emotional the most by far are chuds, especially when educated opposition is presented.
>>226035306I'm implying that the costs outweighs any benefit by orders of magnitude.
Would you rather have been born in current society where you're aware of euroids being richer than you or an oogabooga primitive one where you had a 50% chance of dying before age 5 but the richest people you're aware of are tribal elders who look like you? Because that's the real choice. Europeans took all that "stolen" wealth and used it to create the industrial-scientific revolution that benefitted everyone.
I didn't do nothing, nigga.
>>226034102Unironically the only reason for that was because they were butthurt over not being recognized as an empire by Germany and forming a weird complex over it.
>>226035432weird hypothetical considering reality where nobody is begging turks for gibs despite all the atrocities they commited in their region
>>226033268YOU ARE A PSEUDO SPAINARD. Who benefited from colonialism? YOU!!! Why do Latin Americans for some reason get to dodge any sort of guilt for colonialism? Latin Americans have this strange delusion that after they broke free from the rotting Spanish and Portuguese empires that they suddenly became Native Americans again. Latin Americans look at the Brazilian Empire or the Mexican empire and go "ahh... yes!!! this is exactly what my Native American ancestors would've wanted! fuck colonialism!!"
>>226036660Why are you bringing gibs out of nowhere? All balkanoids feel resentment towards Turkey. It is justified in my opinion. Any resentment against mass massacres is justified. Pretending we should just bury the past and act like it never happened is unfair to the victims, and it's almost always the perpetuators who argue for it. And no I'm not saying what you think you're saying, no one should do anything.
>>226036948because begging for gibs is a uniquely colonial phenomenon.
>>226036372>Slavery wasn't ended because you suddenly grew a conscience blah blah blahthe classic thirdie copethere's something that really riles you guys up about britain having a conscious mass political movement to end slavery, and the fact that we enforced it militarily. so of course you have to rationalise it as a forgone conclusion (easily said in hindsight) at best and a evil scheme at worst>abosthe point is they weren't erased or genocided, outside of maybe tasmania. >Don't know enough about this, won't pretend to.>Don't care about the irish.at least you admit have no idea what you're talking about>Are you indian? Wtf is this example.>more indian shitindia was our biggest colony and those are two of the three most commonly cited crimes, work it out. but the fact that you have no idea is telling.>Here's a list of good examples. No one is crying btw, if anything the ones who get emotional the most by far are chuds, especially when educated opposition is presented.and yet here yere you are posting a weird map crying about lots of random events and figures that never happened. i mean really, 19 million "african american abortions", and the moriori genpcide (maoris killing and enslaving a population with 0 white involvement) posted as violence of the white man kek
1000 third worlders vs basic understanding of modern economy and productivity.
>>226033747I'm here because you kidnapped my ancestors and stole my other ancestors land to rape them for centuries. I'm here because whites wanted to profit from expoitation of non-europeans
>>226039699umm you can go back now thanks
>>226039749No, my family is been here much longer than most white people. If they don't like America then they can leave.
>>226033268we were exploited by the danish overlords
>>226033689>Timmies>FinlandPekka hei...
>>226033294Denmark stole our fish for centuries and yet they're still poorer than usReally makes you think
