What would the best modern day equivalent be?
>>65198619MP5SD
Subsonic ammo along with literally any threaded bolt action or lever action of which there are countless varieties and a silencer will perform substantially better than a DeLisle. In accuracy, sound reduction, reliability, sighting. By literally every possible measure a DeLisle is a piece of shit. I don't give a fuck what noguns replies to me it doesn't change facts. And no they aren't 82 fucking decibels according to that one laughably old, unscientific and non-repeatable test in the 1940s you imbecile typing a reply.
>>65198619There isn't one answer because people realised that you really needed multiple guns to do the things a De Lisle was meant to do in all the situations a De Lisle was meant to do it. Mostly silenced pistols because killing sentries only really crops up in situations where carrying a shoulder arm is prohibitively burdensome, but things like the Honey Badger and VSS are the answer to the same question if you exclude externalities completely.
>>65198629This is an extreme retard answer because the MP5SD was never used in the same role as the De Lisle, is completely obsolete in 2026AD and isn't really even in use today as a result. It was used in the same role as silenced Stens, not De Lisles.
>>65198641>the MP5SD was never used in the same role as the De LisleIncorrect. If you think your .45 ACP bolt gun was a sniper rifle then you are delusional.>is completely obsolete in 2026ADSMGs and PCCs are obsolete, but the one I mentioned is its closest equivalent. If you really hate my answer, then the comment above yours posted not the equivalent but the major upgrade for these roles...>"things like the Honey Badger and VSS"
>>65198657the de lisle was not used in the same role as the mp5 in its soe days
>>65198619hush puppy
>>65198657>Incorrect. If you think your .45 ACP bolt gun was a sniper rifle then you are delusional.>SMGs and PCCs are obsolete, but the one I mentioned is its closest equivalent. If you really hate my answer, then the comment above yours posted not the equivalent but the major upgrade for these roles...You are utterly fucking stupid and the mere act of reading the idiocy your brain produced has already made be dumber as well. Good riddance.
>>65198661Dude, the carbine's primary function was the precise, single-shot elimination of isolated targets, such as guards or sentries, without alerting nearby enemy forces. Used primarily during raids and assassinations. You are deluding yourself if you think the integrally suppressed MP5 wasn't being used for the same purposes.>>65198692>Good riddance.Goodbye, pseudointellectual.
>>65198619Suppressed Turkshit loaded with slugs.
>>65198694The best evidence that your imagined version of reality is completely fictitious is that the De Lisle carbine stayed in service and in use well after the MP5SD was adopted. It was used right through the Vietnam War alongside Rugers by the Americans, and even in Northern Ireland by the British into the 90s. Subsonic 9x19mm sucks in every way a round can suck. There is a reason OHWS replaced De Lisle and Rugers with a .45 but didn't replace any MP5s at all.
>>65198714>There is a reason OHWS replaced De Lisle and Rugers with a .45 but didn't replace any MP5s at all.Yeah, because the MP5s didn't need replacing. Lots of units that used them still do. On the other hand a ton of suppressed .45 guns got replaced with suppressed .300 BLK guns.
Q's new 8.6 BLK rifle.
>>65198722>because the MP5s didn't need replacingAlmost like MP5SDs didn't have the same role or function as the De Lisle and pistols that were being replaced.>On the other hand a ton of suppressed .45 guns got replaced with suppressed .300 BLK guns.I'm glad that after a half a dozen posts you are finally willing to concese that I was completely right in my original post on point that you originally mocked:>"things like the Honey Badger and VSS"
>>65198694the mp5sd >could beused for that, but its primary purpose was not specifically that the de lisle is hyper-specialized for that specific role and nothing else
>>65198733>I'm glad that after a half a dozen posts you are finally willing to concese that I was completely right in my original post on point that you originally mocked:I wasn't mocking the honey badger answer at all, you pseudointellectual. The other guy (unless, of course, you are the same guy and were just samefagging; how pathetic) was whining about my answer, so I pointed out the other answer.
>>65198741>used for that, but its primary purpose was not specifically that >the de lisle is hyper-specialized for that specific role and nothing elseFair enough, but sentry removal is such a niche role that literally any suppressed gun could do it. In the Cold War some special units would do it with a .22 LR gun, remember the High Standard (basically an integrally suppressed Colt Woodsman).
>>65198641Literally the reason it was kept around into the late 2000s. You see an SD strapped to the backpack of some CIF guy in Iraq in 2008, he wasn't carrying that as some sort of retro flex, it was to kill dogs and sentries.
>>65198619Any suppressed lever gun.
>>65198641>It was used in the same role as silenced StensWhich were mostly also used as single shot sentry elimination weapons? What's your point?
Some bolt action integrally suppressed 300 BLK, there's a lot of these now
>>65198619Suppressed Ruger M77 in .357 Mag shooting .38 Special LRNs in 158gr.
>>651986198.6 blackout.
>>65199568Why would you want that rail going the full length of the suppressor? Seems like a bunch of unneeded extra weight on an already front-heavy rifle
>>65199571No, I agree. This should have a small pic rail for a LPVO or just irons.
>>65198619Side charger SBR AR in .300blk with suppressor and fully adj/cut off gas port.
