What's the point of blanketing 1 square kilometer with 40+ nuclear warheads?
They can be independanty targeted and land sevral km apart.In this case they are all targeted at buildings on the one airfield but missed because 50m CEP doesn't matter for nukes.
>>65187354One of them might actually work
letting the hohols understand puccia is too pussied to do anything but threaten to nook
>>65187368>50m CEO
>>65187368Apparently one landed in the occupied parts of Donetsk
>>65187368>50m CEPmore like Minute of Oblast
>>65187749>MOO
"It's the only way to be sure."
>>65187354Do Russian warheads not use evasive manuevers during the final stage? Maybe footage is too low quality to make it out but it looks like are moving in a straight line.
>>65187749>>65189226
>>65187354Ok but unless your willing to be nuked the threat of nukes is pointless. Like what is this the hundredth nuclear threat from the kremlin?
>>65187354>40+ nuclear warheads6x6=36 for kinetic warheadonly 6 for nuclearI heard they're good at poking deep holes. Simple shelters, maybe underground tanks or factories. I doubt Kremlins claim of 300m penetration into proper, deep, hardened bunkers stands true. If they come in glowing hot, means they're shit at managing drag and actively braking limiting them to terminal velocity or molten splat.
>>65190771>I heard they're good at poking deep holes. Looking at the damage at the garages, they're not even all that good at doing that.>300mLMAO, absolutely delusional nonsense.
>>65190282>Do Russian warheads not use evasive manuevers during the final stage?notarget is nookif missile hits nook, missile is nook, also target
>>65190967Pretty much. And that 300m penetration claim is fucking hilarious. For anyone that wants to see video of said destroyed NATO base, aka garages, https://youtu.be/ijt2sGAl-aINo, I can't be bothered to mp4 it right now.
>>65187354They recovered the warheads of the submunitions by the way. The things were filled with concrete and their boards looked like something made in the 1970s
remember when they launched one oreshnik with inert warheads like it was some kind of show of force?now here's half a dozen and it's equally unthreateningI wonder if putin will ever stop bluffing and become the first man to drop the bomb in a war of aggression like he clearly wants to
>>65191627>Concrete filled MRV's (not to be confused with modern MIRV's)>Circuitry from stolen appliances made 50urs agoLiterally can't make this shit up.
>>65187354It wouldnt operate that way if it were nuclear loaded (and most would be decoys)
>>65191654Random, totally unrelated question.Does the BFA stand for Big Fuckin Asshole or am I just traumatized by Nikocado?
>>65187354Submunitions designed to damage large dispersed soft targets like tankage or electrical manufacturing pressure vessels etc. See how they are in groups? Each group of 6 is replaced by a single nuke in the nuclear version. The submunitions are likely less than 200kg, bit outsized DESU. Carrying a lot of fragmentation on them for long range kinetic effect, tungsten balls or whatever Russians use.Holy fuck these captchas
>>65190282>Do Russian warheads not use evasive manuevers during the final stage? Maybe footage is too low quality to make it out but it looks like are moving in a straight line.They're "true" hypersonics, speed is their only penetration aid, though it's a pretty good one. Manoeuvring is neither possible nor relevant.
