Who in this country still supports Labour? How can Labour supporters look at all the adult porn bans, the push for digital IDs that violate online privacy, the regular protest bans enforced by the government, and continue to vote for Labour in the polls?
>>226047435Most of these policies are broadly popular among the median voter (>muh children), mostly because they are fucking stupid and can't think even one step ahead.
bump
>>226047435gooners madoonersmad
>>226047435Because the Tories ruled the UK for 14 years give or take and with disatrous consequences.Why is Labour being blamed? They have to clean the shit that David Cameron, Theresa May, Rishi Sunak, Elizabeth "i will give wealthy people a tax break, that will save the nation o algo" Truss, Boris Johnson the fat american shitcunt who liked to partyThat's the heritage Labour has to deal...it will take many decades to fix UK
based labour putting angloids in their place
Also, banning pornography is good and healthy for society.Men need to end with all the distraction, grow some balls and start curbing women and take away their rights.
>>226048989Violating people's privacy with digital IDs, banning protests around embassies, instituting the Online Safety Act that was itself drafted by the Tories, that isn't reversing Tory damage, that's Labour being the same authoritarian tyrannts as the Tories.
hot take - they ban porn to combat the hordes of horny brownoids prowling around and kidnapping young british girls to molest and sell their meat later to the kebab shops. Solution - repatriate all the browns in the uk immediately. Sorry op, i'm sure they gonna miss you
>>226049260How would banning porn accomplish that?
>>226047435>>226047435I understood that Reform was involved in several scandals including foreign donations (ruskies?) so people are madAnd on the other hand labour wants to join back EU and many people support it
>>226049282make them less horny and willing to rape. It works in their home countries
>>226049260dumb take
>>226047435I haven’t heard any good argument against the internet laws that isn’t incoherent reactionary nonsense.
>>226049384>make them less hornyComplete nonsense. Anti-porn activists have never been able to demonstrate that. Its akin to claiming banning GTA would decrease vehicle crimes
>>226049436I should be able to watch porn ot 2 consenting adults without the government throwing me in prison.
>>226049489And you can, you only need to verify your identification and age. That’s not too hard to ask.
>>226049540You haven't read the recent reports. ANYONE in the UK watching facesitting porn, regardless of their ages, could be imprisoned.
>>226047435>Labourhave they done anything that would benefit laborers at all?
>>226049895no
