Will the M249s finally be viable once an FRT becomes available for it?
viable?
>>65211803no, still costs way too muchyou also need to lock the bolt carrier back with a block to change the barrel, which is really gay
>>65211803No since your ammo isn't taxpayer funded. Which begs the question why nobody is trying to make a belt fed 22 upper for the AR or just a clean sheet design with an FRT built in
>>65211828>Lakeside Machine Razorback
>>65211828>ammo costIf you can afford to drop 15k on a semi auto version of a belt fed that was only transferrable for two years you can afford to feed it.
>>65211803You could buy 3 Lima Six belt-fed uppers for the price of one civilian legal M249. Don't fall for the FN meme.
Why is there no repro of it?
>>65211955
>>65211803obsolete since the gods new rifle the m27 was invented
>>65211803you've made this thread before
>>65211828I know you're poor but a few thousand rounds of 5.56 really isn't that expensive if you have a full time job.
>>65212021a few thousand rounds goes away quick in full auto belt feds
>>65212042Okay? And then you buy more with your salary. When you have a full time job money is just a thing you can get more of if you wait a little bit.
>>65211803>closed bolt bet fedcringe
This isn't an engineering-manufacture obstacle.Why not just solve the actual problem with NFA repeal?
