https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6xFW_7kPu4
>>65211557>thing is patented>invetors forced to innovate >consumers get more choices Wow the system works.
>>65211563the supersaftey isn't under the patent, so no, the system isn't "working"
>>65211563>thing is open source>niggerman makes a bogus patent stealing the open source invention>niggerman sells patent to Rage Greed Niggers>Rage Greed Niggers sue the actual inventor who made it open source>Tim Hoffman goes on to make another open source (and even simpler) forced reset deviceLet me guess how Rage Greed Niggers are going to react? They'll sue Tim again and get another patent troll to file another fraudulent patent they can buy.
>>65211568>>65211576I know you guys are 18 year old libertarians that don't believe IP law should exist. I get it. I've been there too and I still pirate plenty of stuff. But ignoring patents just because they make you upset is silly and frankly counterproductive.
>>65211557Holy shit. That is both genius and simple.You could make that with plate steel, a hacksaw, a drill and some files.
>>65211568What the fuck does that have to do with this guy BTFO Rarebreed?
>>65211599You really don't understand patents do you? Do you know why Amazon is the only major retailer with a single click to buy button? It's not because other people can't do it. Patents will always have their place and are useful, but you're kidding yourself believing it's a functional system. About the only people that are using it properly are medicine makers and they effectively troll sick people by modifying formulas of functional meds so they can renew patents.
>>65211599
>>65211612>but you're kidding yourself believing it's a functional system.But it is a functional system. An inventor was forced to innovate around a patent and now we have another FRT on the market. More consumer choice!>>65211638This is true. I hate arguing with leftists exactly because of this.
>>65211557WHORE!
>>65211656>watch on youtube button literally RIGHT THEREPlease learn to read.
>>65211644you're not using those terms correctlyhes not innovating "around" a patent, hes innovating around a company that is attacking him for creating a better product under false pretensessaying "innovating around" implies that rarebreed is in the rightthey aren't
>>65211656whoops, sorry anon, here you gohttps://files.catbox.moe/es1p3r.mp4
>>65211667They own the patent on the reset mechanism, anon. We can have an argument about the value and efficacy of IP law and patents but legally they ARE in the right.
>>65211678they own the patent for the specific mechanism that is on the patentthey don't own the forced reset trigger concept, those were already extant before they filed the patent, and you can't own something you literally do not owni have no idea why you can't understand this, seek a medical professional
>>65211678The patent IS invalid, that's the argument. It's a patent based on Hoffman's work, 2 out of three of raregreeds patents are already bunk. Now he's being sued for his own invention because he open sourced it vs patenting it. I'm going to patent 4 wheeled vehicles because no one has the patent on that right now I'm going to get it and sue Ford... see how fucking retarded that is?
>>65211670>>65211698bot
>>65211687Yes they own the patent for the reset mechanism that is the subject of the patent suit which Rarebreed will almost certainly win. Luckily for Hoffman he just developed a new FRT that doesn't use that mechanism so when the court tells him to stop distributing the original design he can still distribute/sell stuff! Innovation! More consumer choice!>>65211691He "open sourced it", whatever that means, after Rarebreed filed their patent. That's the only reason this suit wasn't directed out at pleadings. Because, despite what libertarians might want, you actuallly DO get special rights if you're first to invent something. Hoffman has the rights to this NEW FRT design, and he can do whatever he likes with it because it's new and his and he was first! No one can patent it and if he wants to give it away for free he can! Ingenuity! Market forces!
>>65211557I'm assuming with standard trigger this kicker just does safe and super kick right?
>>65211705Telling you the truth faggot. Jerking off to gun porn she wont fuck any of you white knights dont chimp out.
>>65211706why do you keep bitching about libertarians? they have nothing to do with thisdid you fall out of a portal straight from 2013? (if so, tell me where it is, i want to go back)
>>65211672OP delivers!
>>65211706>He "open sourced it", whatever that means.He published information about it publicly prior to any patent covering a safe reset action being requested making the information and design public domain. Party A (Hoffman) designed it and released it, Party B patented it after that to "protect it", then Party C (Raregreed) bought the patent from Party B and is using it to sue Party A. Patent laws apparently don't care if you made it first and advertised it if someone else swoops in and patents you invention before you even if it's released under public domain as long as the patent was granted by a patent officer not doing their fucking job. You're misunderstanding how many patents raregreed thinks they have and what they cover. You're getting wires crossed because you don't care enough to actually know the situation. You're assuming their suing for #1 or #2 they had before Hoffman, but they're suing for #3 which they had after the info was public domain.
>>65211743Nice argument, but you are a le cringe lolberg if you don't suck Raregreed's dick, them's the rules. Don't blame me, I didn't make the rules, I just patented 'em.Sent from my iPhone via Tapatalk.
>>65211557The previous design had 3 modes (safe, semi, and full); this new product only has 2 modes (safe and full). Giving up semi-auto functionality makes this an inferior product, unfortunately. We just have to wait for RareGreed to lose the lawsuit so we can get more options in the market.
>>65211774How are you so bad at this? Like just let go of the trigga, nigga. Lol. Seriously, fuck is wrong with yall? Smh
>>65211784She wont fuck you either white knight simp she likes guys who touch her breast fucking boy. She is telling you what real men do to her moron
>>65211787>sheyup, its a bot
>>65211798I've seen it a couple times now. Weird topic to set up a bot to spam.
>>65211784That was my first message in this thread, whatever has your panties in a bunch has nothing to do with me.
>>65211557So I need to buy more super safeties now, right?
>>65211743They have 3. 2 of them have prior art and they're going to lose on them. 1 of them (the reset mechanism) is good and they will win on it. Screencap this. Hoffman seems like a cool dude with some great ideas but he did infringe on the reset mechanism patent. Thankfully he invented his way out of the situation and developed the new FRT in the OP.
>>65211599Anything that has been publicly demonstrated is not supposed to be patentable. But when the patent office screws up and issues a bogus patent, it's still really hard to get it revoked.
Will this work on a Mac N Cheese with a trip bar?
>>65212231That would be very true if Hoffman didn't admit on twitter that he infringed on the patent. There are literally screenshots in the lawsuit btw.
