They already had gas turbine driven jadgpanther models OTL, assuming no lend lease and the subsequent stalling and giga rape of any offensives both sides conduct post 1943. A Cold War between sovgol union and krautmenistan would be likely. With a stagnant eastern front, the krauts would have an actual chance at keeping the allies out of continental europe or pushing them back to the sea would the nazis design what is essentially an abrams tank with composite armour,gas turbines and 105mm in the early 60s against the t 64? They would probably forget what boats are given the blockades so i would guess they would invest in these sorts of things.
Shut the fuck up. Stop posting, turn off your computer, and walk away. Do not come back here.
>>65224384>he fears wonderwaffle autismthe concepts and their implications are fun. remember that the F-86 was quite very much improved by said kraut tech with miggers benefitting similarly.This is despite the projects being simultenious or even being started after the krauts were at it during the war. Admit it like a good slut, the nazis were good at designing weapons
>>65224412german engineering is garbage, and ww2 is no exceptionliterally if they werent so retarded and wasteful with their resources they could have actually won the wartake the v1 for example, an elegant cruise missile for time, but completely ineffective and they built like ten thousand of them. literally so much effort and materials wasted on being a minor inconvenience to the british is just so hilariously stupid
>>65224412>the F-86 was quite very much improved by said kraut techFirstly, holy ESL Batman. Secondly, which parts, what improvements? Be specific.
>>65224412I always hated the E-100 because while the rest share parts and have similarities, the E-100 has no shared parts at all. In fact the fucking tank isn't even designed to be part of the E-Series.It's a rebranding of an existing superheavy tank project.
>>65224441Their engineering was average with some good and interesting stuff, what's particularly good about the krauts was that they were autistic and desperate enough to latch on to basically anything, if the krauts were in the allied position but with the same mindset they would have probably unironically had an iceberg carrier either in active service or built just sitting there the whole time for example. V1's problem was that it was inaccurate, if the krauts had wasserfall missiles as they wanted, they would have had production capabilities for an accurate joystick driven version of the V2 which would be pretty good if you're considering this would likely be before 1950 in a country under siege on all sides, regardless if the enemy is actively winning at the time or not. Maybe the krauts could even retroactively add controller support for the V1s and use the already existing v1 facilities as WW2 tomahawk launchers>Imagine Rommel going around on a armoured car with binoculars behind enemy lines, personally bombing allied HQs with what is essentially an atari joystick and a radio set>>65224468You can elaborate by doubling down like >quite very muchThis means krauts not just quite a bit improved the plane but actually definitively impacted the development of the plane mr. grammar hitler, do you also shoot kittens for fun? just like take out a .22lr pistol and dome a kitten or two while on a walk because they meowed wrong. You monster.>which partMostly wings, as the project was in the works beforehand but what made the f-86 the f-86 was its wings>>65224615Well they did stop superheavy development in 1943, the bureaucratic spirit of the designers latch on to anything they can. It still works like this in most military industrial complexes to my knowledge
>>65224441The V1 was actually combat and economically effective; surely you're thinking of the V2?
>>65224344Gas turbine super heavy with a 40s glass transmission seems exactly like what Germans would build. Bet there were drawings somewhere.
>>65224683hahaha yeah dude so effective that when a buzz bomb flew overhead it was a spectacle to the britishit could not effectively hit anything, warhead was pissant sized, and the cost to build a valved pulsejet made it stupid as something meant to explodeliterally if they would have not done v1 at all but entirely funded v2 and v3 it would have been betterthe v2 was literally more effective than v1 thanks to having a greater payload and not making any noise, but really its fault was it still being used to target england and as far as we know they never actually tried to strike something at great range with one. maybe if they would have let it cook maybe vb woulda made the first ICBM. v3 on the other hand could woulda been perfect against london, much cheaper to operate, but ofc the germans were retarded and never used it in the one campaign where shock was the only expected result
>>65224344The Maus was their literal attempt at making something that could withstand HEAT using 40s technology. It did so by being so fat and thick that the jet would pool in the hole it made in the armor before penetrating all the way. It did this at the cost of being an unmanuverable barnyard that could be hit by artillery with minimal protection over any other tank of the time, with much greater likelihood.
>>65224954Read the AAF general Hap Arnold's statistical breakdown of V1, V2, and B17 costs from 1946.The practicality ratings were: buzz bombs are best by a large margin, manned bombers are second, liquid fueled rockets were a negative value.The only reason anyone cared about ballistic liquid fuel rockets was the atomic bomb.
>>65224468swept wings
>>65224971literally 1/10th of the v1s germany launched made it to the UK, every single v2 made it, and had a 2x higher casualty count even if you only consider the v1s that actually made it and blew up. it would make sense that a neo-nazi doesn't understand basic maths behind logisitics and military strategy, just like the germans.
>>65224961>The Maus was their literal attempt at making something that could withstand HEAT using 40s technologyNo it wasn't, it was meant to be a mobile pillbox and while resistance to HEAT may have been a consideration, the armor was thick so it could tank shots even better than the Tiger, with proper infantry support and air cover, the Maus would be an extremely potent obstacle which would require much more effort to destroy than essentially every armored vehicle made before it.The only issue, as usual for German vehicles, was mobility and the (probable) lack of reliability. I also think it would be a waste anyways, because it is reasonable to assume for the price and resources of one Maus, multiple smaller vehicles could be made and could arguably be much more useful, even on the defensive.
why didn't they just put a v2 on a submarine?
>>65227062If they weren't being raped so bad they probably would've. The ocean turned into no-mans-land for U-Boats by 43.
>>65226564Except the V1 was so much fucking cheaper than the V2 (and more accurate) that it was more effective despite a bunch getting shot down.And for every V1 getting shot down, that's a flak gun battery, fighter patrol, etc which isn't being sent into Germany.
